Tejas,K - Prescreen advice

[Tejas Khambhayta]

Good evening, would the following image be accepted? I'm slightly sceptical about the contrast as it mixes in with the clouds near the top on the front portion of the aircraft. Also, if its uploadable, would it be accepted bearing in mind that i already have a picture of the same reg, but on a different day and angle? I appreciate the help, thank you

[dlowwa]

Hello,

I got 2 images rejected for being dark/underexposed (https://www.jetphotos.com/viewqueued_b.php?id=7951960) Do you reckon it can be revived/uploaded to the database? The photo was taken when the clouds were covering the sun hence the dark look.

As this was also rejected (https://www.jetphotos.com/viewqueued_b.php?id=7952177) for being soft, is this any better, fix the issue? Thank you for your help

Very poor light on the first, so don't think it is fixable. Second should be workable with a better edit.

[Tejas Khambhayta]

Hello,

I got 2 images rejected for being dark/underexposed (https://www.jetphotos.com/viewqueued_b.php?id=7951960) Do you reckon it can be revived/uploaded to the database? The photo was taken when the clouds were covering the sun hence the dark look.

As this was also rejected (https://www.jetphotos.com/viewqueued_b.php?id=7952177) for being soft, is this any better, fix the issue? Thank you for your help

[Tejas Khambhayta]

There appears to be some softness/blur towards the tail on a couple of them, but overall sharpening should be ok. Contrast is a bit harsh on all of them as well.

Thank you for the help. I agree that the contrast is harsh, I guess it's because of the camera settings I used on that day; the raw image has the same looks. Thanks once again, Tejas

[dlowwa]

Hello, I was wondering if the following images would be accepted.

My main concern is an Over-Sharpen/Soft rejection for these images. Could I receive some feedback please? Thanks a lot, Tejas

There appears to be some softness/blur towards the tail on a couple of them, but overall sharpening should be ok. Contrast is a bit harsh on all of them as well.

[Tejas Khambhayta]

Hello, I was wondering if the following images would be accepted.

My main concern is an Over-Sharpen/Soft rejection for these images. Could I receive some feedback please? Thanks a lot, Tejas

[dlowwa]

Is it by chance over exposed? From your last post, I've been checking the histogram for each photo. All the other photos, including this Turkish Airlines aircraft, showed a value exceeding the graph. I've googled how to use a histogram and I'm still getting my head around using them, but I'm still unsure about these irregular values.

Many thanks, Tejas

Contrast is a bit harsh, but I don't see it as being overexposed.

[Tejas Khambhayta]

A bit high in the frame, but otherwise ok.

Is it by chance over exposed? From your last post, I've been checking the histogram for each photo. All the other photos, including this Turkish Airlines aircraft, showed a value exceeding the graph. I've googled how to use a histogram and I'm still getting my head around using them, but I'm still unsure about these irregular values.

Many thanks, Tejas

[dlowwa]

Hi, thanks you for the last response. I edited another image, could it please be pre-screened? Thanks a lot, Tejas

Borderline oversharpened/overprocessed.

[Tejas Khambhayta]

Hi, thanks you for the last response. I edited another image, could it please be pre-screened? Thanks a lot, Tejas

[dlowwa]

Hello, hope you're having a good day.

Recently, I got a rejection (https://www.jetphotos.com/viewqueued_b.php?id=7920738) where the photo I uploaded was overexposed, under sharpened and had some info missing. I'm unable to understand why it was rejected for over exposure. Is it because the "member of" part of the livery looks blown out? I have no idea! In my opinion, and i may be wrong because of my insufficient knowledge in photography, but i don't see how this was rejected for that reason. Also, my bad that missed out some information during the process of uploading the photo, could you please tell me what section I didn't fill out. I double checked but I didn't notice anything unfilled, also is the serial section always blank or did I honestly forget to write it in?

Thank you very much for your help so I can upload photos in the future without repeating similar mistakes, Tejas

If you check the histogram, you can see some small peaks on the right edge indicating that yes, some small parts of the image (likely the tail) are blown out. There is no info missing, you should check the rejection reasons again, it was rejected for missing categories, in this case Special Scheme should have applied.

[Tejas Khambhayta]

Hello, hope you're having a good day.

Recently, I got a rejection (https://www.jetphotos.com/viewqueued_b.php?id=7920738) where the photo I uploaded was overexposed, under sharpened and had some info missing. I'm unable to understand why it was rejected for over exposure. Is it because the "member of" part of the livery looks blown out? I have no idea! In my opinion, and i may be wrong because of my insufficient knowledge in photography, but i don't see how this was rejected for that reason. Also, my bad that missed out some information during the process of uploading the photo, could you please tell me what section I didn't fill out. I double checked but I didn't notice anything unfilled, also is the serial section always blank or did I honestly forget to write it in?

Thank you very much for your help so I can upload photos in the future without repeating similar mistakes, Tejas

[LX-A343]

Whereabouts are these jagged lines on the aircraft? I'm struggling to find them. Thank you

For example upper edge of the engine, or along the wing.

[Tejas Khambhayta]

some fine jagged lines, but should be OK.

Whereabouts are these jagged lines on the aircraft? I'm struggling to find them. Thank you

[LX-A343]

Thank you for the last response. I just edited another image, which had previously been rejected, and could you please check it out. Thanks

some fine jagged lines, but should be OK.