QUALITY Rejections

[bsu3]

Hello, come to my rescue !!!
I have rejections of my photos. I want to display the new plane APG AIRLINES JetPhotos and Fr24 but my photos are rejected for bad qualities or Cropping / Photo edges / Size Ratio / JPG compression artefacts.
I can not resize them without losing quality.
I ask you for help because I am French and I speak very little English. So I can not search the forum to find my answers.
Thank you
Stéphane

[LX-A343]

Hello, come to my rescue !!!
I have rejections of my photos. I want to display the new plane APG AIRLINES JetPhotos and Fr24 but my photos are rejected for bad qualities or Cropping / Photo edges / Size Ratio / JPG compression artefacts.
I can not resize them without losing quality.
I ask you for help because I am French and I speak very little English. So I can not search the forum to find my answers.
Thank you
Stéphane

These photos have no chance at all of being accepted, as they lack basic photography basics (both are backlit, bad framed) and qualities (JPG compression, cropping, ...).

You need to start with other photos.

It would also be good to learn to understand basics of taking photos and editing photos. For example: resizing photos does NOT mean losing quality.

[pcarvalho]

These photos have no chance at all of being accepted, as they lack basic photography basics (both are backlit, bad framed) and qualities (JPG compression, cropping, ...).

You need to start with other photos.

It would also be good to learn to understand basics of taking photos and editing photos. For example: resizing photos does NOT mean losing quality.

unfortunately reject quality photos and accept photos of poor quality.

the first is reject

https://www.jetphotos.com/viewqueued_b.php?id=6661314

and the second accept

https://www.jetphotos.com/photo/

just compare

[brianw999]

unfortunately reject quality photos and accept photos of poor quality.

the first is reject

https://www.jetphotos.com/viewqueued_b.php?id=6661314

and the second accept

https://www.jetphotos.com/photo/9005387

just compare

Firstly, it is considered extremely rude to compare your correctly rejected image to someone else’s correctly accepted image. The histogram on your image has a flat line on the right hand side which indicates the underexposure. This histogram can be adjusted.

[dlowwa]

unfortunately reject quality photos and accept photos of poor quality.

the first is reject

https://www.jetphotos.com/viewqueued_b.php?id=6661314

and the second accept

https://www.jetphotos.com/photo/

just compare

There are thousands of images we could compare and argue which is better/worse, darker/brighter, sharper/softer, but we won't. Please keep the discussion to your own image(s).

[pcarvalho]

Firstly, it is considered extremely rude to compare your correctly rejected image to someone else’s correctly accepted image. The histogram on your image has a flat line on the right hand side which indicates the underexposure. This histogram can be adjusted.

negative, It is what I think.

[pcarvalho]

There are thousands of images we could compare and argue which is better/worse, darker/brighter, sharper/softer, but we won't. Please keep the discussion to your own image(s).

I always have to compare with other images

[brianw999]

I always have to compare with other images

Then compare YOUR rejections to YOUR accepted images. Do not compare to someone else’s accepted work. Your image is clearly underexposed, the histogram clearly confirms it. The histogram can be adjusted to fix the problem which is the route that you need to take. If you continue to compare to the work of others you will find that you will be ignored.

[pcarvalho]

Then compare YOUR rejections to YOUR accepted images. Do not compare to someone else’s accepted work. Your image is clearly underexposed, the histogram clearly confirms it. The histogram can be adjusted to fix the problem which is the route that you need to take. If you continue to compare to the work of others you will find that you will be ignored.

I'm talking about quality and not histogram. Or have or do not have quality, end.
I send photos to the jetphotos almost 16 years, I do not need to compare myself to anyone.

regards

[StefBrat]

Just my 2cent as a normal user:
I don't understand why you complain? If you have so many experience as you said then you should see clearly that the linked photo is underexposed. So why do you compare with others instead of simply fixing and reuploading. What are your minds behind that post...I'm not getting the point.

Of course there are sometimes small differences that can come from different screens (user and screener) and also different workflows. But I saw your linked photo before it was removed and to be honest I could not see why it's worser then yours? For me your linked photo was in quality better then yours.