Bad Info - Aircraft / Registration / Serial Number

[JuklicekCZ]

Hello,
Recently I have met this aircraft at a flying competition.
I have already searched through everywhere, but I did not manage to find any information about the model.
Everywhere included the competitions web site where I found the aircraft the model was just titled as "Pája" wich supposedly is the machines nickname.
I really have no clue about the maker, whether it is some kit or whether it is some kind of a home build from scratch.
Does anyone have an idea how to fill the form for this photo?
Thanks.

[ErwinS]

Aircraft is available under Homebuilt Aircraft as Paja

[JuklicekCZ]

Aircraft is available under Homebuilt Aircraft as Paja

Thanks, she is accepted.

[santiblanquez]

Hello,

This post focuses on two of my particular images, one being the following:

CN-ATQ | Canadair CL-415 | Morocco - Air Force | Santiago Blnquez | JetPhotos

Where I uploaded a registration and MSN correction more than 4 times for a period well over a year (The serial is clearly CN-ATO, not ATQ). Never been corrected.

Today I realized that my latest picture accepted (193 | Airbus C295W | Instituto Nacional de Tcnica Aeroespacial | Santiago Blnquez | JetPhotos) Although accepted with the valid registration (TX.21-14) has been changed to 193. While when the final customer registration is hidden that has some sense, I don't see the point at changing the registration to the serial number when the final registration is clearly readable in the tail.

regards,

Santiago.

[ErwinS]

Thanks for the correction on that CL-415 shot. That you can not correct your own shots is because of data cheaters.

Anyway, that C295 still has the test reg applied, as courtesy I corrected that.

[OCFLT_OMGcat]

Hi here,

Apology in advance for my dumb mistake. I just realized that I incorrectly entered A7-BES as the reg number for this one while obviously it should be A7-BET. Would appreciate anyone who could make this correction.

https://www.jetphotos.com/photo/10725970

Thank you and have good rest of the week.

Kind regard

[bleuair]

OMG she is corrected!

[Eduardo Paixăo Silva]

Hello

About registration G-XATW, an A321NX from Titan Airways. Is it considered special scheme? Thanks

[D3cuuu]

Hi

Accidentally I typed A6 instead of A7, and we got Etihad instead of Qatar

Can you correct it? Thanks

https://www.jetphotos.com/photo/10753395

Antek

[Cameron Walz]

You can correct it yourself by clicking "correct Info".

[bgkicks49]

Hi

Accidentally I typed A6 instead of A7, and we got Etihad instead of Qatar

Can you correct it? Thanks

https://www.jetphotos.com/photo/10753395

Antek

Looks to be fixed in the database now

[[email protected]]

I made a submission that is in the queue for a p-51 Mustang using the registration number from the FAA web site. There is one other photo in the JP database of the plane with that registration from prior to a restoration, so it looks different. Since uploading I’ve noticed that the same plane is also in the JP database with an alternate registration, looking the same as my submission. I’m wondering if I should cancel the submission and use the alternate reg so it matches the others, or add a note, or what. Here’s a link mentioning both registration numbers, but the one I used is the one in the FAA record (N151JT):

https://www.airhistory.net/photo/146082/N151JT/NL151JT/412943

Thanks.

[ErwinS]

Pls use the registration as displayed on the aircraft.

Brgds

[JoseJorge]

Hello!
The plane with the german registration D-EIDT in all the photos at JP is designated as a Cessna 400, but in the fuselage is visible Columbia 400. Also at Flightradar is designated as Columbia. In my opinion Columbia should be the right designation.

[ErwinS]

You can use Colombia