Announcement
Collapse
No announcement yet.
Appealed a rejected photo - but missed the answered E-mail
Collapse
X
-
So first you said : To my humble opinion that is best of this unique plane possible picture. Having said that, must add that the picture was rejected within one minute after upload � so did not have enough time to check the outcome.
One minute is way enough to check a photo.... If it was more the JP model would be totally impossible.
and the reply to the appeal was :
there was plenty of time to see what the problem were on this image and the 3 given reasons are definitely correct - Regards
Please let me take a chance to ask you why you appealed it ? While I agree the cut-off is questionnable, the 2 other reasons are really not questionnable
- Dark (confirmed by histogram, if you see such an histogram, don't appeal please)
- Soft... check all the parts, see how soft some are ? like the wheels or wings ?
Appeals are EXTREMELY time consuming, please try to only appeal if ALL rejection reasons are questionnable which is extremely rare when there 3+ reasons given...
Have a nice day
Alex
-
Originally posted by Alex - Spot-This ! View PostSo first you said : To my humble opinion that is best of this unique plane possible picture. Having said that, must add that the picture was rejected within one minute after upload � so did not have enough time to check the outcome.
One minute is way enough to check a photo.... If it was more the JP model would be totally impossible.
and the reply to the appeal was :
there was plenty of time to see what the problem were on this image and the 3 given reasons are definitely correct - Regards
Please let me take a chance to ask you why you appealed it ? While I agree the cut-off is questionnable, the 2 other reasons are really not questionnable
- Dark (confirmed by histogram, if you see such an histogram, don't appeal please)
- Soft... check all the parts, see how soft some are ? like the wheels or wings ?
Appeals are EXTREMELY time consuming, please try to only appeal if ALL rejection reasons are questionnable which is extremely rare when there 3+ reasons given...
Have a nice day
Alex
I did not see the answered E-mail to the appeal, so appreciated the time taken to answer me here.
1. As for the time between my upload, while added the watermark - there was not sufficient interval of time to check the picture.
2. Looking at the histogram, the dark part of the histogram is due to the wall behind the plane. The fuselage and engine part are in fine contrast to the gray walls, that's why I took the decision to appeal.
3. Sharpness is fair on this - but can't argue, you may see different and I can accept your judgement.
Sorry to consume the time of the screeners for the appeal, just had a point or two on this picture, and that's why there is an "appeal" tab for that matter.
Sincerely,
Ike Harel
Comment
Comment