Announcement

Collapse
No announcement yet.

Simon B-prescreening request

Collapse
X
 
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts

  • #16
    Originally posted by Simon B View Post
    The Alaska photo had previously been rejected for under sharpened and poor contrast, and the American for poor contrast, does it seem to be up to snuff now?

    Click image for larger version

Name:	A69DC8E9-EBF6-4EE8-9A47-4F5E9E5CCAC0.jpeg
Views:	394
Size:	516.9 KB
ID:	1079195

    Click image for larger version

Name:	63F0FFD9-274C-4A01-AE8F-A184B574BF75.jpeg
Views:	421
Size:	590.7 KB
ID:	1079194
    No, both would be rejected for same reasons again. Due to the light, these are not fixable.

    Comment


    • #17
      I re-edited these from a different day, the AA was poor contrast, and framing, and the Alaska was poor contrast.

      Click image for larger version

Name:	8573CCB2-1C99-4AC1-A15D-BB3D2EBF6658.jpeg
Views:	82
Size:	553.2 KB
ID:	1079287
      Attached Files

      Comment


      • #18
        Originally posted by Simon B View Post
        I re-edited these from a different day, the AA was poor contrast, and framing, and the Alaska was poor contrast.

        Click image for larger version

Name:	8573CCB2-1C99-4AC1-A15D-BB3D2EBF6658.jpeg
Views:	82
Size:	553.2 KB
ID:	1079287
        Both would be rejected for dark, contrast, soft, and noise.

        Comment


        • #19
          Originally posted by dlowwa View Post

          Both would be rejected for dark, contrast, soft, and noise.
          Would it be worth the effort to fix them?

          Comment


          • #20
            Originally posted by Simon B View Post

            Would it be worth the effort to fix them?
            Probably not.

            Comment


            • #21
              Originally posted by dlowwa View Post

              Probably not.
              Thank you

              Comment


              • #22
                Would this work as a wing shot? Click image for larger version

Name:	64E10FD7-173A-4A9F-8E05-1872CA98379A.jpeg
Views:	120
Size:	732.4 KB
ID:	1079334

                Comment


                • #23
                  Originally posted by Simon B View Post
                  Would this work as a wing shot? Click image for larger version

Name:	64E10FD7-173A-4A9F-8E05-1872CA98379A.jpeg
Views:	120
Size:	732.4 KB
ID:	1079334
                  With better levelling and less compression, should be workable.

                  Comment


                  • #24
                    Originally posted by dlowwa View Post

                    With better levelling and less compression, should be workable.
                    So in that case with the leveling would you want it level to the ground? Or the wing?

                    also, for gods sake, all my photos with my real camera are unsalvageable but my phone pulls it off, lol...

                    Comment


                    • #25
                      Originally posted by Simon B View Post

                      So in that case with the leveling would you want it level to the ground? Or the wing?
                      Using the actual horizon would be a good idea.

                      Comment


                      • #26
                        Originally posted by dlowwa View Post

                        Using the actual horizon would be a good idea.
                        this good?

                        Click image for larger version

Name:	8F20EE6F-3831-484D-B3E0-0F3A8FEB6F97.jpeg
Views:	60
Size:	754.7 KB
ID:	1079399
                        Attached Files

                        Comment


                        • #27
                          Originally posted by Simon B View Post

                          this good?

                          Click image for larger version

Name:	8F20EE6F-3831-484D-B3E0-0F3A8FEB6F97.jpeg
Views:	60
Size:	754.7 KB
ID:	1079399
                          Horizon looks ok; still borderline for compression.

                          Comment


                          • #28
                            how would this one fare?
                            Click image for larger version

Name:	5711E171-AABB-4000-AAE9-206EAB616386.jpeg
Views:	96
Size:	738.9 KB
ID:	1079473

                            Comment


                            • #29
                              Originally posted by Simon B View Post
                              how would this one fare?
                              Click image for larger version

Name:	5711E171-AABB-4000-AAE9-206EAB616386.jpeg
Views:	96
Size:	738.9 KB
ID:	1079473
                              Would be rejected for color, soft, and contrast.

                              Comment


                              • #30
                                This was previously rejected for under sharp, would it fare any better now? Click image for larger version

Name:	IMG_1551xx.JPG
Views:	99
Size:	605.0 KB
ID:	1080002

                                Comment

                                Working...
                                X