Dear Team,
First of all, I am sorry if there is already a topic for this question. This is just to be sure of my thoughts and I do NOT intend to upload the following example.
Today I had the privilege of being up close and personal with this gem. In this particular spot where I took some shots, the aircraft was just too big to fit in the whole frame, even at 24mm on a full frame body. As I don't have a "fish-eye" lens, I took a sequence of 20 RAW shots in order to create a panorama on Lightroom.
The digital processing was almost perfect and I just noted a small issue in the assembly which I think it's visible in the attachments (just behind the left engine).
Therefore, it will remain only for my personal collection or, in the limit, to publish in one of my social media accounts.
My question is: if the assembly was just perfect, would it be suitable to upload to JetPhotos? I read (again) the Upload Guidelines and I think below statement applies to this case:
Anyway, I just wanted some of you to confirm that this is anyway a case of digital manipulation and, therefore, not acceptable at all, even if the final result is good and makes us remember the famous "fish-eye" effect.
Your time and feedback is highly appreciated in advance.
Kind regards from OPO,
Carlos Miguel Seabra
#50694
First of all, I am sorry if there is already a topic for this question. This is just to be sure of my thoughts and I do NOT intend to upload the following example.
Today I had the privilege of being up close and personal with this gem. In this particular spot where I took some shots, the aircraft was just too big to fit in the whole frame, even at 24mm on a full frame body. As I don't have a "fish-eye" lens, I took a sequence of 20 RAW shots in order to create a panorama on Lightroom.
The digital processing was almost perfect and I just noted a small issue in the assembly which I think it's visible in the attachments (just behind the left engine).
Therefore, it will remain only for my personal collection or, in the limit, to publish in one of my social media accounts.
My question is: if the assembly was just perfect, would it be suitable to upload to JetPhotos? I read (again) the Upload Guidelines and I think below statement applies to this case:
1.1.1 Upload only unaltered images
Cloning anything in or out of a photo will mean that the photo will be rejected and you are running the risk of your upload privileges being withdrawn or limited for some time. Manipulating a photo is something we will never tolerate. We reserve ourselves the right to remove manipulated photos from the database. All that we allow to be cloned out are artefacts in the picture that look like sensor dust spots.
Any manipulation of a photo will not be tolerated and might result in a ban if repeated.
Cloning anything in or out of a photo will mean that the photo will be rejected and you are running the risk of your upload privileges being withdrawn or limited for some time. Manipulating a photo is something we will never tolerate. We reserve ourselves the right to remove manipulated photos from the database. All that we allow to be cloned out are artefacts in the picture that look like sensor dust spots.
Any manipulation of a photo will not be tolerated and might result in a ban if repeated.
Anyway, I just wanted some of you to confirm that this is anyway a case of digital manipulation and, therefore, not acceptable at all, even if the final result is good and makes us remember the famous "fish-eye" effect.
Your time and feedback is highly appreciated in advance.
Kind regards from OPO,
Carlos Miguel Seabra
#50694
Comment