Depends. Another P-51, rather not. A BF-110, P-47, P-40 or Wildcat or FW190. If there are no previous pics of the bird in the db, then it is worth a try.
Announcement
Collapse
No announcement yet.
Hot photo use reminder!!
Collapse
This is a sticky topic.
X
X
-
Hi,
I recently had a "hot" rejection (among other reasons) of a bizjet. The upload was under the "hot" category not because of a new reg for JP, but because it was a very recently built aircraft. It was built in Dec. 2007 and deliviered to its current (unkown) owner and registered by the end of June, less than 2 months ago. I thought that would qualify as hot being a new aircraft (but not a new model)? If not, what am I not getting (yes, I AM stupid!)
Thanx and I appologize to the screeners for me using the hot feature in the wrong way, I know it takes time off your work .. sorry!
regards
Comment
-
G'day All,
Just so I hopefully don't waste the screeners time in the fututre;
What about something like a new deployment of visiting millitary jets to your local airport?
For example, we had some Singaporean F-16s visit Williamtown last year. Would it be ok to submit the first images I get of something like that as hot photos (if it happens in the future, not for last years F-16 photos)?
Cheers and thanks for the help.
Motty.
Comment
-
Originally posted by MottyWhat about something like a new deployment of visiting millitary jets to your local airport?
For example, we had some Singaporean F-16s visit Williamtown last year. Would it be ok to submit the first images I get of something like that as hot photos
Cheers - Vishal
Comment
-
Hi everyone... it says that a photo is hot when is't about a new type of aircraft for an airliner.
So, If an airliner have a couple of A319-112 but it receives a third one type A319-115 and this one has some differences about the -112 type it would be a Hot photo?
I'm confused about this because someone says that an aircraft with brand new winglets it would be hot, so I think that in this case, the new A319 it'd be a hot photo... wouldn't be?
thanks a lot.
Gatto
Comment
-
Nope, an A319-115 after a -112 is not a hot photo. First aircraft with winglets in a fleet, for example the first B738 with winglets, has been accepted as hot in the past.
Comment
-
Comment
-
-
So I uploaded this as a hot photo Back in January: http://www.jetphotos.net/viewphoto.php?id=6465473
I asked if it could be added to the ticker page. It wasn't.
A month later, this appears on the ticker page: http://www.jetphotos.net/viewphoto.php?id=6477553
Why?
Comment
-
Mark,
I can only assume that the sole screener ( it was Instant Added ) continued with their screening and forgot about the ticker addition when they finished their screening session.
To make a ticker entry we have to leave the screening page, find the new accepted picture ID number ( it's different to the queue ID number ) and create the ticker. I would imagine that after a possible long run of screening it was omitted.
I am confident that the crew will allow me to offer an apology on their behalf, we are but human !If it 'ain't broken........ Don't try to mend it !
Comment
-
Hi Brian,
Thanks for posting a reponse.
I noticed a ticker entry about Sun Country's first 737-700. I guess no one remembers Sun Country received two 73G's in 2001:
http://www.airliners.net/photo/Sun-Country-Airlines/Boeing-737-7Q8/0213306/L/
Granted they are a rare shot as none entered revenue service, but these were technically the first. Just being a nit-pick.
Comment
-
nope, not hot photo ... unless you show the actual hijacking
Comment
Comment