Announcement

Collapse
No announcement yet.

MaoTing - prescreening request / editing advice

Collapse
X
 
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts

  • dlowwa
    replied
    Originally posted by MaoTing View Post
    Hope to get suggestions
    Malaysia Airlines and Finland airlines have made adjustments.
    1. Click image for larger version Name:	J马航MTE-IMG_5672 副本.jpg Views:	0 Size:	676.6 KB ID:	1079073

    2.
    Click image for larger version Name:	J芬兰LWL-IMG_7913.jpg Views:	0 Size:	363.8 KB ID:	1079072

    3.
    Click image for larger version Name:	J-IMG_1326 副本.jpg Views:	0 Size:	448.0 KB ID:	1079071

    4. Click image for larger version Name:	J虎航XUG-IMG_6424 副本.jpg Views:	0 Size:	392.6 KB ID:	1079070

    5.
    Click image for larger version

Name:	J加航FIVX-IMG_1690 副本.jpg
Views:	91
Size:	374.6 KB
ID:	1079075
    Quality looks fine to me.

    Leave a comment:


  • MaoTing
    replied
    Hope to get suggestions
    Malaysia Airlines and Finland airlines have made adjustments.
    1. Click image for larger version  Name:	J马航MTE-IMG_5672 副本.jpg Views:	0 Size:	676.6 KB ID:	1079073

    2.
    Click image for larger version  Name:	J芬兰LWL-IMG_7913.jpg Views:	0 Size:	363.8 KB ID:	1079072

    3.
    Click image for larger version  Name:	J-IMG_1326 副本.jpg Views:	0 Size:	448.0 KB ID:	1079071

    4. Click image for larger version  Name:	J虎航XUG-IMG_6424 副本.jpg Views:	0 Size:	392.6 KB ID:	1079070

    5.
    Click image for larger version

Name:	J加航FIVX-IMG_1690 副本.jpg
Views:	91
Size:	374.6 KB
ID:	1079075

    Leave a comment:


  • MaoTing
    replied
    thank you LX-A343

    Leave a comment:


  • LX-A343
    replied
    Originally posted by MaoTing View Post
    Hope to get suggestions
    1.
    Click image for larger version

Name:	J泰国酷鸟XBD-IMG_1387 副本.jpg
Views:	151
Size:	460.9 KB
ID:	1078891

    2.
    Click image for larger version

Name:	J-IMG_6366 副本.jpg
Views:	114
Size:	440.0 KB
ID:	1078892

    3.In response to the last suggestion, I have readjusted Malaysia Airlines
    Click image for larger version

Name:	J马航MTE-IMG_5672 副本.jpg
Views:	112
Size:	704.4 KB
ID:	1078893
    1, 2: OK
    3: borderline overexposed and compression

    Leave a comment:


  • MaoTing
    replied
    Hope to get suggestions
    1.
    Click image for larger version

Name:	J泰国酷鸟XBD-IMG_1387 副本.jpg
Views:	151
Size:	460.9 KB
ID:	1078891

    2.
    Click image for larger version

Name:	J-IMG_6366 副本.jpg
Views:	114
Size:	440.0 KB
ID:	1078892

    3.In response to the last suggestion, I have readjusted Malaysia Airlines
    Click image for larger version

Name:	J马航MTE-IMG_5672 副本.jpg
Views:	112
Size:	704.4 KB
ID:	1078893

    Leave a comment:


  • MaoTing
    replied
    Originally posted by LX-A343 View Post

    The easiest is to equalize the photo. That way you will see vignetting better.
    Thank you very much. I will try this method to check my picture

    Leave a comment:


  • LX-A343
    replied
    Originally posted by MaoTing View Post
    I want to ask about vignetting. When editing a picture, in some cases, the vignetting is obvious. I can find and fix it. But the following rejection is a picture rejected vignetting, https://cdn.jetphotos.com/full/5/39704_1578486935.jpg
    It's very difficult for me to find gradual fainting. I want to know what I can do in PS so that I can check gradual fainting in advance.
    The easiest is to equalize the photo. That way you will see vignetting better.

    Leave a comment:


  • MaoTing
    replied
    I want to ask about vignetting. When editing a picture, in some cases, the vignetting is obvious. I can find and fix it. But the following rejection is a picture rejected vignetting, https://cdn.jetphotos.com/full/5/39704_1578486935.jpg
    It's very difficult for me to find gradual fainting. I want to know what I can do in PS so that I can check gradual fainting in advance.

    Leave a comment:


  • MaoTing
    replied
    Quality looks acceptable to me.
    thank you very much

    Leave a comment:


  • dlowwa
    replied
    Originally posted by MaoTing View Post
    Thanks for dlowwa's reply.
    Can you give some suggestions for the following pictures。I'm always uncertain about the heat haze in pic2.

    1.
    Click image for larger version Name:	J澳航EBB-IMG_6820.jpg Views:	0 Size:	365.7 KB ID:	1078544

    2.
    Click image for larger version Name:	J澳航OQE-IMG_5603 副本.jpg Views:	0 Size:	702.7 KB ID:	1078545

    3.
    Click image for larger version Name:	J汉莎AIMA-IMG_0613 副本.jpg Views:	0 Size:	350.7 KB ID:	1078546

    4. Click image for larger version Name:	J卡塔尔BAE-IMG_0933 副本.jpg Views:	0 Size:	443.4 KB ID:	1078547

    5. Click image for larger version Name:	J阿联酋EOY-IMG_1477 副本.jpg Views:	0 Size:	343.7 KB ID:	1078548
    Quality looks acceptable to me.

    Leave a comment:


  • MaoTing
    replied
    Thanks for dlowwa's reply.
    Can you give some suggestions for the following pictures。I'm always uncertain about the heat haze in pic2.

    1.
    Click image for larger version  Name:	J澳航EBB-IMG_6820.jpg Views:	0 Size:	365.7 KB ID:	1078544

    2.
    Click image for larger version  Name:	J澳航OQE-IMG_5603 副本.jpg Views:	0 Size:	702.7 KB ID:	1078545

    3.
    Click image for larger version  Name:	J汉莎AIMA-IMG_0613 副本.jpg Views:	0 Size:	350.7 KB ID:	1078546

    4. Click image for larger version  Name:	J卡塔尔BAE-IMG_0933 副本.jpg Views:	0 Size:	443.4 KB ID:	1078547

    5. Click image for larger version  Name:	J阿联酋EOY-IMG_1477 副本.jpg Views:	0 Size:	343.7 KB ID:	1078548

    Leave a comment:


  • dlowwa
    replied
    Originally posted by MaoTing View Post
    Thank you for your answer
    pic 4. The runway and I are not in a vertical relationship. The adjustment is based on the vertical axis.
    Indeed, but all of the verticals are leaning left, so..

    Leave a comment:


  • MaoTing
    replied
    Thank you for your answer
    pic 4. The runway and I are not in a vertical relationship. The adjustment is based on the vertical axis. The result looks really bad. Canon cameras are always soft, so they are more intensive sharpening, but the frequency of over sharpening is so high, it seems that I need to adjust the sharpening scale.

    Leave a comment:


  • dlowwa
    replied
    Originally posted by MaoTing View Post
    Hope to get suggestions.
    1. The shooting environment of this picture is not very good. I hope it can be corrected.
    Click image for larger version

Name:	J卡利塔航空703-IMG_9015.jpg
Views:	400
Size:	448.5 KB
ID:	1078394

    2.
    Click image for larger version

Name:	J虎航XUG-IMG_5773.jpg
Views:	387
Size:	480.8 KB
ID:	1078395

    3.
    Click image for larger version

Name:	J东航6129-IMG_5913.jpg
Views:	387
Size:	337.0 KB
ID:	1078396

    4.
    Click image for larger version

Name:	J华航18917-IMG_7097.jpg
Views:	387
Size:	733.3 KB
ID:	1078397

    5.
    Click image for larger version

Name:	J马航MTE-IMG_5672.jpg
Views:	387
Size:	719.6 KB
ID:	1078398
    1. borderline overexposed/noisy
    2. borderline heat haze/oversharpened
    3. ok
    4. heat haze, oversharpened, horizon, obstruction
    5. borderline oversharpened

    Leave a comment:


  • MaoTing
    replied
    Hope to get suggestions.
    1. The shooting environment of this picture is not very good. I hope it can be corrected.
    Click image for larger version

Name:	J卡利塔航空703-IMG_9015.jpg
Views:	400
Size:	448.5 KB
ID:	1078394

    2.
    Click image for larger version

Name:	J虎航XUG-IMG_5773.jpg
Views:	387
Size:	480.8 KB
ID:	1078395

    3.
    Click image for larger version

Name:	J东航6129-IMG_5913.jpg
Views:	387
Size:	337.0 KB
ID:	1078396

    4.
    Click image for larger version

Name:	J华航18917-IMG_7097.jpg
Views:	387
Size:	733.3 KB
ID:	1078397

    5.
    Click image for larger version

Name:	J马航MTE-IMG_5672.jpg
Views:	387
Size:	719.6 KB
ID:	1078398

    Leave a comment:

Working...
X