Interesting panning blur...?

[seahawk]

[photoid=344180]

You should not compare airliners to jets. 1/500th.

[DamienB]

But I am concerned that the whole thing was made public. This is something that the screeners, the photographer and the person bringing the concerns should discuss in private. It is not something to be splashed around the forums in my view.

It was already public on another forum.

The photographer hasn't responded to the email.

Perhaps the screeners should discuss it with them in private therefore. I will say no more.

[Eadster]

I am just curious if PS is capable of adding motion blur? I know PS is extremely powerful.

Of course! And if done properly, can be very effective.

I've not got a response and not holding out any hope on one really.

Stefan - true mate, I agree there, but a hell of a lot more blurr in the subject photo!

[stef747]

Stefan - true mate, I agree there, but a hell of a lot more blurr in the subject photo!

You're dead right there Eadster, the 747 shot was way blurrier, just thought I should add some facts to this thread rather than another accusation!