Announcement

Collapse
No announcement yet.

A Quick Reference Guide to Categories

Collapse
This is a sticky topic.
X
X
 
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts

  • bluebee
    replied
    Hello,

    got a rejection due to "bad info - airline" https://www.jetphotos.com/viewqueued_b.php?id=8414762
    The picture shows a brand-new registration for an old cn but the registration was a former fleet-registration of an authority. At the tail is the old company-logo of a former owner, who operated this aircraft simply for his company.All other infos are correct, I did research and found out the former registration and owner.
    I took "unknown" because the current new owner is private and unknown, but still no airline. So what to choose?

    Leave a comment:


  • LX-A343
    replied
    Originally posted by RFS1393 View Post
    Hello, this aircraft is considered small prop? https://www.jetphotos.com/photo/9724341


    thanks
    Nope

    Leave a comment:


  • RFS1393
    replied
    Hello, this aircraft is considered small prop? https://www.jetphotos.com/photo/9724341


    thanks

    Leave a comment:


  • NZDN_spotting
    replied
    With the standard C208/208B config being 12/13 pax (single or dual pilot), shouldn't it be no categories?

    Leave a comment:


  • Bruce
    replied
    Originally posted by dlowwa View Post
    Yes.
    Thanks!

    Leave a comment:


  • dlowwa
    replied
    Originally posted by Bruce View Post
    Southwest Airlines' gold colored Herbert D. Kelleher 737 N711HK - would that be considered a special color scheme?
    Yes.

    Leave a comment:


  • Bruce
    replied
    Southwest Airlines' gold colored Herbert D. Kelleher 737 N711HK - would that be considered a special color scheme?

    Leave a comment:


  • Guji.RPMD
    replied
    Is the Beechcraft Musketeer a Vintage or just a Small Prop?

    Leave a comment:


  • ErwinS
    replied
    Originally posted by ArkadyAP View Post
    Is Bombardier Learjet 36A only a Business Jet?
    https://www.jetphotos.com/viewqueued_b.php?id=7276304
    Yes only bizjet

    Leave a comment:


  • ArkadyAP
    replied
    Thank you

    Regards,
    Arkady

    Leave a comment:


  • Alex - Spot-This !
    replied
    Yes but you probably missed night shot category

    Regards
    Alex

    Leave a comment:


  • ArkadyAP
    replied
    Is Bombardier Learjet 36A only a Business Jet?
    https://www.jetphotos.com/viewqueued_b.php?id=7276304

    Leave a comment:


  • Dysko
    replied
    Originally posted by ErwinS View Post
    Correct. A full scale replica is indeed still a warbird/vintage. Scalled down not since the are completly new aircraft and just look a likes of historic aircraft.
    Perfect, got it! Thank you very much, Erwin!

    Leave a comment:


  • ErwinS
    replied
    Originally posted by Dysko View Post
    Some months ago, I uploaded a photo of a ULM replica of a P-51 Mustang as "Warbird", but it was rejected for "Bad info" with the screener saying that it did not apply for "Warbird" category.
    The airplane in question was a Loehle 5151 Mustang, registration I-5151: https://www.jetphotos.com/registration/I-5151

    Some days ago I uploaded photos of WW1 ULM replicas flown by Pterodactyl Flight at Poznan Air Show 2018. Remembering my previous rejection, I did not upload them as "Warbird", explaining my motives in the screener comments.

    However, today I discovered that upload guidelines say:


    Now I'm a bit confused... does this mean that only replicas which are visibly scaled down (as in the case of the Loehle Mustang and the other WW1 replicas I have in the queue) do not need the "Warbird" category, while full-scale replicas do?

    To help you, the other replicas I'm referring to are:
    OK-HUP02: https://www.jetphotos.com/registration/OK-HUP02
    OK-HUI04: https://www.jetphotos.com/registration/OK-HUI04
    OK-UAA90: https://www.jetphotos.com/registration/OK-UAA90
    OK-TAV58: https://www.jetphotos.com/registration/OK-TAV58

    Thank you very much
    Correct. A full scale replica is indeed still a warbird/vintage. Scalled down not since the are completly new aircraft and just look a likes of historic aircraft.

    Leave a comment:


  • Dysko
    replied
    Some months ago, I uploaded a photo of a ULM replica of a P-51 Mustang as "Warbird", but it was rejected for "Bad info" with the screener saying that it did not apply for "Warbird" category.
    The airplane in question was a Loehle 5151 Mustang, registration I-5151: https://www.jetphotos.com/registration/I-5151

    Some days ago I uploaded photos of WW1 ULM replicas flown by Pterodactyl Flight at Poznan Air Show 2018. Remembering my previous rejection, I did not upload them as "Warbird", explaining my motives in the screener comments.

    However, today I discovered that upload guidelines say:
    Warbird / Vintage
    This category is to be selected for old planes (anything that was not built after 1970, or where the production started before 1970), planes that are no longer in regular service and planes in museums. Also, replicas of vintage aircraft need the "vintage" category.
    Now I'm a bit confused... does this mean that only replicas which are visibly scaled down (as in the case of the Loehle Mustang and the other WW1 replicas I have in the queue) do not need the "Warbird" category, while full-scale replicas do?

    To help you, the other replicas I'm referring to are:
    OK-HUP02: https://www.jetphotos.com/registration/OK-HUP02
    OK-HUI04: https://www.jetphotos.com/registration/OK-HUI04
    OK-UAA90: https://www.jetphotos.com/registration/OK-UAA90
    OK-TAV58: https://www.jetphotos.com/registration/OK-TAV58

    Thank you very much

    Leave a comment:

Working...
X