Announcement

Collapse
No announcement yet.

Editing Advice - Oliver Dave

Collapse
X
 
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts

  • dlowwa
    replied
    Originally posted by Oliver Dave View Post
    I turned off a box called 'optimised' which made the file smaller but it doesn't look like it made a difference. Could noise cause what looks like compression?Click image for larger version

Name:	765_rsaf_1232-2-NEW.jpg
Views:	12
Size:	247.9 KB
ID:	1084033
    Sky still somewhat compressed (among other issues).

    Leave a comment:


  • Oliver Dave
    replied
    I turned off a box called 'optimised' which made the file smaller but it doesn't look like it made a difference. Could noise cause what looks like compression?Click image for larger version

Name:	765_rsaf_1232-2-NEW.jpg
Views:	12
Size:	247.9 KB
ID:	1084033

    Leave a comment:


  • dlowwa
    replied
    Originally posted by Oliver Dave View Post
    https://www.jetphotos.com/viewqueued_b.php?id=7969135

    Hi, I've been getting compression rejects occasionally. I shoot RAW and save all edits as 100% quality Jpegs. I use photoshop to resize before then using the smart sharpen feature. Was wondering what the issue is. Thanks. PS in the linked reject is the contrast too high or low? I can't tell. Thanks as always.
    Double check your save settings, definite compression visible especially in the sky. Contrast is too low.

    Leave a comment:


  • Oliver Dave
    replied
    https://www.jetphotos.com/viewqueued_b.php?id=7969135

    Hi, I've been getting compression rejects occasionally. I shoot RAW and save all edits as 100% quality Jpegs. I use photoshop to resize before then using the smart sharpen feature. Was wondering what the issue is. Thanks. PS in the linked reject is the contrast too high or low? I can't tell. Thanks as always.

    Leave a comment:


  • dlowwa
    replied
    Originally posted by Oliver Dave View Post
    Click image for larger version

Name:	RSAF_678_0061.jpg
Views:	44
Size:	237.1 KB
ID:	1082152Hi, could I get some pre-screening advice on this? Thanks as always.
    Very borderline for contrast, and compression a bit too.

    Leave a comment:


  • Oliver Dave
    replied
    Click image for larger version

Name:	RSAF_678_0061.jpg
Views:	44
Size:	237.1 KB
ID:	1082152Hi, could I get some pre-screening advice on this? Thanks as always.

    Leave a comment:


  • dlowwa
    replied
    Originally posted by Oliver Dave View Post
    Hi, I have worked on those areas indicated. How is this? Thanks a lot.Click image for larger version  Name:	169295_F35B_16FEB20_0964-3.jpg Views:	0 Size:	368.5 KB ID:	1081085
    Likely to be rejected for soft, contrast, color, and noise. Quality is not there for this one, I'm afraid. I would advise passing on this one and trying with something else.

    Leave a comment:


  • Oliver Dave
    replied
    Hi, I have worked on those areas indicated. How is this? Thanks a lot.Click image for larger version

Name:	169295_F35B_16FEB20_0964-3.jpg
Views:	38
Size:	368.5 KB
ID:	1081085

    Leave a comment:


  • dlowwa
    replied
    Originally posted by Oliver Dave View Post
    Hi, could I get some pre-screening advice on this? It's my first time editing a fighter image. Cheers and thank you.
    Click image for larger version

Name:	F35B_16FEB20_0964-2.jpg
Views:	50
Size:	379.4 KB
ID:	1080937
    This would be rejected for dark/contrast and soft.

    Leave a comment:


  • Oliver Dave
    replied
    Hi, could I get some pre-screening advice on this? It's my first time editing a fighter image. Cheers and thank you.
    Click image for larger version

Name:	F35B_16FEB20_0964-2.jpg
Views:	50
Size:	379.4 KB
ID:	1080937

    Leave a comment:


  • dlowwa
    replied
    Originally posted by Oliver Dave View Post
    https://www.jetphotos.com/viewqueued_b.php?id=7854203
    https://www.jetphotos.com/viewqueued_b.php?id=7854244
    Hi, I have fixed the halo issue however I've still gotten these 2 rejections for being over processed. Would be great if I could know what the issue is. Thanks a lot for your help.
    Looks more like a compression issue than overprocessing. There is very noticeable banding in the sky.

    Leave a comment:


  • Oliver Dave
    replied
    https://www.jetphotos.com/viewqueued_b.php?id=7854203
    https://www.jetphotos.com/viewqueued_b.php?id=7854244
    Hi, I have fixed the halo issue however I've still gotten these 2 rejections for being over processed. Would be great if I could know what the issue is. Thanks a lot for your help.

    Leave a comment:


  • dlowwa
    replied
    Originally posted by Oliver Dave View Post
    https://www.jetphotos.com/viewqueued_b.php?id=7848973
    Hi, was this rejected for having too much contrast? If so, what are the tell-tale signs of too much contrast? Thanks a lot for the help.
    Contrast is a little bit too strong, but I would have accepted it.

    Leave a comment:


  • Oliver Dave
    replied
    https://www.jetphotos.com/viewqueued_b.php?id=7848973
    Hi, was this rejected for having too much contrast? If so, what are the tell-tale signs of too much contrast? Thanks a lot for the help.

    Leave a comment:


  • dlowwa
    replied
    Originally posted by Oliver Dave View Post
    Sorry just to clarify, editing halos are the blacks areas at the top of the aircraft when seen through 'check for dust'?
    Visible around engines, wing, and tail, yes.

    Leave a comment:

Working...
X