Announcement

Collapse
No announcement yet.

(marfi80) - editing advice

Collapse
X
 
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts

  • #31
    Hello everyone,

    I got the picture below rejected for being Undersharpened (soft).
    Could someone please give me some hint, which part(s) of the picture has issues with being soft? I was quite confident with it, otherwise I had not submitted it with 1920 px, but maybe I missed something...

    Thank you very much and best,
    marfi80

    https://www.jetphotos.com/viewqueued_b.php?id=8102301

    Click image for larger version  Name:	D-AIZU (6) final jpg 1920.jpg Views:	0 Size:	1.21 MB ID:	1088789

    Comment


    • #32
      Originally posted by marfi80 View Post
      Hello everyone,

      I got the picture below rejected for being Undersharpened (soft).
      Could someone please give me some hint, which part(s) of the picture has issues with being soft? I was quite confident with it, otherwise I had not submitted it with 1920 px, but maybe I missed something...

      Thank you very much and best,
      marfi80

      https://www.jetphotos.com/viewqueued_b.php?id=8102301

      Click image for larger version Name:	D-AIZU (6) final jpg 1920.jpg Views:	0 Size:	1.21 MB ID:	1088789
      Not much to say, whole aircraft is just soft.

      Comment


      • #33
        Hello everyone,

        I kindly ask for a prescreening of the picture below, in particular if it would have an issue with backlit (Sun pretty much directly from the front).

        Thanks and best,
        marfi80

        Click image for larger version

Name:	HB-JVQ (53) 1280.jpg
Views:	49
Size:	573.3 KB
ID:	1088936

        Comment


        • #34
          Originally posted by marfi80 View Post
          Hello everyone,

          I kindly ask for a prescreening of the picture below, in particular if it would have an issue with backlit (Sun pretty much directly from the front).

          Thanks and best,
          marfi80

          Click image for larger version

Name:	HB-JVQ (53) 1280.jpg
Views:	49
Size:	573.3 KB
ID:	1088936
          Borderline backlit, but should be (just) acceptable. Problems with softness/heathaze though.

          Comment


          • #35
            Thank you very much!

            Comment


            • #36
              Hello everyone,

              one question to potentially improve/rework a picture rejected due to "Over Processed / Bad postprocessing" (see below):
              I can see some halo at the rear of the tailfin, which might have caused the rejection (particularly visible in JPs equalizing tool). Any more overprocessed parts, I maybe missed?

              Thank you very much for your continouus help.
              Best,
              marfi80

              https://www.jetphotos.com/viewqueued_b.php?id=8113042

              Click image for larger version

Name:	D-AIBI (10) final jpg 1280.jpg
Views:	50
Size:	535.1 KB
ID:	1089249

              Comment


              • #37
                Originally posted by marfi80 View Post
                Hello everyone,

                one question to potentially improve/rework a picture rejected due to "Over Processed / Bad postprocessing" (see below):
                I can see some halo at the rear of the tailfin, which might have caused the rejection (particularly visible in JPs equalizing tool). Any more overprocessed parts, I maybe missed?
                No, just the editing halo.

                Comment


                • #38
                  Hello everyone,

                  I got the picture below rejected for being Over Processed / Bad postprocessing.
                  Could anyone please give me some hint, where exactly overprocessed parts are visible? I'm a little puzzled where to start reworking (if at all).

                  Thank you very much and best,
                  marfi80

                  https://www.jetphotos.com/viewqueued_b.php?id=8148144

                  Click image for larger version

Name:	D-AIRL (8) final jpg 1920.jpg
Views:	40
Size:	980.4 KB
ID:	1090421

                  Comment


                  • #39
                    Originally posted by marfi80 View Post
                    Hello everyone,

                    I got the picture below rejected for being Over Processed / Bad postprocessing.
                    Could anyone please give me some hint, where exactly overprocessed parts are visible? I'm a little puzzled where to start reworking (if at all).

                    Thank you very much and best,
                    marfi80

                    https://www.jetphotos.com/viewqueued_b.php?id=8148144
                    Editing halos visible around the tail.

                    Comment


                    • #40
                      Hello everyone,

                      I received one rejection due to JPG compression artefacts and would be happy about some feedback, where in particular compression an issue in the picture?

                      Just wondering whether and how to fix it, because it was a raw picture which I edited with my usual routine.
                      Thanks for any help and a nice weekend to everyone.

                      Best,
                      marfi80

                      https://www.jetphotos.com/viewqueued_b.php?id=8226814

                      Click image for larger version

Name:	B-2080 (7) jpg 1280 2  final.jpg
Views:	47
Size:	361.0 KB
ID:	1093252

                      Comment


                      • #41
                        Originally posted by marfi80 View Post
                        Hello everyone,

                        I received one rejection due to JPG compression artefacts and would be happy about some feedback, where in particular compression an issue in the picture?

                        Just wondering whether and how to fix it, because it was a raw picture which I edited with my usual routine.
                        Thanks for any help and a nice weekend to everyone.

                        Best,
                        marfi80

                        https://www.jetphotos.com/viewqueued_b.php?id=8226814

                        Click image for larger version

Name:	B-2080 (7) jpg 1280 2  final.jpg
Views:	47
Size:	361.0 KB
ID:	1093252
                        Sky is a bit blotchy, and there is a light 'fuzz' around the aircraft. Looks like a combination of compression and poor editing.

                        Comment


                        • #42
                          Hello everyone,

                          I got the picture below rejected for contrast. My question is, whether there's any more potential for improving the picture? Picture was taken at very early morning, so I cannot do much about the light conditions and I feel the editing was the maximum possible without overprocessing.

                          Thanks and best,
                          marfi80

                          https://www.jetphotos.com/viewqueued_b.php?id=8253215


                          Click image for larger version

Name:	HB-JVV jpg (19) final jpg 1260.jpg
Views:	26
Size:	835.2 KB
ID:	1093945

                          Comment


                          • #43
                            Originally posted by marfi80 View Post
                            Hello everyone,

                            I got the picture below rejected for contrast. My question is, whether there's any more potential for improving the picture? Picture was taken at very early morning, so I cannot do much about the light conditions and I feel the editing was the maximum possible without overprocessing.

                            Thanks and best,
                            marfi80

                            https://www.jetphotos.com/viewqueued_b.php?id=8253215


                            Click image for larger version

Name:	HB-JVV jpg (19) final jpg 1260.jpg
Views:	26
Size:	835.2 KB
ID:	1093945
                            There is potential for improving the photo. Please note, in addition to lacking contrast, it is also somewhat soft.

                            Comment


                            • #44
                              Hello everyone,

                              I got the picture below rejected for soft and Dirty Scan / CMOS Dust spots. Softness might be improvable, but I'm really wondering where there are dust spots in the picture. Maybe someone can help me out on where dust spots are.

                              Thanks for any hint and best,
                              marfi80

                              https://www.jetphotos.com/viewqueued_b.php?id=8268374

                              Click image for larger version

Name:	D-AIUH (6) jpg 1280 final.jpg
Views:	30
Size:	435.1 KB
ID:	1094311

                              Comment


                              • #45
                                Originally posted by marfi80 View Post
                                Hello everyone,

                                I got the picture below rejected for soft and Dirty Scan / CMOS Dust spots. Softness might be improvable, but I'm really wondering where there are dust spots in the picture. Maybe someone can help me out on where dust spots are.

                                Thanks for any hint and best,
                                marfi80

                                https://www.jetphotos.com/viewqueued_b.php?id=8268374
                                Click image for larger version  Name:	37486_1593937941.jpg Views:	0 Size:	444.4 KB ID:	1094313

                                Comment

                                Working...
                                X