Announcement

Collapse
No announcement yet.

Steve Worner - prescreening request / editing advice

Collapse
X
 
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts

  • dlowwa
    replied
    Originally posted by steveworner View Post
    Thank you,

    Can I get feedback on this freighter?

    It was flying pretty much directly at the sun - not an angle I'd usually try for.
    Borderline for the angle/contrast.

    Leave a comment:


  • steveworner
    replied
    Thank you,

    Can I get feedback on this freighter?

    It was flying pretty much directly at the sun - not an angle I'd usually try for.

    Click image for larger version

Name:	MAS Cargo A330 9M-MUA 1920.jpg
Views:	10
Size:	1,008.8 KB
ID:	1191934

    Leave a comment:


  • dlowwa
    replied
    Originally posted by steveworner View Post
    Thank you,

    Can I get an opinion on this image?
    Quality-wise, only issue I see is some purple fringing/CA. Crop is subjective. Probably ok, but it's a bit awkward.

    Leave a comment:


  • steveworner
    replied
    Thank you,

    Can I get an opinion on this image?

    Click image for larger version

Name:	SQ B787 nose 1920 v2.jpg
Views:	33
Size:	742.0 KB
ID:	1188972

    Leave a comment:


  • dlowwa
    replied
    Originally posted by steveworner View Post
    Thank you,

    Can I get feedback on these two images?
    Borderline soft.

    Leave a comment:


  • steveworner
    replied
    Thank you,

    Can I get feedback on these two images?

    Click image for larger version

Name:	Emirates A380 A6-EEU 1920 v4.jpg
Views:	36
Size:	1.01 MB
ID:	1188664

    Click image for larger version  Name:	SilkWay B747-8 1920 v3.jpg Views:	0 Size:	829.1 KB ID:	1188663

    Leave a comment:


  • dlowwa
    replied
    Originally posted by steveworner View Post
    Thank you, I've been able to crop it down to a 16:11 format, which I think is within JP requirements.

    Would this version make the cut quality-wise?
    Soft, and images that only show the non-lit side of the aircraft tend not to do well in screening.

    Leave a comment:


  • steveworner
    replied
    Thank you, I've been able to crop it down to a 16:11 format, which I think is within JP requirements.

    Would this version make the cut quality-wise?

    Click image for larger version

Name:	Qantas B787 VH-ZNM approach light 1920 v4.jpg
Views:	58
Size:	838.7 KB
ID:	1187488

    Leave a comment:


  • dlowwa
    replied
    Originally posted by steveworner View Post
    Thank you,

    I've found a third image from the sequence that looks okay so I'll see how that goes.

    Can I get an opinion on this image? it's cropped to 1:1 and I'm not sure if JP have a policy on that.
    All images must be within the 4:3 - 16:9 range.

    Leave a comment:


  • steveworner
    replied
    Thank you,

    I've found a third image from the sequence that looks okay so I'll see how that goes.

    Can I get an opinion on this image? it's cropped to 1:1 and I'm not sure if JP have a policy on that.

    Click image for larger version

Name:	Qantas B787 VH-ZNM approach light 1920 v2.jpg
Views:	75
Size:	1.13 MB
ID:	1187399

    Leave a comment:


  • dlowwa
    replied
    Originally posted by steveworner View Post
    Thank you,

    Would this image from the same sequence (a couple of frames later) make the cut?
    Also soft left side.

    Leave a comment:


  • steveworner
    replied
    Thank you,

    Would this image from the same sequence (a couple of frames later) make the cut?

    Click image for larger version

Name:	PAL A321 RP-C9936 1920 v3.jpg
Views:	83
Size:	754.8 KB
ID:	1186840

    Leave a comment:


  • dlowwa
    replied
    Originally posted by steveworner View Post
    Thank you.

    I had a rejection for 'soft' on an image. I've given a re-sharpen. Would this version make the cut?
    I would reject this for soft. Left side is soft.

    Leave a comment:


  • steveworner
    replied
    Thank you.

    I had a rejection for 'soft' on an image. I've given a re-sharpen. Would this version make the cut?

    Click image for larger version

Name:	PAL A321 RP-C9936 1920 v4.jpg
Views:	95
Size:	1.09 MB
ID:	1186772

    Leave a comment:


  • dlowwa
    replied
    Originally posted by steveworner View Post
    Thank you,

    Does this version improve things enough?
    Improved yes. Enough, couldn't promise.

    Leave a comment:

Working...
X