If this is your first visit, be sure to
check out the FAQ by clicking the
link above. You may have to register
before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages,
select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below.
I got 2 images rejected for being dark/underexposed (https://www.jetphotos.com/viewqueued_b.php?id=7951960) Do you reckon it can be revived/uploaded to the database? The photo was taken when the clouds were covering the sun hence the dark look.
There appears to be some softness/blur towards the tail on a couple of them, but overall sharpening should be ok. Contrast is a bit harsh on all of them as well.
Thank you for the help. I agree that the contrast is harsh, I guess it's because of the camera settings I used on that day; the raw image has the same looks. Thanks once again, Tejas
Hello, I was wondering if the following images would be accepted.
My main concern is an Over-Sharpen/Soft rejection for these images. Could I receive some feedback please? Thanks a lot, Tejas
There appears to be some softness/blur towards the tail on a couple of them, but overall sharpening should be ok. Contrast is a bit harsh on all of them as well.
Is it by chance over exposed? From your last post, I've been checking the histogram for each photo. All the other photos, including this Turkish Airlines aircraft, showed a value exceeding the graph. I've googled how to use a histogram and I'm still getting my head around using them, but I'm still unsure about these irregular values.
Many thanks, Tejas
Contrast is a bit harsh, but I don't see it as being overexposed.
Is it by chance over exposed? From your last post, I've been checking the histogram for each photo. All the other photos, including this Turkish Airlines aircraft, showed a value exceeding the graph. I've googled how to use a histogram and I'm still getting my head around using them, but I'm still unsure about these irregular values.
Recently, I got a rejection (https://www.jetphotos.com/viewqueued_b.php?id=7920738) where the photo I uploaded was overexposed, under sharpened and had some info missing. I'm unable to understand why it was rejected for over exposure. Is it because the "member of" part of the livery looks blown out? I have no idea! In my opinion, and i may be wrong because of my insufficient knowledge in photography, but i don't see how this was rejected for that reason. Also, my bad that missed out some information during the process of uploading the photo, could you please tell me what section I didn't fill out. I double checked but I didn't notice anything unfilled, also is the serial section always blank or did I honestly forget to write it in?
Thank you very much for your help so I can upload photos in the future without repeating similar mistakes, Tejas
If you check the histogram, you can see some small peaks on the right edge indicating that yes, some small parts of the image (likely the tail) are blown out. There is no info missing, you should check the rejection reasons again, it was rejected for missing categories, in this case Special Scheme should have applied.
Recently, I got a rejection (https://www.jetphotos.com/viewqueued_b.php?id=7920738) where the photo I uploaded was overexposed, under sharpened and had some info missing. I'm unable to understand why it was rejected for over exposure. Is it because the "member of" part of the livery looks blown out? I have no idea! In my opinion, and i may be wrong because of my insufficient knowledge in photography, but i don't see how this was rejected for that reason. Also, my bad that missed out some information during the process of uploading the photo, could you please tell me what section I didn't fill out. I double checked but I didn't notice anything unfilled, also is the serial section always blank or did I honestly forget to write it in?
Thank you very much for your help so I can upload photos in the future without repeating similar mistakes, Tejas
We process personal data about users of our site, through the use of cookies and other technologies, to deliver our services, personalize advertising, and to analyze site activity. We may share certain information about our users with our advertising and analytics partners. For additional details, refer to our Privacy Policy.
By clicking "I AGREE" below, you agree to our Privacy Policy and our personal data processing and cookie practices as described therein. You also acknowledge that this forum may be hosted outside your country and you consent to the collection, storage, and processing of your data in the country where this forum is hosted.
Leave a comment: