Real and replica aircraft

[Alex - Spot-This !]

They both look acceptable to me.

Regards

Alex

[rui cardoso]

If it's a new frame, the real one, then it's valid yes, no problem.

Regards
Alex

Hi Alex

Can you answer my new question in this publication, thank you

[rui cardoso]

Can these photos be accepted with the vegetation in front? I know it is a reason for rejection, however these photos are not of aircraft that are in active service. I have seen photos (scanned from a negative) accepted, and have had one accepted myself, of one that no longer flies, but these photos have more vegetation, so I am asking if they can be accepted for the "life story".

[rui cardoso]

If it's a new frame, the real one, then it's valid yes, no problem.

Regards
Alex

Thanks Alex.

[Alex - Spot-This !]

If it's a new frame, the real one, then it's valid yes, no problem.

Regards
Alex

[rui cardoso]

Hi crew

In the JP base there is the registration 17 referring to a Fairey IIID Mk.2, displayed in the air museum, however these photo correspond to a replica, the real plane is displayed in another museum. I have photo of the replica and the original, but I want to submit the photo of the original. My question is if this photo is submitted following what already exists or if I can classify as new record or hot photo.
The real plane has history, as 100 years ago it completed the first crossing of the South Atlantic between Portugal and Brazil.
The replica https://www.jetphotos.com/photo/9916269
Attached the real aircraft