Announcement

Collapse
No announcement yet.

Steve Worner - prescreening request / editing advice

Collapse
X
 
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts

  • Thank you,

    Does this version improve things enough?

    Click image for larger version

Name:	Vamos A330 EC-NCK 1920 v3.jpg
Views:	105
Size:	1.01 MB
ID:	1186619

    Comment


    • Originally posted by steveworner View Post
      Thank you,

      Does this version improve things enough?
      Improved yes. Enough, couldn't promise.

      Comment


      • Thank you.

        I had a rejection for 'soft' on an image. I've given a re-sharpen. Would this version make the cut?

        Click image for larger version

Name:	PAL A321 RP-C9936 1920 v4.jpg
Views:	96
Size:	1.09 MB
ID:	1186772

        Comment


        • Originally posted by steveworner View Post
          Thank you.

          I had a rejection for 'soft' on an image. I've given a re-sharpen. Would this version make the cut?
          I would reject this for soft. Left side is soft.

          Comment


          • Thank you,

            Would this image from the same sequence (a couple of frames later) make the cut?

            Click image for larger version

Name:	PAL A321 RP-C9936 1920 v3.jpg
Views:	84
Size:	754.8 KB
ID:	1186840

            Comment


            • Originally posted by steveworner View Post
              Thank you,

              Would this image from the same sequence (a couple of frames later) make the cut?
              Also soft left side.

              Comment


              • Thank you,

                I've found a third image from the sequence that looks okay so I'll see how that goes.

                Can I get an opinion on this image? it's cropped to 1:1 and I'm not sure if JP have a policy on that.

                Click image for larger version

Name:	Qantas B787 VH-ZNM approach light 1920 v2.jpg
Views:	76
Size:	1.13 MB
ID:	1187399

                Comment


                • Originally posted by steveworner View Post
                  Thank you,

                  I've found a third image from the sequence that looks okay so I'll see how that goes.

                  Can I get an opinion on this image? it's cropped to 1:1 and I'm not sure if JP have a policy on that.
                  All images must be within the 4:3 - 16:9 range.

                  Comment


                  • Thank you, I've been able to crop it down to a 16:11 format, which I think is within JP requirements.

                    Would this version make the cut quality-wise?

                    Click image for larger version

Name:	Qantas B787 VH-ZNM approach light 1920 v4.jpg
Views:	60
Size:	838.7 KB
ID:	1187488

                    Comment


                    • Originally posted by steveworner View Post
                      Thank you, I've been able to crop it down to a 16:11 format, which I think is within JP requirements.

                      Would this version make the cut quality-wise?
                      Soft, and images that only show the non-lit side of the aircraft tend not to do well in screening.

                      Comment


                      • Thank you,

                        Can I get feedback on these two images?

                        Click image for larger version

Name:	Emirates A380 A6-EEU 1920 v4.jpg
Views:	37
Size:	1.01 MB
ID:	1188664

                        Click image for larger version  Name:	SilkWay B747-8 1920 v3.jpg Views:	0 Size:	829.1 KB ID:	1188663

                        Comment


                        • Originally posted by steveworner View Post
                          Thank you,

                          Can I get feedback on these two images?
                          Borderline soft.

                          Comment


                          • Thank you,

                            Can I get an opinion on this image?

                            Click image for larger version

Name:	SQ B787 nose 1920 v2.jpg
Views:	34
Size:	742.0 KB
ID:	1188972

                            Comment


                            • Originally posted by steveworner View Post
                              Thank you,

                              Can I get an opinion on this image?
                              Quality-wise, only issue I see is some purple fringing/CA. Crop is subjective. Probably ok, but it's a bit awkward.

                              Comment


                              • Thank you,

                                Can I get feedback on this freighter?

                                It was flying pretty much directly at the sun - not an angle I'd usually try for.

                                Click image for larger version

Name:	MAS Cargo A330 9M-MUA 1920.jpg
Views:	13
Size:	1,008.8 KB
ID:	1191934

                                Comment

                                Working...
                                X