About "bad angle".

[Olli Vainio]

ok, could someone of the screeners tell me that what bad angle really is?
ie. these were rejected because of bad angle and I really don't see how they could be from "bad angle"

http://www.jetphotos.net/viewreject.php?id=25484

http://www.jetphotos.net/viewreject.php?id=25482

[andyhunt]

Hiya,

Perhaps you should appeal...........think that you might be in luck!

Andrew

[Ilbap]

I thought this picture would be rejected due to bad quality or not being level. But it was rejected for bad angle, I guess they don't want pictures of rear ends!

http://www.jetphotos.net/viewreject.php?id=25661

[JeffinDEN]

That is one ugly photo. Bad angle indeed!

[Chris Kilroy]

I would suspect that the vast number of 'bad angle' rejections on aircraft shot from behind come from me, as I just don't think this angle produces a visually appealing photo.

Action/interesting shots are a different story, but for me, seeing a photo of an airliner sitting on the ground, showing its rear end, doesn't do anything for me, especially when the photographer has uploaded 4-5 different photos of the same aircraft at better angles in the same batch (that's for you, Olli! ).

[Olli Vainio]

especially when the photographer has uploaded 4-5 different photos of the same aircraft at better angles in the same batch (that's for you, Olli! ).

OK, no more rear end, I promise

[andyhunt]

Chris,

What?? You don't like a nice photo of a rear end

Andrew

[Chris Kilroy]

What?? You don't like a nice photo of a rear end

Not particularly when it's an airplane, no.

[SWA733Captain]

I like rear end shots

No men please

[Leftseat86]

Bad angle?

[SWA733Captain]

Take it off!