Announcement

Collapse
No announcement yet.

Hot photo use reminder!!

Collapse
This is a sticky topic.
X
X
 
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts

  • Dan380
    replied
    I have a photo of SilverJet's new aircraft G-SILC, there are no pics of it on JP but I realise it is their 3rd 767. I was just wondering if it was different for an airline like SilverJet?

    Also, there is a rainbow in the background.

    Leave a comment:


  • Petertenthije
    replied
    OK, so I uploaded a hot photo, and it got accepted very quicly indeed (thanks!). Now I wonder when something gets the newsticker treatment? I had expected this to go there but no such luck.




    http://www.jetphotos.net/viewphoto.p...6051002&nseq=0

    Leave a comment:


  • Rjuncker
    replied
    Originally posted by LX-A343
    Usually we expect the same quality standards also for hot photos. Exceptions could be photos, which we probably would not see again. But let's say, the first A380 in Emirates colors (just as an example) should meet the minimum quality standards, simply, because we know, we will be flood by a gazillion of top shots, so why accept a bad photo first?
    Gerardo
    Hmmm.... I would like to bring the attention to this picture, uploaded by a friend. He put it in the hot qeue. It's a new paint scheme, but according to the statement quoted above, why would it get accepted? Now I'm not a screener, but a few things come to mind: Foreground clutter, underexposed, aircraft cut off, obstructions, horizon unlevel and aircraft not centered.

    Here's the pic: http://www.jetphotos.net/viewphoto.p...6024644&nseq=0

    I'm pretty sure we'll see a gazillion of SQ Cargo in the new paint scheme as well, so why accept a bad photo first?

    I'm not gonna go into the discussion about what makes for a hot photo or not, but I would like to make a sugestion. Since it seems that some people use the hot qeue to - for lack of better words - jump the regular qeue, would it be an idea to make a new rejection category? The picture itself could be accepted based on the overall quality, but still be rejected because it does not qualify for a hot photo. Of course, a photo that is rejected for that reason, will still be eligible for upload in the normal qeue. Maybe that would inspire people to be more "selective" about what they put in the hot qeue. It's a bit annoying when you see pictures from certain places be accepted 2-3 days before yours even though they are ordinary pictures, taken on the same day.

    Anyway, just a thougt. Now I'm ready for the pounding from you guys.

    Leave a comment:


  • NeilA330
    replied
    Oh, ok thanks

    Leave a comment:


  • seahawk
    replied
    If you uploaded them as hot and they were not rejected, then they were accpeted as hot. But they were not seen as ticker worthy.

    Leave a comment:


  • NeilA330
    replied
    I uploaded 3 photos, 2 of CX new first class, and 1 one CX new business class.
    I uploaded them as hot because AJ said that it was.
    They were accepted but not as hot. Im not trying to get hits or anything im just wondering for future refference if all screeners have to agree that it is hot or not?

    Cheers
    Neil.

    Leave a comment:


  • NeilA330
    replied
    Thanks for heads-up AJ!

    Leave a comment:


  • AJ
    replied
    I would say yes Neil.

    Leave a comment:


  • NeilA330
    replied
    Does a new interior count?
    For example the first pictures of the New Bizz class, and first class product for an airline?

    Leave a comment:


  • Will M
    replied
    What did you put as the reason for being HOT ??

    "first flight into Newark" wouldn't count yet "Inaugural flight" would......

    Leave a comment:


  • NJGTR82
    replied
    I have a question regarding hot uploads, I uploaded a shot of Jet Airways first arrival into EWR today as hot and it was rejected. SO why was this an ok hot when it departed Brussles? http://www.jetphotos.net/viewphoto.p...6031433&nseq=4

    Bill

    Leave a comment:


  • brianw999
    replied
    Quoting Omar....

    We have many uploaders who try to fool us with the reasons why their photo should be hot.
    Are people really that sad ?

    Jesus H, its a hobby, not a deadline breaking, mega-bucks paying, hold the front page, I'll die if I don't get it in NOW, situation.

    To quote Omar again...

    But I do also think that it's not too hard to wait 2-3 days to have your pics online, at JP we really work like hell to keep the queue low so you don't have to wait 7-10 days (cough cough) to get your pics screened (no I didn't say rejected !! )
    Nasty cough there Omar ? caused by an allergy to vegetables perchance, especially "Swedes".

    Leave a comment:


  • Paul Maier
    replied
    oliver, its not going to happen. move on.

    Leave a comment:


  • ollieholmes
    replied
    Originally posted by seahawk
    I also wonder what is so special about "Glacier Girl" flying in England. Sure it is a nice historic sidenote, but surely not ticker worthy hot.
    Look here:
    http://www.airshowbuzz.com/videos/browse.php?featured=1
    SAdly the forums there are down at the moment otherwise id send you a link to the massive thread on her. 'Glacier girl' did not make it anyway, she blew a cylinder case and is stuck.

    Leave a comment:


  • ollieholmes
    replied
    Originally posted by AJ
    I a bit confused as to what you found ambiguous in Will's answer Oliver? Perhaps he wasn't clear enough as you uploaded it as 'hot' anyway.
    I dont see why the rules should be one for commercial and another for the warbirds/vintage.

    Leave a comment:

Working...
X