Announcement

Collapse
No announcement yet.

Rejected here, acepted there

Collapse
X
 
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts

  • Rejected here, acepted there

    I find it funny that this photo was rejected on jp.net, but acepted on a.net!!

    http://www.jetphotos.net/viewreject_b.php?id=1354424
    http://www.airliners.net/open.file/1190722/L/

    If it was really overexposed, it should of been rejected on a.net to.

  • #2
    Originally posted by Calfo
    I find it funny that this photo was rejected on jp.net, but acepted on a.net!!

    We have standards over here

    Actually, looking at the photo, the white on the upper surfaces of the Cherokee fuselage looks off, especially over the window in the door and the fuselage section over the wingtip. Looks like either the paint is really shabby, or you hit it with the burn tool to get rid of an overexposed area. The vertical stabilizer of the background aircraft looks blown out to me also.
    KC-135: Passing gas and taking names!

    Comment


    • #3
      Originally posted by Calfo
      I find it funny that this photo was rejected on jp.net, but acepted on a.net!!

      http://www.jetphotos.net/viewreject_b.php?id=1354424
      http://www.airliners.net/open.file/1190722/L/

      If it was really overexposed, it should of been rejected on a.net to.
      Jetphotos and Airlines are two completely different sites! Just because it got on Airliners doesn't mean it'll get on JetPhotos!

      Plus you already have 2 pictures of the aircraft on JetPhotos...

      Comment


      • #4
        I'd say that if the aircraft is truly that clean, then I'd say it's exposed perfectly.
        Tanner Johnson - Owner
        twenty53 Photography

        Comment


        • #5
          One penny for every rejected shot on A.net .....
          My photos on Flickr www.flickr.com/photos/geridominguez

          Comment


          • #6
            also appears soft on my screen.


            next trips
            USA/DXB August.

            Comment


            • #7
              Originally posted by LX-A343
              One penny for every rejected shot on A.net .....
              I'd be poor as hell cause i gave up on those guys a long time ago...

              Comment


              • #8
                I think you were very lucky it got on Anet

                Comment


                • #9
                  Originally posted by FatGit
                  I think you were very lucky it got on Anet
                  Have to agree with that sentiment....and I speak as an expert Anet rejectee !!
                  If it 'ain't broken........ Don't try to mend it !

                  Comment


                  • #10
                    Nothing special here. happened to me quiet a few time and all I can say is that they were probably rightfully rejected on jp and that I got lucky it got accepted there...

                    And I also think you were lucky to get it accepted.

                    Regards

                    Comment


                    • #11
                      Quite common for me also. In fact one of my top 5 shots on a.net is a jp.net rejection.

                      Comment


                      • #12
                        Screening is a subjective art. Far too many variables to be perfect so your man at A.net may have liked the shot and accepted it while the guy here likes heavy metal and didn't.

                        However, YOU are the main judge of your pictures, not some anonymous screener here or at A.net and you have to decide what's good or not. And it's your collection that matters, not the net.

                        Personally, I think all screeners should be neutered at birth and kept in a darkened room and fed on cat food, but thats just a personal opinion!!

                        Have a nice day y'all

                        Andy

                        Comment

                        Working...
                        X