Announcement

Collapse
No announcement yet.

Bad Info - Aircraft / Registration / Serial Number

Collapse
This is a sticky topic.
X
X
 
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts

  • john1024
    replied
    Does anyone can help me, I have no idea why following was rejected. Also got no screener comment. Would be helpful to get any hint from the screeners.

    https://www.jetphotos.com/viewqueued_b.php?id=10859144

    Thanks in advance

    Leave a comment:


  • bleuair
    replied
    The Pics in db have been changed. Thanks for pointing it out!

    Leave a comment:


  • ErwinS
    replied
    You can use Colombia

    Leave a comment:


  • JoseJorge
    replied
    Hello!
    The plane with the german registration D-EIDT in all the photos at JP is designated as a Cessna 400, but in the fuselage is visible Columbia 400. Also at Flightradar is designated as Columbia. In my opinion Columbia should be the right designation.

    Click image for larger version

Name:	forumJP_D-EIDT01.jpg
Views:	227
Size:	188.8 KB
ID:	1151869

    Click image for larger version

Name:	forumJP_D-EIDT02.jpg
Views:	220
Size:	101.7 KB
ID:	1151870



    Leave a comment:


  • ErwinS
    replied
    Pls use the registration as displayed on the aircraft.

    Brgds

    Leave a comment:


  • tlsmart1@gmail.com
    replied
    I made a submission that is in the queue for a p-51 Mustang using the registration number from the FAA web site. There is one other photo in the JP database of the plane with that registration from prior to a restoration, so it looks different. Since uploading I’ve noticed that the same plane is also in the JP database with an alternate registration, looking the same as my submission. I’m wondering if I should cancel the submission and use the alternate reg so it matches the others, or add a note, or what. Here’s a link mentioning both registration numbers, but the one I used is the one in the FAA record (N151JT):

    https://www.airhistory.net/photo/146...NL151JT/412943

    Thanks.

    Leave a comment:


  • bgkicks49
    replied
    Originally posted by D3cuuu View Post
    Hi

    Accidentally I typed A6 instead of A7, and we got Etihad instead of Qatar

    Can you correct it? Thanks

    https://www.jetphotos.com/photo/10753395

    Antek
    Looks to be fixed in the database now

    Leave a comment:


  • Cameron Walz
    replied
    You can correct it yourself by clicking "correct Info".

    Leave a comment:


  • D3cuuu
    replied
    Hi

    Accidentally I typed A6 instead of A7, and we got Etihad instead of Qatar

    Can you correct it? Thanks

    https://www.jetphotos.com/photo/10753395

    Antek

    Leave a comment:


  • Eduardo Paix„o Silva
    replied
    Hello

    About registration G-XATW, an A321NX from Titan Airways. Is it considered special scheme? Thanks

    Leave a comment:


  • bleuair
    replied
    OMG she is corrected!

    Leave a comment:


  • OCFLT_OMGcat
    replied
    Hi here,

    Apology in advance for my dumb mistake. I just realized that I incorrectly entered A7-BES as the reg number for this one while obviously it should be A7-BET. Would appreciate anyone who could make this correction.

    https://www.jetphotos.com/photo/10725970

    Thank you and have good rest of the week.

    Kind regard

    Leave a comment:


  • ErwinS
    replied
    Thanks for the correction on that CL-415 shot. That you can not correct your own shots is because of data cheaters.

    Anyway, that C295 still has the test reg applied, as courtesy I corrected that.

    Leave a comment:


  • santiblanquez
    replied
    Hello,

    This post focuses on two of my particular images, one being the following:

    CN-ATQ | Canadair CL-415 | Morocco - Air Force | Santiago Blnquez | JetPhotos

    Where I uploaded a registration and MSN correction more than 4 times for a period well over a year (The serial is clearly CN-ATO, not ATQ). Never been corrected.

    Today I realized that my latest picture accepted (193 | Airbus C295W | Instituto Nacional de Tcnica Aeroespacial | Santiago Blnquez | JetPhotos) Although accepted with the valid registration (TX.21-14) has been changed to 193. While when the final customer registration is hidden that has some sense, I don't see the point at changing the registration to the serial number when the final registration is clearly readable in the tail.

    regards,

    Santiago.

    Leave a comment:


  • JuklicekCZ
    replied
    Originally posted by ErwinS View Post
    Aircraft is available under Homebuilt Aircraft as Paja
    Thanks, she is accepted.

    Leave a comment:

Working...
X