Announcement

Collapse
No announcement yet.

Steve Worner - prescreening request / editing advice

Collapse
X
 
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts

  • steveworner
    replied
    Thank you, and a Happy New Year to you!

    Would this image

    Click image for larger version  Name:	Qatar A380 A7-APH v2 1920.jpg Views:	0 Size:	1.04 MB ID:	1151825
    Be rejected due to being too similar to this one of the same aircraft?

    A7-APH. Airbus A380-861. JetPhotos.com is the biggest database of aviation photographs with over 5 million screened photos online!


    They were captured a bit less than three years apart.

    Leave a comment:


  • dlowwa
    replied
    Originally posted by steveworner View Post
    Thank you,

    I won't persist with either of them - in fact that A330 is a daily visitor and I've had another attempt now that the sun is setting later in Australia. Can I get feedback on these images?
    Some softness visible on the first, otherwise ok for me.

    Leave a comment:


  • steveworner
    replied
    Thank you,

    I won't persist with either of them - in fact that A330 is a daily visitor and I've had another attempt now that the sun is setting later in Australia. Can I get feedback on these images?

    Click image for larger version

Name:	Scoot A321neo 9V-NCA 1920 v2.jpg
Views:	73
Size:	952.0 KB
ID:	1150987

    Click image for larger version  Name:	Vamos A330 EC-NCK 1920.jpg Views:	0 Size:	937.0 KB ID:	1150982

    Leave a comment:


  • dlowwa
    replied
    Originally posted by steveworner View Post
    Thank you, I won't persist with that one.

    Can I get feedback on these two late afternoon images?
    1. dirty, too far
    2. dark/contrast

    Leave a comment:


  • steveworner
    replied
    Thank you, I won't persist with that one.

    Can I get feedback on these two late afternoon images?

    Click image for larger version

Name:	Batik B737 9M-LRJ 1920.jpg
Views:	87
Size:	1.02 MB
ID:	1149167Click image for larger version

Name:	Wamos Air A330 EC-NCK 1920.jpg
Views:	78
Size:	1,009.4 KB
ID:	1149168

    Leave a comment:


  • dlowwa
    replied
    Originally posted by steveworner View Post
    Thank you.

    Would this image, a few frames later in the sequence, make the cut?
    Soft, and maybe a touch low in the frame.

    Leave a comment:


  • steveworner
    replied
    Thank you.

    Would this image, a few frames later in the sequence, make the cut?

    Click image for larger version

Name:	SQ A350 take off 1920 v3.jpg
Views:	41
Size:	839.1 KB
ID:	1148145

    Leave a comment:


  • dlowwa
    replied
    Originally posted by steveworner View Post
    Thank you.

    Can I get an opinion on this take-off shot?
    Would be rejected for too far, and possible soft/horizon.

    Leave a comment:


  • steveworner
    replied
    Thank you.

    Can I get an opinion on this take-off shot?

    Click image for larger version

Name:	SQ A350 take off 1920.jpg
Views:	40
Size:	1.15 MB
ID:	1148067

    Leave a comment:


  • dlowwa
    replied
    Originally posted by steveworner View Post
    Thank you!

    Can I get feedback on this B787 post-sunset shot?
    Would be rejected for too far/centering.

    Leave a comment:


  • steveworner
    replied
    Thank you!

    Can I get feedback on this B787 post-sunset shot?

    Click image for larger version

Name:	Scoot take off 1920.jpg
Views:	49
Size:	1.31 MB
ID:	1147840

    Leave a comment:


  • dlowwa
    replied
    Originally posted by steveworner View Post
    Thanks, I won't persist with that one.

    Can I get an opinion on these two B777s?

    There's actually two parts to this question: firstly the technical aspects of the image but also the broader criteria for JP on images like these where only the most forward section of the aircraft is visible (so most of the fuselage is out of frame, and of course the wings aren't visible).
    Crop will be a subjective/borderline decision by the screener, as there is no set guidelines. For me, these crops are a little too awkward to work. Can't comment on the quality since you can't upload images larger than 1920pix.

    Leave a comment:


  • steveworner
    replied
    Thanks, I won't persist with that one.

    Can I get an opinion on these two B777s?

    There's actually two parts to this question: firstly the technical aspects of the image but also the broader criteria for JP on images like these where only the most forward section of the aircraft is visible (so most of the fuselage is out of frame, and of course the wings aren't visible).

    Click image for larger version

Name:	Emirates 1 1920.jpg
Views:	63
Size:	1,010.0 KB
ID:	1146999Click image for larger version

Name:	Qatar 2 1920.jpg
Views:	48
Size:	1.04 MB
ID:	1147000

    Leave a comment:


  • dlowwa
    replied
    Originally posted by steveworner View Post
    Thank you,

    Can I get an opinion on this 'sunset' B777?

    Click image for larger version

Name:	Qatar B777 25 Year JP.jpg
Views:	74
Size:	841.7 KB
ID:	1145967
    Dark, borderline soft/vignetting/overprocessed. Also looks like you may have done a poor job of removing something beneath the tail.

    Leave a comment:


  • steveworner
    replied
    Thank you,

    Can I get an opinion on this 'sunset' B777?

    Click image for larger version

Name:	Qatar B777 25 Year JP.jpg
Views:	74
Size:	841.7 KB
ID:	1145967

    Leave a comment:

Working...
X