The Pics in db have been changed. Thanks for pointing it out!
Announcement
Collapse
No announcement yet.
Bad Info - Aircraft / Registration / Serial Number
Collapse
This is a sticky topic.
X
X
-
Hello,
In these two pictures of mine, I entered wrong data inadvertently
TF-ISN | Boeing 767-319(ER) | Icelandair | Santiago Blánquez | JetPhotos This one is TF-ISP, as shown on the gear door.
168257 | Boeing EA-18G Growler | United States - US Navy (USN) | Santiago Blánquez | JetPhotos This one's correct CN is G-39 instead of G-42.
regards.
Comment
-
Hi, got two Robinson R44, I found the MSN, but I cannot find the exact Subtype of these two helicopters.
C-GNMX and C-GBLF
GNMX got rejected as bad info - Aircraft, I put in Robinson R44 Raven.
Thanks in advance
Comment
-
I got this photo rejected for "Bad info": https://www.jetphotos.com/viewqueued_b.php?id=11071247
Probably you wrote me in the rejection e-mail what I did wrong, unfortunately my mail provider is down and I haven't received it...
Anyway, as I wrote in the comments for the screeners, the auto-fill lists it as a Cessna 172G, however I uploaded it as a Cessna 172SP, because it is listed as such on the owner website: https://www.skyservices-flightacadem...a-c172-i-skyr/
How should I re-upload it?
Thanks in advance!
Comment
-
Hello,
I was wondering whether you would be able to add missing data to following pic:
Fligh NMA1002 LEMD-HELX. SU-NMG. Airbus A320-214. JetPhotos.com is the biggest database of aviation photographs with over 5 million screened photos online!
Aircraft type: Airbus A320-214
Photo location: Madrid Barajas - LEMD, Spain
I'm pretty sure that I have provided these data while uploading (otherwise it would be rejected for bad info), but cannot see it today.
Cheers
Tomasz
Comment
-
Hi there,
last Registration of this nice Gina https://www.jetphotos.com/photo/10664434 was 99-43. Why was it changed by the photo screener to the previous reg 31-85?
I got a rejection for the same bird due to bad info, I guess because I stated the last active registration 99-43. As far as I remember I explained why the 99-43 schould be stated for this one in the "Comments to screeners" box. A short explanation why the jp crew wants the older registration would be nice.
Greetings Felix
Comment
Comment