Announcement

Collapse
No announcement yet.

Once Again, What's Going On?

Collapse
This topic is closed.
X
X
 
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts

  • #16
    I can't comment on the A320 because I didn't screen that one, but I can comment on the Copa EMB-190. First of all I found the NO 200 sticker too small for a ticker, and when I found out that it had already been online on another website for almost a week, I desided not to give it a ticker.

    Soren
    Regards
    Soren Madsen

    Spotting guide to CPH www.cphaviation.dk

    Comment


    • #17
      for fuck sake...go to the airport and take some photos Tomas, this is boring already! Your not the first or last aviation enthusiast, your not the only person to submit photos to JP & your not the only person in this forum. It's not all about Tomas Cubero believe it or not! Are you only happy when having a whinge? if it's not about the screening que it's about the disregard for your photos and their status on the front page banner.

      i might get slapped for this... grow up!


      next trips
      USA/DXB August.

      Comment


      • #18
        You all seriously need to get your panties untied. Take photos because you enjoy it, not to get a link in a ticker window link. And if you don't enjoy taking photos but just do it to feel important on a website, perhaps you have the wrong hobby. And no a Copa EMB-190 with a 200th emb sticker barely visble near the door doesn't deserve a ticker. It's not a new or radically different special scheme. Hell, some of the US Airways 733/734 missing half the paint are more "eye catching" than that.

        Whats wrong with just going out with your buddies and having fun taking pictures of airplanes instead of fighting with each other over bs. Grow up and stop acting like a 12 year old girl.

        Comment


        • #19
          I agree, it has gotten out of hand, my original post was justified and I shut up after the third reply, but now its gotten out of hand so I have requested this post to be locked.

          Thank you,
          Tomas.

          Comment


          • #20
            Originally posted by tomas_cubero
            I agree, it has gotten out of hand, my original post was justified and I shut up after the third reply, but now its gotten out of hand so I have requested this post to be locked.

            Thank you,
            Tomas.
            Your original post wasn't very justified.


            Comment


            • #21
              Originally posted by E-Diddy!
              Your original post wasn't very justified.
              I am referring that Montague and Gerardo replied and justified my question and I was going to shut up already.

              Comment


              • #22
                we never justified your question, infact, we were unjustifiying it and the manner in which you raised it by highlighting another persons photograph. If you have an issue with regards to your shot not being given a banner then email the screeners, admin and seek clarification, but don't come on here carrying on like you're hard done by and using other photographers work to illustrate some kind of bias which doesn't exist.

                finished now?


                next trips
                USA/DXB August.

                Comment


                • #23
                  I think we've come to an end here.

                  Locked

                  Comment

                  Working...
                  X