Most Recent Photo not showing on Flightradar24

[Alex - Spot-This !]

That's because it's the first and only pic of that reg. Better to show something than nothing....

[OmarZ19]

Your photo is a close-up so it won't be on FR24

Regards
Alex

This ATR is also close-up and that photo appears on Flightradar, not understanding why some photos do and others do not show it

https://www.jetphotos.com/photo/10003382

And so for that style of close-up photo there are many that are shown...
Thanks !

[Alex - Spot-This !]

Hello greetings to all.
My most recent photo A319 N690AV of Avianca on jetphotos database not showing on Flightradar24.
Please check, thank you very much.

https://www.jetphotos.com/photo/10006489

Your photo is a close-up so it won't be on FR24

Regards
Alex

[Alex - Spot-This !]

Hello greetings to all.
My most recent photo PA-28 HK-2399-G on jetphotos database not showing on Flightradar24.
Please check, thank you very much.

https://www.jetphotos.com/photo/9453969

And it will not be shown on FR24 as your photo is from an angle that doesn't offer any view of the paint scheme of that Piper.

Regards
Alex

[OmarZ19]

Hello greetings to all.
My most recent photo PA-28 HK-2399-G on jetphotos database not showing on Flightradar24.
Please check, thank you very much.

https://www.jetphotos.com/photo/9453969

[OmarZ19]

Hello greetings to all.
My most recent photo A319 N690AV of Avianca on jetphotos database not showing on Flightradar24.
Please check, thank you very much.

https://www.jetphotos.com/photo/10006489

[QuocTrungTran]

I'm guessing mine isn't being shown on F24 because its a tail shot, however could someone take a look at it for me. It's been on the database for 2 days now and isn't on F24.

https://www.jetphotos.com/photo/9484892

Hi,

Please see:

This constant argument could be stopped if the people who want their images used by FR24 would just accept that they need to upload basically side on shots that show the whole fuselage and it’s colour scheme.

And the examples that follow, you'll understand why.

[InfinitelyFlying]

I'm guessing mine isn't being shown on F24 because its a tail shot, however could someone take a look at it for me. It's been on the database for 2 days now and isn't on F24.

https://www.jetphotos.com/photo/9484892

[777MAN]

That pretty much sums it up.

JetPhotos.com and Flightradar24.com are two separate websites that are owned by the same people. JetPhotos is an image database and FR24 is a flight tracking service. It just so happens that FR24 sources some images from JP and require essentially a side on view to best illustrate the aircraft being tracked.

Hi Brian, interesting juxtaposition.

As I see things as a volunteer screener and uploader. In the first instance when I started uploading I did so because I enjoyed it and found it challenging, helping me with my technique/ development (your advice in the threads still stands as good practice - imo) informative and most of all enjoyable.

As to FR24 - yes there is inconsistency in screening, I’m sure the admins are aware.

I know FR24 want/desire certain images , again that’s something admin are aware of.

Regards T

[brianw999]

IMHO

OK for fr24: https://www.jetphotos.com/photo/9241223

This will be excluded: https://www.jetphotos.com/photo/9240081

That pretty much sums it up.

JetPhotos.com and Flightradar24.com are two separate websites that are owned by the same people. JetPhotos is an image database and FR24 is a flight tracking service. It just so happens that FR24 sources some images from JP and require essentially a side on view to best illustrate the aircraft being tracked.

[Rimerob767]

Without seeing examples, I can't really say.

What about this photo then? https://www.jetphotos.com/photo/9287575-

RR

[QuocTrungTran]

So my next shots needs to show the whole livery, then it is good?

IMHO

OK for fr24: https://www.jetphotos.com/photo/9241223

This will be excluded: https://www.jetphotos.com/photo/9240081

[brianw999]

This constant argument could be stopped if the people who want their images used by FR24 would just accept that they need to upload basically side on shots that show the whole fuselage and it’s colour scheme.

[dlowwa]

So my next shots needs to show the whole livery, then it is good?

Without seeing examples, I can't really say.

[Rimerob767]

The latter should have been excluded (and will be); the others show the livery well enough.

So my next shots needs to show the whole livery, then it is good?