Announcement
Collapse
No announcement yet.
Rejected here, acepted there
Collapse
X
-
Originally posted by CalfoI find it funny that this photo was rejected on jp.net, but acepted on a.net!!
We have standards over here
Actually, looking at the photo, the white on the upper surfaces of the Cherokee fuselage looks off, especially over the window in the door and the fuselage section over the wingtip. Looks like either the paint is really shabby, or you hit it with the burn tool to get rid of an overexposed area. The vertical stabilizer of the background aircraft looks blown out to me also.KC-135: Passing gas and taking names!
-
Originally posted by CalfoI find it funny that this photo was rejected on jp.net, but acepted on a.net!!
http://www.jetphotos.net/viewreject_b.php?id=1354424
http://www.airliners.net/open.file/1190722/L/
If it was really overexposed, it should of been rejected on a.net to.
Plus you already have 2 pictures of the aircraft on JetPhotos...
Comment
-
I'd say that if the aircraft is truly that clean, then I'd say it's exposed perfectly.Tanner Johnson - Owner
twenty53 Photography
Comment
-
One penny for every rejected shot on A.net .....
Comment
-
Screening is a subjective art. Far too many variables to be perfect so your man at A.net may have liked the shot and accepted it while the guy here likes heavy metal and didn't.
However, YOU are the main judge of your pictures, not some anonymous screener here or at A.net and you have to decide what's good or not. And it's your collection that matters, not the net.
Personally, I think all screeners should be neutered at birth and kept in a darkened room and fed on cat food, but thats just a personal opinion!!
Have a nice day y'all
Andy
Comment
Comment