Announcement

Collapse
No announcement yet.

New screeners needed - 2020

Collapse
This is a sticky topic.
X
X
 
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts

  • DWC1981
    replied
    Originally posted by dlowwa View Post

    Well..



    68% < 80%, no?

    You're still welcome to apply, but a ratio under 80% is not going to help. Maybe take a little time and put some effort into improving that ratio and think about applying in the future?
    Ok thank you

    Leave a comment:


  • Alex - Spot-This !
    replied
    We'll be closing the applications at the end of the month so only a few days left

    Leave a comment:


  • LH-B744
    replied
    New screeners needed?

    Really? But who has left us?

    Nevertheless. It rather seems as if Alex already knows all the candidates for years... But if you ask me, there is nothing wrong in this procedure.

    Leave a comment:


  • Alex - Spot-This !
    replied
    Originally posted by Brenden S View Post
    Alex, I would be happy to come back if you will let me.
    I'll PM you, thanks !

    Leave a comment:


  • Brenden S
    replied
    Alex, I would be happy to come back if you will let me.

    Leave a comment:


  • Alex - Spot-This !
    replied
    we are up to 33 applications now, Thank you all !!

    Leave a comment:


  • Alex - Spot-This !
    replied
    Please don't forget to include a link to your profile with your email, thank you !

    We have already received 16 applications, thanks a lot !!

    Leave a comment:


  • dlowwa
    replied
    Originally posted by wkd001 View Post
    I have two questions

    My acceptance ratio is around 86%, but unfortunately decreased a little due to trying some little less quality photos and some stupid rejects (my own fault), due to quarantaine rules .
    Now we're allowed to go out more again. checking my latest photos, iexpect to increase the ratio again.
    86% is fine. Most of the crew is over 90%, but a few percentage points lost here or there is not a big deal. We're looking for overall consistency in quality (and being able to recognize such)

    Originally posted by wkd001 View Post
    What's an acceptable portfolio? I'm at 984 at the moment, but feeling yself a rookie sometimes compared to fellow photographers with for example 10000+ photos in de DB.
    Also more than acceptable. Anything over 500 images in the DB should be considered as a minimum portfolio, so 984 is totally fine.

    Leave a comment:


  • wkd001
    replied
    I have two questions

    My acceptance ratio is around 86%, but unfortunately decreased a little due to trying some little less quality photos and some stupid rejects (my own fault), due to quarantaine rules .
    Now we're allowed to go out more again. checking my latest photos, iexpect to increase the ratio again.
    There are some points in rejects reasons, I wouldn't recognise, Could that be explained, if I would apply (one example is compression)
    What's an acceptable portfolio? I'm at 984 at the moment, but feeling yself a rookie sometimes compared to fellow photographers with for example 10000+ photos in de DB.

    Thanks in advance.

    Best Regards,

    Wilko

    Leave a comment:


  • Michael Rodeback
    replied
    Originally posted by dlowwa View Post

    Unfortunately we've had some..maturity issues.. with people in the past, so we would like to keep it above 18 for the time being. Maybe continue to work improving your acceptance ratio, and as I suggested above, think about applying in the future?
    Ok. Thanks dlowwa.

    Leave a comment:


  • dlowwa
    replied
    Originally posted by Michael Rodeback View Post
    I'm interested. I do have a couple questions though. I'm under 18, but would parental approval work for you? Second, my acceptance ratio at the time of writing is 71.26%. Two years ago, I had a very bad camera, and a poor skill set. I had something like 100 rejections with that camera, so if we disregard those I'm sure my acceptance ratio would be around 80%. Could this work for you?

    Many thanks,
    Michael
    Unfortunately we've had some..maturity issues.. with people in the past, so we would like to keep it above 18 for the time being. Maybe continue to work improving your acceptance ratio, and as I suggested above, think about applying in the future?

    Leave a comment:


  • dlowwa
    replied
    Originally posted by DWC1981 View Post
    Would I qualify at 68%
    Well..

    Originally posted by Alex - Spot-This ! View Post
    over 80%, the higher the best
    68% < 80%, no?

    You're still welcome to apply, but a ratio under 80% is not going to help. Maybe take a little time and put some effort into improving that ratio and think about applying in the future?

    Leave a comment:


  • Michael Rodeback
    replied
    I'm interested. I do have a couple questions though. I'm under 18, but would parental approval work for you? Second, my acceptance ratio at the time of writing is 71.26%. Two years ago, I had a very bad camera, and a poor skill set. I had something like 100 rejections with that camera, so if we disregard those I'm sure my acceptance ratio would be around 80%. Could this work for you?

    Many thanks,
    Michael

    Leave a comment:


  • DWC1981
    replied
    Would I qualify at 68%

    Leave a comment:


  • janamparikh
    replied
    Originally posted by dlowwa View Post

    Unfortunately, it will be one of the main factors in considering candidates, so a poor acceptance ratio can't be considered as an exception. If you're going to be a judge of the quality of other people's photos, you should at least be able to judge the quality of your own, no?
    Agreed to it, hence I mentioned the same. Cheers!

    Leave a comment:

Working...
X