Announcement

Collapse
No announcement yet.

75-300 NON USM+300D...

Collapse
X
 
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts

  • #16
    Not much wrong with the moon shot.

    Most reviews say that this lens is fine up to 250mm and then starts to lose it.
    I have also bought an 75-300mm USM IS recently and so far can't complain if you work within its limits. As already suggested try not to go below f8. As far as L glass is conerned , great if you have the money but in my opinion if you buy Canon you pay a premium for the brand. I suspect thet Sigma offer similar quality for lower cost??


    Comment


    • #17
      Someone feels stupid for saying the Canon 75-300 could't hold its shite


      Another 75-300 shot that "sucks"





      -Adam

      (Because i dont need to plug the jp.net version )

      Comment


      • #18
        Originally posted by DeltaASA16
        (Because i dont need to plug the jp.net version )
        Did that shot even get accepted here? The nose looks pretty blurry. :P

        J/K! Great shot!
        Will F.
        Photos: JetPhotos.Net | Airliners.net | General Photography

        Comment


        • #19
          All i can say is Thanks! i'm now sorted with the lense and as the link didn't work before here is a shot i managed with it.


          Click Here to view my pathetic attempts at Aviation photography!
          View the Darkside

          Comment

          Working...
          X