Announcement

Collapse
No announcement yet.

Corrections to images in the database.

Collapse
This is a sticky topic.
X
X
 
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts

  • clintbonnie
    replied
    Hey Brain..Image is in error... can't figure how to change the image of this Piper PA 28-181 This plane is being used to train student pilots in Ellensburg, Wa... the image on Flight Tracker and JetPhotos websites shows a ..Dassault Falcon 50 - 23.. Understand these plane images from JetPhotos.. Can you change it ? thx..
    REF: https://www.flightradar24.com/N523CW/10574f0b

    Leave a comment:


  • ErwinS
    replied
    Originally posted by Segi View Post
    Dear,
    After reading the comment on this picture https://www.jetphotos.com/photo/8836151
    I checked further on Google and it is correct that the Tornado is an ADV
    https://abpic.co.uk/pictures/view/1172639
    http://www.airport-data.com/aircraft/2915.html
    I guess I was mislead by the C/N "DS009".

    This being said, I tried to correct but the ADV is not proposed in the list of Tornado.
    Could an admin please help me to correct?

    Thank you in advance and best regards
    It is an F.3 Corrected

    Leave a comment:


  • Segi
    replied
    Dear,
    After reading the comment on this picture https://www.jetphotos.com/photo/8836151
    I checked further on Google and it is correct that the Tornado is an ADV
    https://abpic.co.uk/pictures/view/1172639
    http://www.airport-data.com/aircraft/2915.html
    I guess I was mislead by the C/N "DS009".

    This being said, I tried to correct but the ADV is not proposed in the list of Tornado.
    Could an admin please help me to correct?

    Thank you in advance and best regards

    Leave a comment:


  • brianw999
    replied
    Originally posted by jeremydando View Post
    Hello;

    Can the location on 8830925 be fixed? I tried to change it, but I can not. It should be at KMSP, Minneapolis, Minnesota USA. Thank you
    Changed as requested.

    Leave a comment:


  • jeremydando
    replied
    Hello;

    Can the location on 8830925 be fixed? I tried to change it, but I can not. It should be at KMSP, Minneapolis, Minnesota USA. Thank you

    Leave a comment:


  • ErwinS
    replied
    Originally posted by glidescopeAviation View Post
    https://www.jetphotos.com/photo/8828366

    the date is wrong on this 1. Taken on 07/01/2018
    corrected

    Leave a comment:


  • glidescopeAviation
    replied
    https://www.jetphotos.com/photo/8828366

    the date is wrong on this 1. Taken on 07/01/2018

    Leave a comment:


  • brianw999
    replied
    Originally posted by Erenerol View Post
    Hello,

    I noticed that there are some date errors in my recent uploads. I think they are due to residual data of previous uploads in blanks. It would be good if you could correct these ones below. Thank you.

    ID : 8740740 Date : 6 August 2017
    ID : 8740735 Date : 5 August 2017
    ID : 8733973 Date : 3 August 2017
    ID : 8728251 Date : 5 August 2017
    ID : 8727153 Date : 12 June 2016
    All done

    Leave a comment:


  • Erenerol
    replied
    Hello,

    I noticed that there are some date errors in my recent uploads. I think they are due to residual data of previous uploads in blanks. It would be good if you could correct these ones below. Thank you.

    ID : 8740740 Date : 6 August 2017
    ID : 8740735 Date : 5 August 2017
    ID : 8733973 Date : 3 August 2017
    ID : 8728251 Date : 5 August 2017
    ID : 8727153 Date : 12 June 2016

    Leave a comment:


  • airbum
    replied
    Thank you very much - I shall do my best to improve my ticking

    Leave a comment:


  • ErwinS
    replied
    Originally posted by airbum View Post
    Just a few that would benefit of having Vintage added:

    https://www.jetphotos.com/photo/8689379
    https://www.jetphotos.com/photo/8684709
    https://www.jetphotos.com/photo/8572353
    https://www.jetphotos.com/photo/8569188
    https://www.jetphotos.com/photo/8553007
    https://www.jetphotos.com/photo/8685455

    The rest is mostly Piper Cubs etc, but could the above be ticked vintage I would be grateful
    MTIA
    Erik
    They are added, together with some small prop categories

    Leave a comment:


  • airbum
    replied
    Just a few that would benefit of having Vintage added:

    https://www.jetphotos.com/photo/8689379
    https://www.jetphotos.com/photo/8684709
    https://www.jetphotos.com/photo/8572353
    https://www.jetphotos.com/photo/8569188
    https://www.jetphotos.com/photo/8553007
    https://www.jetphotos.com/photo/8685455

    The rest is mostly Piper Cubs etc, but could the above be ticked vintage I would be grateful
    MTIA
    Erik

    Leave a comment:


  • airbum
    replied
    Been going over my profile, and found I have missed ticking the "vintage" box on 21 images. Can I correct them? Or may I send you the pages to be updated? - If it is considered not to be important I will leave them as is.
    MTIA
    Erik

    Leave a comment:


  • ErwinS
    replied
    The system reads the exif automaticly. So the exif is ok unless its manipulated to get another date.

    Leave a comment:


  • Segi
    replied
    Dear, I don't know why this time the Exif was not read properly but there was a mistake in the date the photo was taken
    https://www.jetphotos.com/photo/8685881 was taken on 29 June 2017 (with this one https://www.jetphotos.com/photo/8653039 )
    Not very important but I like to reflect actual fact.
    Thank you to update when possible.
    Last edited by Segi; 2017-09-01, 05:52. Reason: Typo

    Leave a comment:

Working...
X