Announcement

Collapse
No announcement yet.

Telephoto & system choices

Collapse
X
 
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts

  • Felix448
    replied
    Hi, yeah I´ve been thinking about that option. I see a few downsides though:

    1. Quality degrades + possibly worse Autofocus
    2. Hassle of dealing with the adapter + extender + lens
    3. Another investment in EF glass

    The last point is a bit of a mixed bag, there are a lot of people currently selling their EF stuff, so picking up an Extender might be quite cheap & easy. But if I buy a different tele lens for RF in the next.. lets say 2-3 years (maybe if Sigma or Tamron have jumped in until then), selling it will be even more difficult than the lens alone.

    Leave a comment:


  • B7772ADL
    replied
    Have you considered a 1.4x extender for your existing 100-400? Maybe something to think about if you don't need the extra reach all the time.

    Leave a comment:


  • Felix448
    started a topic Telephoto & system choices

    Telephoto & system choices

    Hello!

    I´m seeking for some opinions on the choice of a telephoto lens and what system to go with. First a bit of introduction into my current gear:

    Back in 2019 I purchased a Canon EOS R and about a year later, got hold of a Canon 100-400mm L lens. I`ve basically been using this combo for a longer while, but figured 400mm is not quite enough at some places. Airports with designated spotting areas are mostly fine with this range, but there are a few that I generally like to visit where 400mm is simply on the edge. This leads either to a lot of cropping or unusable photos in general. Also, at airshows that involve a lot of smaller jets / warbirds etc, more zoom would be helpful to fill the frame. I´ve tried the 100-400 on a 7D II which makes the range much more useable, maybe except for being a little too much for close objects.

    Now, winter promotions and cashbacks are mostly live and also the A7 IV was recently released. Also, Fuji has a very compelling entry with the X-T4.

    Sony, especially together with Tamron also have 2 very interesting lens options for full-frame telephoto. The Sony 200-600mm f5.6-6.3 as well as the Tamron 150-500mm f5-6.7.

    My problem is that I still have some other Canon glass and the 100-400, generally speaking, is a very nice lens. The R6 is much better than the R for tracking fast objects/wildlife and it has a nice cashback bonus. It´s also quite a bit faster than the A7 and I´m used to the system compared to Sony/Fuji.

    I´ve been thinking about 3 options now, but simply cant really decide which route to go.

    a) Stick with Canon, pick up the R6 and go with what I got at the moment. This would save me a good amount of hassle trying to sell stuff and setting up from the start. In comparison though, I´d still be missing reach on the telephoto end.

    b) Entirely sell the Canon setup and go for the A7 IV with either the Tamron or Sony lens I mentioned above (both are only 100-200€ apart). I´d probably prefer the 150-500 here as 150 isnt too extreme on the short end and 500 still giving me a boost where the 33 MP of the A7 would if necessary still provide some level of cropping power.

    c) Entirely sell the Canon setup and go with Fuji. The X-T4 looks like it has good tracking capabilites and also has a pretty fast burst rate. Their 100-400mm would pretty much equal the 7D + 100-400 combo while giving me the advantages of a mirrorless system and reducing size.

    By the way, if anyone is missing the 150-600mm lenses from Sigma/Tamron in this post, it´s because I dont like both of them. I was able to try the Tamron G2 on one occasion but I feel like these lenses are more suited for DSLRs. I´ve noticed some AF problems and the zoom ring cant be turned quickly / is quite stiff.


    Have you got any opinions or advices that can help to make a decision? I´d appreciate any input on the topic!

    Best Regards,
    Felix
Working...
X