Ok if anyone else has noticed please discuss.
The main photo of the 787 arriving in Farnborough is just awful,i said it
How can a big website like flightglobal put that rubbish on its front page,I know everyone isnt an "expert" photographer,but time & time again i see the worst "press shots" posted on flightglobal,provided usually by boeing or airbus.
Im not sure if its intentional to give unlevel,badly composed,badly exposed shots to the press,or is it the websites own fault for running with them?
What are the jp photographers opinions?
The main photo of the 787 arriving in Farnborough is just awful,i said it
How can a big website like flightglobal put that rubbish on its front page,I know everyone isnt an "expert" photographer,but time & time again i see the worst "press shots" posted on flightglobal,provided usually by boeing or airbus.
Im not sure if its intentional to give unlevel,badly composed,badly exposed shots to the press,or is it the websites own fault for running with them?
What are the jp photographers opinions?
Comment