Dear Sir
There are 2 particular photos in the database relating to a Fokker 100 aircraft VH-NHJ - 8342854 (yes, taken by myself) & 8436001 taken by another enthusiast.
Whilst I acknowledge that with respect to exposure, sharpening and composition etc, 8436001 is technically a good photograph. However, I am curious to know by what standard it represents an acceptable photograph of a Fokker 100 aircraft VH-NHJ for the purposes of jetphotos or FlightRadar24 when a portion of the port side wing is the only part of the aircraft visible. Unless the viewer can identify the wing surface components, I am not sure how anyone could link that view directly to a Fokker 100 let alone the particular aircraft VH-NHJ.
I would be grateful if you could advise how this photograph was accepted?
There are 2 particular photos in the database relating to a Fokker 100 aircraft VH-NHJ - 8342854 (yes, taken by myself) & 8436001 taken by another enthusiast.
Whilst I acknowledge that with respect to exposure, sharpening and composition etc, 8436001 is technically a good photograph. However, I am curious to know by what standard it represents an acceptable photograph of a Fokker 100 aircraft VH-NHJ for the purposes of jetphotos or FlightRadar24 when a portion of the port side wing is the only part of the aircraft visible. Unless the viewer can identify the wing surface components, I am not sure how anyone could link that view directly to a Fokker 100 let alone the particular aircraft VH-NHJ.
I would be grateful if you could advise how this photograph was accepted?
Comment