Announcement

Collapse
No announcement yet.

Most Recent Photo not showing on Flightradar24

Collapse
X
 
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts

  • Alex - Spot-This !
    replied
    That's because it's the first and only pic of that reg. Better to show something than nothing....

    Leave a comment:


  • OmarZ19
    replied
    Originally posted by Alex - Spot-This ! View Post

    Your photo is a close-up so it won't be on FR24

    Regards
    Alex
    This ATR is also close-up and that photo appears on Flightradar, not understanding why some photos do and others do not show it

    https://www.jetphotos.com/photo/10003382

    And so for that style of close-up photo there are many that are shown...
    Thanks !

    Leave a comment:


  • Alex - Spot-This !
    replied
    Originally posted by OmarZ19 View Post
    Hello greetings to all.
    My most recent photo A319 N690AV of Avianca on jetphotos database not showing on Flightradar24.
    Please check, thank you very much.

    https://www.jetphotos.com/photo/10006489
    Your photo is a close-up so it won't be on FR24

    Regards
    Alex

    Leave a comment:


  • Alex - Spot-This !
    replied
    Originally posted by OmarZ19 View Post
    Hello greetings to all.
    My most recent photo PA-28 HK-2399-G on jetphotos database not showing on Flightradar24.
    Please check, thank you very much.

    https://www.jetphotos.com/photo/9453969
    And it will not be shown on FR24 as your photo is from an angle that doesn't offer any view of the paint scheme of that Piper.

    Regards
    Alex

    Leave a comment:


  • OmarZ19
    replied
    Hello greetings to all.
    My most recent photo PA-28 HK-2399-G on jetphotos database not showing on Flightradar24.
    Please check, thank you very much.

    https://www.jetphotos.com/photo/9453969

    Leave a comment:


  • OmarZ19
    replied
    Hello greetings to all.
    My most recent photo A319 N690AV of Avianca on jetphotos database not showing on Flightradar24.
    Please check, thank you very much.

    https://www.jetphotos.com/photo/10006489

    Leave a comment:


  • QuocTrungTran
    replied
    Originally posted by InfinitelyFlying View Post
    I'm guessing mine isn't being shown on F24 because its a tail shot, however could someone take a look at it for me. It's been on the database for 2 days now and isn't on F24.

    https://www.jetphotos.com/photo/9484892
    Hi,

    Please see:

    Originally posted by brianw999 View Post
    This constant argument could be stopped if the people who want their images used by FR24 would just accept that they need to upload basically side on shots that show the whole fuselage and it’s colour scheme.
    And the examples that follow, you'll understand why.

    Leave a comment:


  • InfinitelyFlying
    replied
    I'm guessing mine isn't being shown on F24 because its a tail shot, however could someone take a look at it for me. It's been on the database for 2 days now and isn't on F24.

    https://www.jetphotos.com/photo/9484892

    Leave a comment:


  • 777MAN
    replied
    Originally posted by brianw999 View Post
    That pretty much sums it up.

    JetPhotos.com and Flightradar24.com are two separate websites that are owned by the same people. JetPhotos is an image database and FR24 is a flight tracking service. It just so happens that FR24 sources some images from JP and require essentially a side on view to best illustrate the aircraft being tracked.
    Hi Brian, interesting juxtaposition.

    As I see things as a volunteer screener and uploader. In the first instance when I started uploading I did so because I enjoyed it and found it challenging, helping me with my technique/ development (your advice in the threads still stands as good practice - imo) informative and most of all enjoyable.

    As to FR24 - yes there is inconsistency in screening, I’m sure the admins are aware.

    I know FR24 want/desire certain images , again that’s something admin are aware of.

    Regards T
    Last edited by 777MAN; 2019-04-23, 18:47.

    Leave a comment:


  • brianw999
    replied
    Originally posted by QuocTrungTran View Post
    That pretty much sums it up.

    JetPhotos.com and Flightradar24.com are two separate websites that are owned by the same people. JetPhotos is an image database and FR24 is a flight tracking service. It just so happens that FR24 sources some images from JP and require essentially a side on view to best illustrate the aircraft being tracked.
    Last edited by brianw999; 2019-04-23, 15:30.

    Leave a comment:


  • Rimerob767
    replied
    Originally posted by dlowwa View Post
    Without seeing examples, I can't really say.
    What about this photo then? https://www.jetphotos.com/photo/9287575-

    RR

    Leave a comment:


  • QuocTrungTran
    replied
    Originally posted by Rimerob767 View Post
    So my next shots needs to show the whole livery, then it is good?
    IMHO

    OK for fr24: https://www.jetphotos.com/photo/9241223

    This will be excluded: https://www.jetphotos.com/photo/9240081

    Leave a comment:


  • brianw999
    replied
    This constant argument could be stopped if the people who want their images used by FR24 would just accept that they need to upload basically side on shots that show the whole fuselage and it’s colour scheme.

    Leave a comment:


  • dlowwa
    replied
    Originally posted by Rimerob767 View Post
    So my next shots needs to show the whole livery, then it is good?
    Without seeing examples, I can't really say.

    Leave a comment:


  • Rimerob767
    replied
    Originally posted by dlowwa View Post
    The latter should have been excluded (and will be); the others show the livery well enough.
    So my next shots needs to show the whole livery, then it is good?

    Leave a comment:

Working...
X