A Quick Reference Guide to Categories

[ErwinS]

Is there any category needed to be ticked for an image of a Boeing 737-500? The aircraft is already almost 30 years old. Please tell me if there's anything needed to be ticked thanks!

No category needed

[Stanley JH]

Is there any category needed to be ticked for an image of a Boeing 737-500? The aircraft is already almost 30 years old. Please tell me if there's anything needed to be ticked thanks!

[brianw999]

Is a KC-135 supposed to be cargo category?

No.

[Bruce]

Is a KC-135 supposed to be cargo category?

[JuklicekCZ]

A very good question! I just wondered if jetphotos is the best platform to talk about Turboprops.

Greetings.

Well, that reminds me of another question, Is jetphotos a good site for uploading glider photos?
And I do not mean gliders, that are equipped with a jet engine.
And also, are gliders equipped with a retractable propeller considered a small prop?
Potentially, the small prop question can even apply to ME-163 Komet as it is equiped with a really tiny propeller, but maybe Komet would require a special "Tiny Prop" category.

[LH-B744]

I’m trying to submit a photo of a turbo-prop aircraft to the queue, but I’m confused weather or not I should tick the small prop box.

thank you!

A very good question! I just wondered if jetphotos is the best platform to talk about Turboprops.

And you just gave me the answer. Yes!

Honestly, I have never in my life tried to seriously upload one jetphoto to the jetphotos queue (!) . My being here is rather defined by.. knowledge about my home airport,
and knowledge about my favorite airline, and knowledge about my favorite aircraft. All three are to be found in my avatar, or in my signature.

Is a Beech B200 still a small prop?

By range I'd say, no. A twin propeller with more than 1000 nautical miles range in my eyes is no longer small.

So, how do we define a small propeller. Up to 10 passenger seats. And what about an Antonov An-2P. No twin turboprop, and no turboprop at all, but designed for up to 12 passengers
(according to wikipedia).

In my eyes, a Beech B200 is rather a small twin turboprop, but I'd not decide for 'small prop' in case of the B200 .

Good to see that this platform, which I love so very much since almost 14 years, is also good for propeller talk .

Greetings.

[Vic Diesel]

I'm pondering whether the Piaggio Avanti is "small prop" or not. My instinct would say "no" (twin prop in a genuinely bizjet-role), but the guidelines say props designed for up to 10 pax ARE "small" (the P180 is built for 7-8 pax).

Your advice?

[RobertMahar15]

Hi,

Small prop category goes by the size of the aircraft.

As per the upload guidelines:

Small Prop
To be used for small props which have been designed for up to 10 passengers.

Kind Regards,

Thimo van Dijk

thank you so much.!…silly me, my first instinct should have been to look at the upload guidelines, but once again thank you.

[Thimo]

Hi,

Small prop category goes by the size of the aircraft.

As per the upload guidelines:

Small Prop
To be used for small props which have been designed for up to 10 passengers.

Kind Regards,

Thimo van Dijk

[RobertMahar15]

I’m trying to submit a photo of a turbo-prop aircraft to the queue, but I’m confused weather or not I should tick the small prop box.

thank you!

[Lat1918]

Would a C-40A be considered a business jet if its registered to the USN?
Thank you in advance

[bluebee]

Yep, you're right. During each new session after a while I always have fingertrouble finding through the categories... Today at a 2nd trial I've found the right one for the picture mentioned above.

[LX-A343]

Hello,

got a rejection due to "bad info - airline" https://www.jetphotos.com/viewqueued_b.php?id=8414762
The picture shows a brand-new registration for an old cn but the registration was a former fleet-registration of an authority. At the tail is the old company-logo of a former owner, who operated this aircraft simply for his company.All other infos are correct, I did research and found out the former registration and owner.
I took "unknown" because the current new owner is private and unknown, but still no airline. So what to choose?

You answered your question yourself : upload it as "Private"

[bluebee]

Hello,

got a rejection due to "bad info - airline" https://www.jetphotos.com/viewqueued_b.php?id=8414762
The picture shows a brand-new registration for an old cn but the registration was a former fleet-registration of an authority. At the tail is the old company-logo of a former owner, who operated this aircraft simply for his company.All other infos are correct, I did research and found out the former registration and owner.
I took "unknown" because the current new owner is private and unknown, but still no airline. So what to choose?

[LX-A343]

Hello, this aircraft is considered small prop? https://www.jetphotos.com/photo/9724341


thanks

Nope