Announcement

Collapse
No announcement yet.

Steve Worner - prescreening request / editing advice

Collapse
X
 
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts

  • #46
    Originally posted by steveworner View Post
    Click image for larger version

Name:	QF A330 rework 1280.jpg
Views:	103
Size:	449.8 KB
ID:	1079167 Ah, okay - can I get feedback on this image?
    Slightly flat, but otherwise should be ok.

    Comment


    • #47
      Thank you! do you think either of the images below have JP potential?

      Click image for larger version

Name:	QF 787 1280.jpg
Views:	89
Size:	456.2 KB
ID:	1079251
      Click image for larger version

Name:	SQ 777 1280.jpg
Views:	82
Size:	488.4 KB
ID:	1079252

      Comment


      • #48
        Originally posted by steveworner View Post
        Thank you! do you think either of the images below have JP potential?

        Click image for larger version

Name:	QF 787 1280.jpg
Views:	89
Size:	456.2 KB
ID:	1079251
        Click image for larger version

Name:	SQ 777 1280.jpg
Views:	82
Size:	488.4 KB
ID:	1079252
        Both are soft, and could probably use a slightly tighter crop on the left. First also lacking contrast a bit.

        Comment


        • #49
          Thank you, I was concerned they would be soft. Can I get some feedback on this 737?

          Click image for larger version

Name:	Virgin 737 VOS 1280.jpg
Views:	92
Size:	425.4 KB
ID:	1079276

          Comment


          • #50
            Originally posted by steveworner View Post
            Thank you, I was concerned they would be soft. Can I get some feedback on this 737?

            Click image for larger version

Name:	Virgin 737 VOS 1280.jpg
Views:	92
Size:	425.4 KB
ID:	1079276
            Also a touch soft, but would be ok for me.

            Comment


            • #51
              Thank you, and I also point out that my acceptance rate has improved significantly since I started seeking advice from this forum, so thank you for that, too.

              This ANZ Dreamliner has been a real challenge in that there is a lot of white and grey in the image. How does it look to a screener?

              Click image for larger version

Name:	ANZ 787 26 Jan.jpg
Views:	90
Size:	372.9 KB
ID:	1079317

              Comment


              • #52
                Originally posted by steveworner View Post
                Thank you, and I also point out that my acceptance rate has improved significantly since I started seeking advice from this forum, so thank you for that, too.

                This ANZ Dreamliner has been a real challenge in that there is a lot of white and grey in the image. How does it look to a screener?

                Click image for larger version

Name:	ANZ 787 26 Jan.jpg
Views:	90
Size:	372.9 KB
ID:	1079317
                Looks fine to me.

                Comment


                • #53
                  Thank you!

                  What do you think of these images of S92s? they are three different aircraft in quite hazy conditions.
                  Click image for larger version

Name:	S92 IPX 27 Jan.jpg
Views:	70
Size:	505.7 KB
ID:	1079465Click image for larger version

Name:	S92 ISP 27 Jan.jpg
Views:	63
Size:	544.5 KB
ID:	1079466Click image for larger version

Name:	S92 ISV 27 Jan.jpg
Views:	63
Size:	421.0 KB
ID:	1079467

                  Comment


                  • #54
                    Originally posted by steveworner View Post
                    Thank you!

                    What do you think of these images of S92s? they are three different aircraft in quite hazy conditions.
                    Click image for larger version

Name:	S92 IPX 27 Jan.jpg
Views:	70
Size:	505.7 KB
ID:	1079465Click image for larger version

Name:	S92 ISP 27 Jan.jpg
Views:	63
Size:	544.5 KB
ID:	1079466Click image for larger version

Name:	S92 ISV 27 Jan.jpg
Views:	63
Size:	421.0 KB
ID:	1079467
                    1. dark/backlit, vignetting, dirty
                    2. dark, soft
                    3. borderline contrast

                    Not a very appealing angle imho, but that alone shouldn't be cause for a rejection.

                    Comment


                    • #55
                      Thank you for the advice. What do you think of this cropped-down image? would it meet the JP requirements for processing as well as for framing?

                      Click image for larger version

Name:	Scoot 787 close.jpg
Views:	71
Size:	554.8 KB
ID:	1079498

                      Comment


                      • #56
                        Originally posted by steveworner View Post
                        Thank you for the advice. What do you think of this cropped-down image? would it meet the JP requirements for processing as well as for framing?

                        Click image for larger version

Name:	Scoot 787 close.jpg
Views:	71
Size:	554.8 KB
ID:	1079498
                        This would certainly be a rejection for Cut Off due to the poor crop.

                        Comment


                        • #57
                          Thanks, I won't persist with that one. Can I get feedback on the A320s below? I've tried taking a very light touch with post-processing.

                          Click image for larger version  Name:	Air Asia A320 1280.jpg Views:	0 Size:	438.0 KB ID:	1079615Click image for larger version

Name:	Virgin A320 VNB 1280.jpg
Views:	52
Size:	508.3 KB
ID:	1079617
                          Attached Files

                          Comment


                          • #58
                            Originally posted by steveworner View Post
                            Thanks, I won't persist with that one. Can I get feedback on the A320s below? I've tried taking a very light touch with post-processing.

                            Click image for larger version Name:	Air Asia A320 1280.jpg Views:	0 Size:	438.0 KB ID:	1079615Click image for larger version

Name:	Virgin A320 VNB 1280.jpg
Views:	52
Size:	508.3 KB
ID:	1079617
                            Would be ok for me.

                            Comment


                            • #59
                              Thank you! what do you think of this A380?

                              Click image for larger version

Name:	Qatar A380 rework.jpg
Views:	53
Size:	406.7 KB
ID:	1079688

                              Comment


                              • #60
                                Originally posted by steveworner View Post
                                Thank you! what do you think of this A380?

                                Click image for larger version

Name:	Qatar A380 rework.jpg
Views:	53
Size:	406.7 KB
ID:	1079688
                                Maybe a touch soft, but would be ok for me.

                                Comment

                                Working...
                                X