Announcement

Collapse
No announcement yet.

Hot photo use reminder!!

Collapse
This is a sticky topic.
X
X
 
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts

  • #61
    Depends. Another P-51, rather not. A BF-110, P-47, P-40 or Wildcat or FW190. If there are no previous pics of the bird in the db, then it is worth a try.

    Comment


    • #62
      Hi,

      I recently had a "hot" rejection (among other reasons) of a bizjet. The upload was under the "hot" category not because of a new reg for JP, but because it was a very recently built aircraft. It was built in Dec. 2007 and deliviered to its current (unkown) owner and registered by the end of June, less than 2 months ago. I thought that would qualify as hot being a new aircraft (but not a new model)? If not, what am I not getting (yes, I AM stupid! )

      Thanx and I appologize to the screeners for me using the hot feature in the wrong way, I know it takes time off your work .. sorry!

      regards

      Comment


      • #63
        G'day All,

        Just so I hopefully don't waste the screeners time in the fututre;

        What about something like a new deployment of visiting millitary jets to your local airport?

        For example, we had some Singaporean F-16s visit Williamtown last year. Would it be ok to submit the first images I get of something like that as hot photos (if it happens in the future, not for last years F-16 photos)?

        Cheers and thanks for the help.
        Motty.

        Comment


        • #64
          Originally posted by Motty
          What about something like a new deployment of visiting millitary jets to your local airport?

          For example, we had some Singaporean F-16s visit Williamtown last year. Would it be ok to submit the first images I get of something like that as hot photos
          I can totally understand the excitement such an event/sight generates however it wouldnt constitute a hot photo.

          Cheers - Vishal

          Comment


          • #65
            Originally posted by Vishal Jolapara
            I can totally understand the excitement such an event/sight generates however it wouldnt constitute a hot photo.

            Cheers - Vishal
            No worries.

            Thanks for the help Vishal.

            Cheers,
            Motty.

            Comment


            • #66
              Hi everyone... it says that a photo is hot when is't about a new type of aircraft for an airliner.

              So, If an airliner have a couple of A319-112 but it receives a third one type A319-115 and this one has some differences about the -112 type it would be a Hot photo?

              I'm confused about this because someone says that an aircraft with brand new winglets it would be hot, so I think that in this case, the new A319 it'd be a hot photo... wouldn't be?

              thanks a lot.

              Gatto
              _______________________________

              Will I ever repeat this?

              Comment


              • #67
                Nope, an A319-115 after a -112 is not a hot photo. First aircraft with winglets in a fleet, for example the first B738 with winglets, has been accepted as hot in the past.
                My photos on Flickr www.flickr.com/photos/geridominguez

                Comment


                • #68
                  Originally posted by LX-A343 View Post
                  Nope, an A319-115 after a -112 is not a hot photo. First aircraft with winglets in a fleet, for example the first B738 with winglets, has been accepted as hot in the past.
                  thanks, very clear.

                  cheers
                  _______________________________

                  Will I ever repeat this?

                  Comment


                  • #69
                    Inaugural MEL-LAX run

                    Dear Screeners,

                    Will the Inaugural MEL-LAX run (first revenue flight) of Qantas A380 (VH-OQA) be counted as hot?

                    Regards,
                    Mehdi.

                    Comment


                    • #70
                      OOPS! I am so sorry, Tom I may have spammed your inbox with a letter before I actually checked my que results. I am so, so, so, sorry. If there was a decent blush emoticon... Put it this way, I owe you beer.
                      Last edited by Powercube; 2008-11-04, 20:49.

                      Comment


                      • #71
                        So I uploaded this as a hot photo Back in January: http://www.jetphotos.net/viewphoto.php?id=6465473

                        I asked if it could be added to the ticker page. It wasn't.

                        A month later, this appears on the ticker page: http://www.jetphotos.net/viewphoto.php?id=6477553

                        Why?





                        Comment


                        • #72
                          Mark,

                          I can only assume that the sole screener ( it was Instant Added ) continued with their screening and forgot about the ticker addition when they finished their screening session.
                          To make a ticker entry we have to leave the screening page, find the new accepted picture ID number ( it's different to the queue ID number ) and create the ticker. I would imagine that after a possible long run of screening it was omitted.

                          I am confident that the crew will allow me to offer an apology on their behalf, we are but human !
                          If it 'ain't broken........ Don't try to mend it !

                          Comment


                          • #73
                            Hi Brian,

                            Thanks for posting a reponse.


                            I noticed a ticker entry about Sun Country's first 737-700. I guess no one remembers Sun Country received two 73G's in 2001:

                            http://www.airliners.net/photo/Sun-Country-Airlines/Boeing-737-7Q8/0213306/L/

                            Granted they are a rare shot as none entered revenue service, but these were technically the first. Just being a nit-pick.





                            Comment


                            • #74
                              The hijacked CANJET flight 918 in Montego Bay returned to home base today....Halifax. Before I upload it, hot photo or not? I think probably not, but I am not 100% certain so I throw the question out to everyone.

                              Comment


                              • #75
                                nope, not hot photo ... unless you show the actual hijacking
                                My photos on Flickr www.flickr.com/photos/geridominguez

                                Comment

                                Working...
                                X