Announcement

Collapse
No announcement yet.

About rejection (twice) of hot photo

Collapse
This topic is closed.
X
X
 
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts

  • About rejection (twice) of hot photo

    Hello,
    Unfortunately this hot photo was rejected twice.
    JetPhotos.com is the biggest database of aviation photographs with over 5 million screened photos online!

    JetPhotos.com is the biggest database of aviation photographs with over 5 million screened photos online!

    I do not understand the reason for the rejections.
    I have not been receiving lately the emails with the results of the screening process.
    Also the reason does not seen in the comments.
    Please explain to me what the problem is.
    Best regards,
    Michael.
    Click image for larger version

Name:	Clipboard02-MIHA.jpg
Views:	477
Size:	57.1 KB
ID:	1140009
    Attached Files

  • #2
    Hello,
    The shot appears to be missing c/n, which potentially might be a rejection reason as the other shots do have the c/n specified, or at least I don't see it on the rejection page.
    However, the shot is not hot anymore as it is already present: https://www.jetphotos.com/photo/10625989.
    I have some time ago had an issue with bad info reasoning either and then I found out, that the reason may be specified in the appeal form.
    Can you please open the appeal form and check, if the reason is present?

    Comment


    • #3
      Originally posted by JuklicekCZ View Post
      Hello,
      The shot appears to be missing c/n, which potentially might be a rejection reason as the other shots do have the c/n specified, or at least I don't see it on the rejection page.
      However, the shot is not hot anymore as it is already present: https://www.jetphotos.com/photo/10625989.
      I have some time ago had an issue with bad info reasoning either and then I found out, that the reason may be specified in the appeal form.
      Can you please open the appeal form and check, if the reason is present?
      Hello, sorry, wrong answer. In links of this kind the c/n it always does not appear.

      Comment


      • #4
        Hi Michael,
        Looks like a mistake from our side. As it's unfair to you I'll add the photo

        With kind Regards
        Alex

        Comment

        Working...
        X