If this is your first visit, be sure to
check out the FAQ by clicking the
link above. You may have to register
before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages,
select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below.
good, now everyone can right click, save, and print those pictures without having to ask for permission..
why? how will the size make a difference?
"The Director also sets the record straight on what would happen if oxygen masks were to drop from the ceiling: The passengers freak out with abandon, instead of continuing to chat amiably, as though lunch were being served, like they do on those in-flight safety videos."
good, now everyone can right click, save, and print those pictures without having to ask for permission..
If you don't want to upload your photos at 1600, there's nothing stating you have to.
Some people wanted that ability, and the sole purpose behind this change was to give it to them. If you don't like it, don't do it.
Personally, if someone wants to print out one of my photos and hang it in their own home, that's fine by me. No different than making it their background in my eyes.
It's quite a bit of a dilemma in my opinion. I know that some people have their monitor resolutions at 1600px & they'll definitely benefit from this new rule. However, I reckon most monitors are still set to 1024px. Those guys will have to scroll around or resize the file to enjoy it.
I actually went the opposite way & started to upload my photos at 970px so that the edges aren't cut off by the browser window. I wonder though what my photos look like on 1600x1200 screens.
It's beyond me why anyone would run their monitor at or below 1024pixels. I run in 1152, that way a 1024 image fits nicely within the screen. I like some photos that are 1600 (if of course, they are of quality) because of the level of detail you get.
I seriously doubt it makes much difference piracy wise. If someone wants to steal your photo, they will, I doubt 600 extra pixels will make much of a difference.
I seriously doubt it makes much difference piracy wise. If someone wants to steal your photo, they will, I doubt 600 extra pixels will make much of a difference.
Oh yes it does!
Ok, try printing out a picture that is 424 pixels wide (minus 600 pixels)
It's pretty crap, eh?
Remember: 300dpi industry standard.
1600 px wide? ...you're not far away from 1800px which = 6 inches of high quality.... if you pardon the expression....
That's why I'm not going above 1024px at this time
We process personal data about users of our site, through the use of cookies and other technologies, to deliver our services, personalize advertising, and to analyze site activity. We may share certain information about our users with our advertising and analytics partners. For additional details, refer to our Privacy Policy.
By clicking "I AGREE" below, you agree to our Privacy Policy and our personal data processing and cookie practices as described therein. You also acknowledge that this forum may be hosted outside your country and you consent to the collection, storage, and processing of your data in the country where this forum is hosted.
Tweet
Comment