A Quick Reference Guide to Categories

[ErwinS]

According to the upload guidelines, all planes in museums need this category:

Ok check

[Bruce]

Should a CCF Harvard Mk 4 be a "small prop" or just "warbird" only?

[ErwinS]

Should a CCF Harvard Mk 4 be a "small prop" or just "warbird" only?

Since she is the same a/c as a North American T-6 Texan - "Vintage/Warbird" Only

[Bruce]

Since she is the same a/c as a North American T-6 Texan - "Vintage/Warbird" Only

Ok, Thanks!

[SIA_744]

Military, yes. But, judging by other photos of gevernment owned civilian aircraft, do not select business jet. Other examples: Germany's A310, A340 in France, ...

Cheerio

Hello,

I've had a rejection for overex/wrong category:

http://www.jetphotos.net/viewreject_b.php?id=4426761

I appealed and the appeal got rejected as well with the following comment:

Admin Comments >> business jet category is required

I don't think A6-YAS falls under business jet category? It's an UAE government 747

[ErwinS]

Hello,

I've had a rejection for overex/wrong category:

http://www.jetphotos.net/viewreject_b.php?id=4426761

I appealed and the appeal got rejected as well with the following comment:

Admin Comments >> business jet category is required

I don't think A6-YAS falls under business jet category? It's an UAE government 747

Zaahid,

Government aircraft are considered buisiness jets in our dbase.


Rgds

[stawka]

I;ve got two rejects due to category wrong/missing. I can't check which categories were added, so I suppose both had "military" checked:

http://www.jetphotos.net/viewreject_b.php?id=4478564

http://www.jetphotos.net/viewreject_b.php?id=4475999

Should I:
- NOT add "military" and add "bussiness jet" to the first (USCG Gulfstream),
- add "military" (cause it is US Air Force) and add "bussiness jet" to the second (USAF C-40B) ,
am I right?

[ErwinS]

I;ve got two rejects due to category wrong/missing. I can't check which categories were added, so I suppose both had "military" checked:

http://www.jetphotos.net/viewreject_b.php?id=4478564

http://www.jetphotos.net/viewreject_b.php?id=4475999

Should I:
- NOT add "military" and add "bussiness jet" to the first (USCG Gulfstream),
- add "military" (cause it is US Air Force) and add "bussiness jet" to the second (USAF C-40B) ,
am I right?

Both need Mil genre and Bizjet category selected.

[AJ]

The 'Air-to-air' category has many photos of aircraft on the ground, taken from the air.

Surely they don't fit in this category, or should it be renamed the 'from the air' category?

[ErwinS]

Hi AJ,

You are right. Thnx for the corrections.

Kind rgds,

[hongmng]

Hi

Should Norwegian Air Shuttle planes with people on tails be "Special Scheme"? I did a search in database with no conclusive results: searching with the special category resulted in 1000+ photos, while searching the whole airline resulted in 9000+ photos, many of which I discovered had people on the tail but was not in the special category.

Help please
Thanks

[Mr Chips]

Hi

Should Norwegian Air Shuttle planes with people on tails be "Special Scheme"? I did a search in database with no conclusive results: searching with the special category resulted in 1000+ photos, while searching the whole airline resulted in 9000+ photos, many of which I discovered had people on the tail but was not in the special category.

Help please
Thanks

No, Norwegian 737's should not be uploaded with the special scheme category. They do however have a few aircraft that do require the special scheme category, from memory they are aircraft advertising wifi onboard, UNICEF, and another being the 6000th 737 delivered.

[brianw999]

There are also some around with no fin painting. These are not special scheme either, they are simply a unpainted hybrid.

[hongmng]

Ok. Thanks Dave and Brian!

[RCoulter]

Should 'Small Prop' be checked for the GAAS MQ-1 Predator UAV?