Bad Info - Aircraft / Registration / Serial Number

[andriyy]

Hi, I accidentally wrote the wrong registration for the aircraft below, it’s supposed to be HP-1823CMP, not HP-1832CMP, can this please be fixed? Thanks so much!
The link to the photo is:
https://www.jetphotos.com/photo/9998633

[Quebec Golf]

Hi team,

I had a photo of the USAF Thunderbirds rejected a month or two ago for Bad Info. Given that the USAF tail numbers of the individual aircraft in the photo are not known (not painted on the aircraft), what is the Jetphotos way of filling out the photo info?

The model is not an issue (F-16CM/DM).

Thanks,

Alex

[Ozymandias]

Looking for the CN/Serial number for these but can’t find it anywhere. It’s I believe one is an AW139 of the Egyptian Airforce and one AW109 of the EAF operated as an air ambulance by the Egyptian Ambulance Organisation (in this scenario it would still be uploaded as a military aircraft right?)


I am also looking for the registration of flight MS887 on 9 October if someone with a subscription to flightaware or similar service can help.

[Ozymandias]

I have some shots of this Westland Commando MK.2 of the Egyptian Airforce, but that variant isn’t available on JP. I’ve tried adding it as a new model of the Westland Seaking of which it is a variant, but I’m a bit confused whether this is correct or if it should be included as its own type (Westland Commando) with the model being MK.2. Egypt is the only operator of the MK.2 so I’m sure there are no others in the database listed under a different name.

[pawelm]

At least there's a trace of D-HMUP reg that actually was used for a same type heli http://www.helionline.net/photogalle...//D-HMUP+S-101 .

[LX-A343]

I wonder how someone can get a hot photo when the plane is already in database and its a static one so it can't change it's reg

https://www.jetphotos.com/photo/9940132 - "hot"

https://www.jetphotos.com/photo/9886552 - existing one

Its the static helicopter in the roundabout near airbus helicopter.

Different reg, with no other photos in the db. The reg isn't visible on the helo. So either we got screwed, or ....

[StefBrat]

I wonder how someone can get a hot photo when the plane is already in database and its a static one so it can't change it's reg

https://www.jetphotos.com/photo/9940132 - "hot"

https://www.jetphotos.com/photo/9886552 - existing one

Its the static helicopter in the roundabout near airbus helicopter.

[EDDFspotter]

I received a Bad Info - Aircraft rejection for this submission:
https://www.jetphotos.com/viewqueued_b.php?id=8457724

The FAA registration info says N1960H s/n 298 is a Falcon 900EX. It does have winglets, so it's either a Falcon 900EX with winglets retrofitted, or a 900LX. This particular aircraft was built in 2016, which is after the 900LX was introduced. I couldn't find any info about when Falcon 900EX production ended. Does anyone know the actual type of Falcon 900 for this airframe? Thanks for your help.

I posted this question in the Digital Photo Processing forum a few days ago to get an answer from a reviewer, but I see this is probably the more appropriate forum. A user (not a reviewer) said they think this is a 900LX.

The FAA database often doesn't list subtypes as they all fall under the FAA certified type (for example SR22 instead of SR22T-GTS), that may be also the case here. All other online sources say it is a 900LX, reliable sources for business jets are for example LAASdata or RzJets.

Regards,
Sebastian

[mpinnau]

I received a Bad Info - Aircraft rejection for this submission:
https://www.jetphotos.com/viewqueued_b.php?id=8457724

The FAA registration info says N1960H s/n 298 is a Falcon 900EX. It does have winglets, so it's either a Falcon 900EX with winglets retrofitted, or a 900LX. This particular aircraft was built in 2016, which is after the 900LX was introduced. I couldn't find any info about when Falcon 900EX production ended. Does anyone know the actual type of Falcon 900 for this airframe? Thanks for your help.

I posted this question in the Digital Photo Processing forum a few days ago to get an answer from a reviewer, but I see this is probably the more appropriate forum. A user (not a reviewer) said they think this is a 900LX.

[ganevo]

Hello everyone,

please help me to find the serial Number of PK-LDH

many thank you.
#staysafe

[EDDFspotter]

Hello,
The aircraft on this picture https://www.jetphotos.com/photo/9793371 is not an AT-802A. As it is th two-seater version, it is AT-802. Then the s/n comes as 802-0841.
Many thanks for fixing this error.

Fixed!

Regards,
Sebastian

[verplanken]

Hello,
The aircraft on this picture https://www.jetphotos.com/photo/9793371 is not an AT-802A. As it is th two-seater version, it is AT-802. Then the s/n comes as 802-0841.
Many thanks for fixing this error.

[marfi80]

Oh wow, thanks. I wasn't aware that this is just a fake registration.

Best,
marfi80

[ErwinS]

Hello everyone,

I took a shot of a F104 Starfighter on display (see below). Reg is 23-34 from German Air Force. Does anybody have an idea where to get a serial number for this one? I didn't find a reliable source.

Thanks and best,
marfi80

https://www.jetphotos.com/registration/24-17?term=24-17

This one

[marfi80]

Hello everyone,

I took a shot of a F104 Starfighter on display (see below). Reg is 23-34 from German Air Force. Does anybody have an idea where to get a serial number for this one? I didn't find a reliable source.

Thanks and best,
marfi80