Announcement

Collapse
No announcement yet.

Simon B-prescreening request

Collapse
X
 
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts

  • Originally posted by dlowwa View Post

    Generally ok for a silhouette, but overall quality is not there. Would be rejected for soft/blurry.
    Ok, thank you. I’ve upped sharpness to the point where the edge of the plane is pretty pixelated, to my eye borderline over sharpened, but if I have learned anything on Jetphotos it’s that I have a terrible eye for sharpness. Plus I don’t know how significant the blurry component is and that obviously can’t be fixed. Is this enough? Or is this photo unfixable?

    Attached Files

    Comment


    • Originally posted by Simon B View Post

      Ok, thank you. I’ve upped sharpness to the point where the edge of the plane is pretty pixelated, to my eye borderline over sharpened, but if I have learned anything on Jetphotos it’s that I have a terrible eye for sharpness. Plus I don’t know how significant the blurry component is and that obviously can’t be fixed. Is this enough? Or is this photo unfixable?
      Still blurry, so I'd assume not fixable.

      Comment


      • Originally posted by dlowwa View Post

        Still blurry, so I'd assume not fixable.
        Alright, thank you.

        Comment


        • For the Stat helicopter I have a question about this photo as it pertains to back lit and similar. The lighting based on what I remember from the day is pretty much exactly in the aircrafts nose. The shadow seems to confirm that, but since much of the plane isn’t directly lit I wanted to check if that would be an issue. I was also wondering if if would be too similar to the linked photo I already have in. Same aircraft and location, but I feel like they are significantly different in content. Thanks!

          https://www.jetphotos.com/photo/10045267
          Attached Files

          Comment


          • Originally posted by Simon B View Post
            For the Stat helicopter I have a question about this photo as it pertains to back lit and similar. The lighting based on what I remember from the day is pretty much exactly in the aircrafts nose. The shadow seems to confirm that, but since much of the plane isn’t directly lit I wanted to check if that would be an issue. I was also wondering if if would be too similar to the linked photo I already have in. Same aircraft and location, but I feel like they are significantly different in content. Thanks!

            https://www.jetphotos.com/photo/10045267
            Yes backlit. Quality also not good enough for 1920pix. If different day, not similar.

            Comment


            • I’m a little worried about over processed on this one. To be honest I’ve never been quite sure where the bounds for that lie and I had to do some more heavy than usual edits to make the sky not washed out. Any feedback would be appreciated.

              Attached Files

              Comment


              • Originally posted by Simon B View Post
                I’m a little worried about over processed on this one. To be honest I’ve never been quite sure where the bounds for that lie and I had to do some more heavy than usual edits to make the sky not washed out. Any feedback would be appreciated.
                This image is soft, and yes it does look like a bit too much NR was applied.

                Comment


                • Originally posted by dlowwa View Post

                  This image is soft, and yes it does look like a bit too much NR was applied.
                  Well one thing that might help with both of these is that I accidentally exported at 1920 even though I had already figured it wouldn’t be sharp enough for that. How’s it look at 1280? I did take off a little bit of NR.
                  Attached Files

                  Comment


                  • Originally posted by Simon B View Post

                    Well one thing that might help with both of these is that I accidentally exported at 1920 even though I had already figured it wouldn’t be sharp enough for that. How’s it look at 1280? I did take off a little bit of NR.
                    Would be acceptable for me, though there is still a slight amount of NR-related compression visible.

                    Comment


                    • Originally posted by dlowwa View Post

                      Would be acceptable for me, though there is still a slight amount of NR-related compression visible.
                      Thanks. I’ll take off a touch more and see how it looks before I submit.


                      Go figure that I got only one decently sharp photo on a nice day for the first time Finnair has ever flown here and just the second for an A350. Too bad I didn’t get one good enough for 1920. Guess I cracked under the pressure a bit

                      Comment

                      Working...
                      X