Announcement

Collapse
No announcement yet.

(marfi80) - editing advice

Collapse
X
 
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts

  • kbpspotter
    replied
    It would also be great, if you fixed many dust spots that I can see.

    Leave a comment:


  • kbpspotter
    replied
    Originally posted by marfi80 View Post
    Hello everyone,

    I have one question about the possible cause for what looks like a weird artefact or so in the "check for dust tool" with one of my pictures.
    Below the outcome from JP's "check for dust tool" and the original picture, which I meanwhile removed from the cue (due to this artefact and also too much halos).

    What looks weird to me is the sudden change in color in the right part of the upper part of the picture in the "check for dust tool". Does anyone have an idea, what might cause this?
    And would this cause a rejection (provided rest of the picture was OK)?

    Thanks and best,
    marfi80




    Click image for larger version

Name:	ok-ema denoise tool.jpg
Views:	8
Size:	751.0 KB
ID:	1098974


    Click image for larger version

Name:	OK-EMA (1) jpg 1280 final sharpened 16.jpg
Views:	8
Size:	447.2 KB
ID:	1098973
    To avoid such a halos try not to touch the following things when editing: Highlights (keep it at 0), Clarity (at 0 as well)

    Leave a comment:


  • pdeboer
    replied
    Originally posted by marfi80 View Post
    Hello everyone,

    I have one question about the possible cause for what looks like a weird artefact or so in the "check for dust tool" with one of my pictures.
    Below the outcome from JP's "check for dust tool" and the original picture, which I meanwhile removed from the cue (due to this artefact and also too much halos).

    What looks weird to me is the sudden change in color in the right part of the upper part of the picture in the "check for dust tool". Does anyone have an idea, what might cause this?
    And would this cause a rejection (provided rest of the picture was OK)?

    Thanks and best,
    marfi80






    Could be several things, like selective noise reduction of the sky and later sharpening of the whole photo, or (automatic) correction of colour or contrast. It does not look that bad to me, to me it looks acceptable.

    Leave a comment:


  • marfi80
    replied
    Hello everyone,

    I have one question about the possible cause for what looks like a weird artefact or so in the "check for dust tool" with one of my pictures.
    Below the outcome from JP's "check for dust tool" and the original picture, which I meanwhile removed from the cue (due to this artefact and also too much halos).

    What looks weird to me is the sudden change in color in the right part of the upper part of the picture in the "check for dust tool". Does anyone have an idea, what might cause this?
    And would this cause a rejection (provided rest of the picture was OK)?

    Thanks and best,
    marfi80




    Click image for larger version

Name:	ok-ema denoise tool.jpg
Views:	8
Size:	751.0 KB
ID:	1098974


    Click image for larger version

Name:	OK-EMA (1) jpg 1280 final sharpened 16.jpg
Views:	8
Size:	447.2 KB
ID:	1098973

    Leave a comment:


  • dlowwa
    replied
    Originally posted by marfi80 View Post

    Thank you very much for your feedback, dlowwa.

    I changed some parameters on the processing / editing. This is the result with the same pictures and I kindly ask for some pre-screening for those. Thanks a million!

    Best,
    marfi80

    Click image for larger version

Name:	LZ-LAE.jpg
Views:	16
Size:	384.4 KB
ID:	1098156

    Click image for larger version

Name:	TC-LST.jpg
Views:	14
Size:	381.8 KB
ID:	1098157

    Click image for larger version

Name:	OE-LYV.jpg
Views:	14
Size:	411.2 KB
ID:	1098158
    Slightly soft and low in the frame, but otherwise should be ok.

    Leave a comment:


  • marfi80
    replied
    Yes, halos and weak contrast are both due to whatever processing you're doing. If you change that, your problems should hopefully be resolved.
    Thank you very much for your feedback, dlowwa.

    I changed some parameters on the processing / editing. This is the result with the same pictures and I kindly ask for some pre-screening for those. Thanks a million!

    Best,
    marfi80

    Click image for larger version

Name:	LZ-LAE.jpg
Views:	16
Size:	384.4 KB
ID:	1098156

    Click image for larger version

Name:	TC-LST.jpg
Views:	14
Size:	381.8 KB
ID:	1098157

    Click image for larger version

Name:	OE-LYV.jpg
Views:	14
Size:	411.2 KB
ID:	1098158

    Leave a comment:


  • dlowwa
    replied
    Originally posted by marfi80 View Post
    Hello everyone,

    I kindly ask for some editing advice:

    Over the last few weeks I got a couple of pictures of the same type rejected either due to Over Processed / Bad postprocessing or Contrast or both.
    Basically most of them are taken in front of a blue sky with good light conditions. Three recent examples are linked below.

    I didn't change my editing and as such I'm not really sure how to approach this. For the pictures below I can see some slight halos in terms of overprocessing. But I feel I got multiple pictures with such slight halos accepted in the past (maybe I was lucky then?). Also in terms of contrast the pictures have good light, no overcast, histogram (to me at least) looks good. But maybe I'm also completely misjudging the pictures...

    So as you see I feel that I'm doing something systematically wrong with the editing of such pictures, but not quite sure how to approach this. So I'm happy about any practical advise what I can improve here.

    Thanks and best,
    marfi80

    https://www.jetphotos.com/viewqueued_b.php?id=8367857

    https://www.jetphotos.com/viewqueued_b.php?id=8377233

    https://www.jetphotos.com/viewqueued_b.php?id=8377175
    Yes, halos and weak contrast are both due to whatever processing you're doing. If you change that, your problems should hopefully be resolved.

    Leave a comment:


  • marfi80
    replied
    Hello everyone,

    I kindly ask for some editing advice:

    Over the last few weeks I got a couple of pictures of the same type rejected either due to Over Processed / Bad postprocessing or Contrast or both.
    Basically most of them are taken in front of a blue sky with good light conditions. Three recent examples are linked below.

    I didn't change my editing and as such I'm not really sure how to approach this. For the pictures below I can see some slight halos in terms of overprocessing. But I feel I got multiple pictures with such slight halos accepted in the past (maybe I was lucky then?). Also in terms of contrast the pictures have good light, no overcast, histogram (to me at least) looks good. But maybe I'm also completely misjudging the pictures...

    So as you see I feel that I'm doing something systematically wrong with the editing of such pictures, but not quite sure how to approach this. So I'm happy about any practical advise what I can improve here.

    Thanks and best,
    marfi80

    https://www.jetphotos.com/viewqueued_b.php?id=8367857

    https://www.jetphotos.com/viewqueued_b.php?id=8377233

    https://www.jetphotos.com/viewqueued_b.php?id=8377175

    Leave a comment:


  • dlowwa
    replied
    Originally posted by marfi80 View Post
    Hello everyone,

    I got the picture below rejected for Over Processed / Bad postprocessing. What in particular is the issue here? I can see some slight halos, but I'm not sure whether they caused the rejection or I missed something else.

    Thanks for your help and best,
    marfi80

    https://www.jetphotos.com/viewqueued_b.php?id=8351728

    Click image for larger version

Name:	D-AIWD (29) jpg 1280 final.jpg
Views:	35
Size:	387.7 KB
ID:	1096918
    Yes, it is because of the editing halos.

    Leave a comment:


  • marfi80
    replied
    Hello everyone,

    I got the picture below rejected for Over Processed / Bad postprocessing. What in particular is the issue here? I can see some slight halos, but I'm not sure whether they caused the rejection or I missed something else.

    Thanks for your help and best,
    marfi80

    https://www.jetphotos.com/viewqueued_b.php?id=8351728

    Click image for larger version

Name:	D-AIWD (29) jpg 1280 final.jpg
Views:	35
Size:	387.7 KB
ID:	1096918

    Leave a comment:


  • marfi80
    replied
    Originally posted by dlowwa View Post

    Click image for larger version Name:	37486_1593937941.jpg Views:	0 Size:	444.4 KB ID:	1094313
    Uuuuh.... yeah, indeed. I didn't spot that one. Thanks.

    Leave a comment:


  • dlowwa
    replied
    Originally posted by marfi80 View Post
    Hello everyone,

    I got the picture below rejected for soft and Dirty Scan / CMOS Dust spots. Softness might be improvable, but I'm really wondering where there are dust spots in the picture. Maybe someone can help me out on where dust spots are.

    Thanks for any hint and best,
    marfi80

    https://www.jetphotos.com/viewqueued_b.php?id=8268374
    Click image for larger version  Name:	37486_1593937941.jpg Views:	0 Size:	444.4 KB ID:	1094313

    Leave a comment:


  • marfi80
    replied
    Hello everyone,

    I got the picture below rejected for soft and Dirty Scan / CMOS Dust spots. Softness might be improvable, but I'm really wondering where there are dust spots in the picture. Maybe someone can help me out on where dust spots are.

    Thanks for any hint and best,
    marfi80

    https://www.jetphotos.com/viewqueued_b.php?id=8268374

    Click image for larger version

Name:	D-AIUH (6) jpg 1280 final.jpg
Views:	30
Size:	435.1 KB
ID:	1094311

    Leave a comment:


  • dlowwa
    replied
    Originally posted by marfi80 View Post
    Hello everyone,

    I got the picture below rejected for contrast. My question is, whether there's any more potential for improving the picture? Picture was taken at very early morning, so I cannot do much about the light conditions and I feel the editing was the maximum possible without overprocessing.

    Thanks and best,
    marfi80

    https://www.jetphotos.com/viewqueued_b.php?id=8253215


    Click image for larger version

Name:	HB-JVV jpg (19) final jpg 1260.jpg
Views:	26
Size:	835.2 KB
ID:	1093945
    There is potential for improving the photo. Please note, in addition to lacking contrast, it is also somewhat soft.

    Leave a comment:


  • marfi80
    replied
    Hello everyone,

    I got the picture below rejected for contrast. My question is, whether there's any more potential for improving the picture? Picture was taken at very early morning, so I cannot do much about the light conditions and I feel the editing was the maximum possible without overprocessing.

    Thanks and best,
    marfi80

    https://www.jetphotos.com/viewqueued_b.php?id=8253215


    Click image for larger version

Name:	HB-JVV jpg (19) final jpg 1260.jpg
Views:	26
Size:	835.2 KB
ID:	1093945

    Leave a comment:

Working...
X