Announcement

Collapse
No announcement yet.

Steve Worner - prescreening request / editing advice

Collapse
X
 
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts

  • #16
    Originally posted by steveworner View Post
    Thank you again. Can I please get an indication as to whether this image has JP potential?

    Click image for larger version Name:	Saab 340 ZLJ 1280 v2.jpg Views:	0 Size:	626.3 KB ID:	1078283
    Not a very attractive angle, this whole side of the aircraft is in shadow. As such, likely contrast/dark/backlit rejection.

    Comment


    • #17
      Thanks for the advice, I won't persist with that one any further.

      Can I get an opinion on this pic?

      Click image for larger version

Name:	Jetstar A320 VGZ 1280.jpg
Views:	120
Size:	392.1 KB
ID:	1078389

      Comment


      • #18
        Originally posted by steveworner View Post
        Thanks for the advice, I won't persist with that one any further.

        Can I get an opinion on this pic?

        Click image for larger version

Name:	Jetstar A320 VGZ 1280.jpg
Views:	120
Size:	392.1 KB
ID:	1078389
        Minus dust and editing halos, should be ok.

        Comment


        • #19
          Is this version an improvement? Click image for larger version

Name:	Jetstar A320 high sharp 1280.jpg
Views:	114
Size:	382.3 KB
ID:	1078493

          Comment


          • #20
            Originally posted by steveworner View Post
            Is this version an improvement? Click image for larger version

Name:	Jetstar A320 high sharp 1280.jpg
Views:	114
Size:	382.3 KB
ID:	1078493
            It would also be rejected for overprocessed.

            Comment


            • #21
              Thanks for the advice, I've re-done it with minimal processing. How does it look?

              Click image for larger version

Name:	Jetstar A320 minimal process 1280 standard sharp.jpg
Views:	100
Size:	400.2 KB
ID:	1078554

              Comment


              • #22
                Originally posted by steveworner View Post
                Thanks for the advice, I've re-done it with minimal processing. How does it look?

                Click image for larger version

Name:	Jetstar A320 minimal process 1280 standard sharp.jpg
Views:	100
Size:	400.2 KB
ID:	1078554
                Editing halos still present.

                Comment


                • #23
                  Thanks: I'll give that one a rest, it's giving me too much frustration!

                  Has this one got JP potential? Click image for larger version  Name:	Qantas A330 16x9 1280.jpg Views:	0 Size:	347.1 KB ID:	1078612

                  Comment


                  • #24
                    Originally posted by steveworner View Post
                    Thanks: I'll give that one a rest, it's giving me too much frustration!

                    Has this one got JP potential? Click image for larger version Name:	Qantas A330 16x9 1280.jpg Views:	0 Size:	347.1 KB ID:	1078612
                    Would be rejected for dark/contrast. Possibly fixable.

                    Comment


                    • #25
                      How about this version?
                      Click image for larger version

Name:	Qantas A330 minimal processing.jpg
Views:	92
Size:	337.3 KB
ID:	1078617

                      Comment


                      • #26
                        Originally posted by steveworner View Post
                        How about this version?
                        Click image for larger version

Name:	Qantas A330 minimal processing.jpg
Views:	92
Size:	337.3 KB
ID:	1078617
                        Hardly any difference. Still too dark and lacking contrast.
                        My photos on Flickr www.flickr.com/photos/geridominguez

                        Comment


                        • #27
                          How about this version?

                          Click image for larger version

Name:	Qantas A330 rework.jpg
Views:	85
Size:	348.4 KB
ID:	1078631

                          Comment


                          • #28
                            Originally posted by steveworner View Post
                            How about this version?

                            Click image for larger version

Name:	Qantas A330 rework.jpg
Views:	85
Size:	348.4 KB
ID:	1078631
                            Brighter, but still borderline for contrast.

                            Comment


                            • #29
                              When you say ‘borderline for contrast’, are you saying the image currently has too much contrast, or not enough?

                              Comment


                              • #30
                                Originally posted by steveworner View Post
                                When you say ‘borderline for contrast’, are you saying the image currently has too much contrast, or not enough?
                                borderline means exactly that: borderline. Maybe it will get accepted, maybe not.
                                My photos on Flickr www.flickr.com/photos/geridominguez

                                Comment

                                Working...
                                X