Announcement

Collapse
No announcement yet.

MaoTing - prescreening request / editing advice

Collapse
X
 
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts

  • MaoTing - prescreening request / editing advice

    Hello, English is not my native language, so I may have a deviation in my next statement, please forgive me.
    Please ask if Qantas' photos and geothermal impact on the aircraft are acceptable. The previous picture was rejected due to overexposure. What we see now is that the exposure has not been modified and is in the original state. Is this kind of exposure OK?
    Does the JPG compression of Ethiopian aerial image meet the requirements?
    Which category should be selected for general painting and standard painting?
    We are looking forward to your answer.
    Click image for larger version

Name:	image_28576.jpg
Views:	819
Size:	714.5 KB
ID:	1077769
    Click image for larger version  Name:	JWeb埃赛俄比亚ATY-IMG_0546.jpg Views:	0 Size:	378.4 KB ID:	1077770
    Last edited by MaoTing; 2020-01-08, 07:38. Reason: editing/rejection advice

  • #2
    Originally posted by MaoTing View Post
    Hello, English is not my native language, so I may have a deviation in my next statement, please forgive me.
    Please ask if Qantas' photos and geothermal impact on the aircraft are acceptable. The previous picture was rejected due to overexposure. What we see now is that the exposure has not been modified and is in the original state. Is this kind of exposure OK?
    Does the JPG compression of Ethiopian aerial image meet the requirements?
    Which category should be selected for general painting and standard painting?
    First one exposure should be ok, but aircraft is slightly low in the frame, and contrast a bit weak. Special Scheme category applies.

    Second one a bit soft, but compression is not an issue.

    Comment


    • #3
      Originally posted by dlowwa View Post

      First one exposure should be ok, but aircraft is slightly low in the frame, and contrast a bit weak. Special Scheme category applies.

      Second one a bit soft, but compression is not an issue.
      thank you very much
      Is the impact of heat emission on the aircraft acceptable. Qantas

      Comment


      • #4
        When uploading pictures, the registration number is automatically generated, but after uploading, the registration number is always lost. How to solve this problem? Rejected for lack of information. Thank you
        Click image for larger version

Name:	微信图片_20200108170325.png
Views:	567
Size:	8.4 KB
ID:	1077785

        Comment


        • #5
          Originally posted by MaoTing View Post
          When uploading pictures, the registration number is automatically generated, but after uploading, the registration number is always lost. How to solve this problem? Rejected for lack of information. Thank you
          Click image for larger version

Name:	微信图片_20200108170325.png
Views:	567
Size:	8.4 KB
ID:	1077785
          You will have to upload picture first, then put the registration number & airport code in the boxes above Auto-Fill. After that press Auto-Fill button, hope the registration will not be lost anymore

          Comment


          • #6
            Originally posted by Raihan Ahmed View Post

            You will have to upload picture first, then put the registration number & airport code in the boxes above Auto-Fill. After that press Auto-Fill button, hope the registration will not be lost anymore
            Thank you for your answer. That's what I did. First upload the picture, then fill in the registration number and airport code, and then fill it in automatically. After publishing, check again in the queue list, and the serial will be gone

            Comment


            • #7
              I repeated this many times, and tried to modify the information, but I couldn't save the serial#

              Comment


              • #8
                Originally posted by MaoTing View Post
                I repeated this many times, and tried to modify the information, but I couldn't save the serial#
                It's fine, don't worry. The serial always disappears on queue page. Once the image is accepted, the serial will magically appear.

                160 VN - 12 CZ - 5 KE - 4 TG - 4 CI - 4 AK - 4 VJ - 2 NH - 2 QR - 2 VZ - 1 QH - 1 CA - 1 MU - 1 SQ - 1 TR - 1 BL - 1 MH
                HAN HPH VII VDH HUI DAD CXR UIH SGN PQC KUL KCH SIN BKK CNX PNH HKG CAN PEK NKG HGH NNG PVG WUH ICN GMP PUS CJU TPE NRT HND ITM
                B78X - B789 - B788 - B77W - B773 - B772 - B744 - B739 - B738 - B737 - A388 - A359 - A333 - A332 - A321 - A21N - A320 - A319 - E190

                Comment


                • #9
                  QuocTrungTran. thank you very much

                  Comment


                  • #10
                    Originally posted by MaoTing View Post
                    I repeated this many times, and tried to modify the information, but I couldn't save the serial#
                    If you click on the Correct Info button and then Additional Option, you will be able to see the C/N it took from autofill or you filled.

                    Comment


                    • #11
                      Because the title here doesn't meet the requirements, I started a new post again. Thank you for helping me modify the title.
                      I'm sorry to overlook some of the rules.
                      I hope to get some suggestions to help me learn and improve
                      1.Qantas:I made some adjustments to Qantas' contrast
                      Click image for larger version  Name:	J澳航OEI-IMG_5947.jpg Views:	0 Size:	730.9 KB ID:	1078230

                      2.
                      Click image for larger version  Name:	fetch?id=1078189&d=1578839670.jpg Views:	0 Size:	474.1 KB ID:	1078232

                      3.
                      Click image for larger version  Name:	fetch?id=1078191&d=1578840687.jpg Views:	0 Size:	461.1 KB ID:	1078233

                      4.
                      Click image for larger version  Name:	fetch?id=1078190&d=1578839857.jpg Views:	0 Size:	348.6 KB ID:	1078231

                      Comment


                      • #12
                        Originally posted by MaoTing View Post
                        Because the title here doesn't meet the requirements, I started a new post again. Thank you for helping me modify the title.
                        I'm sorry to overlook some of the rules.
                        I hope to get some suggestions to help me learn and improve
                        1.Qantas:I made some adjustments to Qantas' contrast
                        Click image for larger version Name:	J澳航OEI-IMG_5947.jpg Views:	0 Size:	730.9 KB ID:	1078230

                        2.
                        Click image for larger version Name:	fetch?id=1078189&d=1578839670.jpg Views:	0 Size:	474.1 KB ID:	1078232

                        3.
                        Click image for larger version Name:	fetch?id=1078191&d=1578840687.jpg Views:	0 Size:	461.1 KB ID:	1078233

                        4.
                        Click image for larger version Name:	fetch?id=1078190&d=1578839857.jpg Views:	0 Size:	348.6 KB ID:	1078231
                        1. heat haze
                        2. ok
                        3-4 borderline oversharpened

                        Comment


                        • #13
                          Originally posted by dlowwa View Post

                          1. heat haze
                          2. ok
                          3-4 borderline oversharpened
                          Thank you for your answer
                          In my opinion, the heat haze did not deform the aircraft. I want to know if there are any related posts about the heat haze to learn so that I can know how acceptable it is and how rejected it will be.

                          Comment


                          • #14
                            Hope to get suggestions.
                            1. The shooting environment of this picture is not very good. I hope it can be corrected.
                            Click image for larger version

Name:	J卡利塔航空703-IMG_9015.jpg
Views:	275
Size:	448.5 KB
ID:	1078394

                            2.
                            Click image for larger version

Name:	J虎航XUG-IMG_5773.jpg
Views:	265
Size:	480.8 KB
ID:	1078395

                            3.
                            Click image for larger version

Name:	J东航6129-IMG_5913.jpg
Views:	264
Size:	337.0 KB
ID:	1078396

                            4.
                            Click image for larger version

Name:	J华航18917-IMG_7097.jpg
Views:	264
Size:	733.3 KB
ID:	1078397

                            5.
                            Click image for larger version

Name:	J马航MTE-IMG_5672.jpg
Views:	266
Size:	719.6 KB
ID:	1078398

                            Comment


                            • #15
                              Originally posted by MaoTing View Post
                              Hope to get suggestions.
                              1. The shooting environment of this picture is not very good. I hope it can be corrected.
                              Click image for larger version

Name:	J卡利塔航空703-IMG_9015.jpg
Views:	275
Size:	448.5 KB
ID:	1078394

                              2.
                              Click image for larger version

Name:	J虎航XUG-IMG_5773.jpg
Views:	265
Size:	480.8 KB
ID:	1078395

                              3.
                              Click image for larger version

Name:	J东航6129-IMG_5913.jpg
Views:	264
Size:	337.0 KB
ID:	1078396

                              4.
                              Click image for larger version

Name:	J华航18917-IMG_7097.jpg
Views:	264
Size:	733.3 KB
ID:	1078397

                              5.
                              Click image for larger version

Name:	J马航MTE-IMG_5672.jpg
Views:	266
Size:	719.6 KB
ID:	1078398
                              1. borderline overexposed/noisy
                              2. borderline heat haze/oversharpened
                              3. ok
                              4. heat haze, oversharpened, horizon, obstruction
                              5. borderline oversharpened

                              Comment

                              Working...
                              X