Hello,
I have now received this rejection:
My comment was regarding a different horizontal stablilizer and a reply was that it is a spare part, thus not hot.
It indeed may be a spare part, or just the livery sticker pealed off.
However, from my point of view, regardless of whether it is a spare part or not, the result is, that there is an aircraft, that has a different appearance from what is currently published.
And I also think, that the following point from the Guidelines does apply to this.
The line explicitly states any change for an active aircraft and there are even shots of an aircraft in paintshop which were processed as hot after a removal of the original livery and then again after the application of the new one, which is something, that kind of confuses me then.
With respect above, could any screenerer/admin please comment on, whether this can be considered hot, or nor?
Thanks.
I have now received this rejection:
My comment was regarding a different horizontal stablilizer and a reply was that it is a spare part, thus not hot.
It indeed may be a spare part, or just the livery sticker pealed off.
However, from my point of view, regardless of whether it is a spare part or not, the result is, that there is an aircraft, that has a different appearance from what is currently published.
And I also think, that the following point from the Guidelines does apply to this.
The line explicitly states any change for an active aircraft and there are even shots of an aircraft in paintshop which were processed as hot after a removal of the original livery and then again after the application of the new one, which is something, that kind of confuses me then.
With respect above, could any screenerer/admin please comment on, whether this can be considered hot, or nor?
Thanks.
Comment