Announcement

Collapse
No announcement yet.

Rejections ChicagoAvGeek

Collapse
X
 
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts

  • Rejections ChicagoAvGeek

    Hi all,

    I have recently had a few photos rejected and I am far below my normal acceptance rate on this round. 1 of them was previously rejected with a helpful comment "a great shot, but fix these things and I look forward to accepting next time" I have attached the image. It is of the 757. Now after resubmitting, I am getting a bad color rejection which was not previously on there. On another photo from the same day, I am also getting a bad color rejection. Prior to these, I was nearly 100% for pictures from the same day. Can someone shed some more light on "bad color"? I've been using Adobe RGB for years and haven't had an issue, but I will go to sRGB.

    Thanks.


    https://www.jetphotos.com/viewreject_b.php?id=7704145

    https://www.jetphotos.com/viewreject_b.php?id=7704149

  • #2
    You are correct, sRGB is preferred to Adobe RGB (or any other color space), so please use that going forward.

    Comment


    • #3
      Originally posted by dlowwa View Post
      You are correct, sRGB is preferred to Adobe RGB (or any other color space), so please use that going forward.

      thank you. Can you tell me why the color on these was rejected? Is it saturation or just the color space?

      Comment


      • #4
        Originally posted by ChicagoAvgeek View Post


        thank you. Can you tell me why the color on these was rejected? Is it saturation or just the color space?
        Wrong color space. Images won't typically be rejected for that alone unless there are other issues present (as with your images), so consider it more as a reminder to use the correct space in the future than as an indication that something is severely wrong with the color.

        Comment


        • #5
          SRGB is used on computers while Adobe RGB is more for physical prints.

          Comment


          • #6
            Hello crew,

            Back again with another question. I got a similar rejection for these photos. The only similarity is that they are on the same side, but have different backgrounds and different phases of flight. Can someone please clarify?

            https://www.jetphotos.com/viewqueued_b.php?id=7709003

            https://www.jetphotos.com/photo/9463888

            Comment


            • #7
              You have this one in the database as well: https://www.jetphotos.com/photo/8251925
              Looks pretty similar to me

              Comment


              • #8
                Originally posted by pdeboer View Post
                You have this one in the database as well: https://www.jetphotos.com/photo/8251925
                Looks pretty similar to me
                I guess I didn't realize taking the pictures at other airports counted.

                Comment


                • #9
                  Originally posted by ChicagoAvgeek View Post

                  I guess I didn't realize taking the pictures at other airports counted.
                  With no visual cues in the background other than (blue) sky, a different location generally isn't considered when judging similars.

                  Comment


                  • #10
                    Originally posted by dlowwa View Post

                    With no visual cues in the background other than (blue) sky, a different location generally isn't considered when judging similars.
                    Thank you. Perhaps these photos should also show up in the box that says "you have x photos of this aircraft". Just a suggestion.

                    Comment


                    • #11
                      Originally posted by ChicagoAvgeek View Post

                      Thank you. Perhaps these photos should also show up in the box that says "you have x photos of this aircraft". Just a suggestion.
                      Honestly, is not something that occurs frequently enough to be worth the effort to do. Cases like you I see maybe once every few months, so not that common.

                      Comment

                      Working...
                      X