Announcement

Collapse
No announcement yet.

Pre-Screen / Editing Advice

Collapse
X
 
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts

  • Pre-Screen / Editing Advice

    Howdy. here's one of my recent rejections. (i got alot )
    Over Processed / Bad postprocessing
    https://www.jetphotos.com/viewqueued_b.php?id=7864925
    Screener told me it's halos.
    Can someone tell me where please? Excuse my aging eyes

  • #2
    Click image for larger version

Name:	Screen Shot 2020-02-08 at 3.21.03 PM.png
Views:	478
Size:	356.6 KB
ID:	1080366

    Equalize shows them pretty much all over the plane unfortunately.

    Comment


    • #3
      Thank you Mark.
      Original jpg also shows lots of halos around the plane. I did remove it.
      Guess i can give up on this one.

      Comment


      • #4
        Hi folks,

        Need some help to adjust the horizon level:
        https://www.jetphotos.com/viewqueued_b.php?id=8561524
        The seaplane just landed on the waterway.

        If I use the big pole in the back(red arrow) as the vertical guide line, the whole image doesn't seem right. Guess the big pole is not 90 degree vertical.
        If I use the fence line on the right(green arrows) as the reference, the image looks more like it. But this fence part gotta be cropped out anyway.

        Well..? Thanks in advance.

        Comment


        • #5
          Hi,
          Your best choice ever on such a photo is the water. No pole nor fence rods.
          Water surface is always horizontally leveled, by nature.
          This picture need a bit of clock-wise correction.
          Have a nice new day,
          Ike

          Comment


          • #6
            "Using water surface as horizontal level" is a brilliant idea.
            Will add a bit of clockwise correction as you suggested.
            Thanks a bunch. You rock
            -Jack

            Comment


            • #7
              Hi folks,

              Please have look at my recent rejection photo. It's a little embarrassing to get 3 rejected reasons
              https://www.jetphotos.com/viewqueued_b.php?id=8679719

              No problem with all 3 reasons. Just wanna know how to fix?
              • Too much or too little contrast : Is it fixable if I throw in more contrast or a little more of something stronger?
              • Horizon unlevel: Guess it needs a tiny bit of counterclockwise?
              • Categories wrong or missing: Not a clue here. Should i check cargo or ...anything?
              Thanks in advance

              -Luft Spotter

              Comment


              • #8
                Originally posted by LuftSpotter View Post
                Too much or too little contrast : Is it fixable if I throw in more contrast or a little more of something stronger?
                Not really fixable due to the poor/overcast light.

                Originally posted by LuftSpotter View Post
                Horizon unlevel: Guess it needs a tiny bit of counterclockwise?
                Yes, buildings leaning right, so CCW needed.

                Originally posted by LuftSpotter View Post
                Categories wrong or missing: Not a clue here. Should i check cargo or ...anything?
                This is not a Night Shot, as you selected.

                Comment


                • #9
                  Originally posted by dlowwa View Post

                  Not really fixable due to the poor/overcast light.



                  Yes, buildings leaning right, so CCW needed.



                  This is not a Night Shot, as you selected.
                  Thank you so much for letting me know Dana

                  Can't believe i clicked the "Night Shot"

                  Comment


                  • #10
                    Hi all,

                    Are these "similar"?
                    https://www.jetphotos.com/viewqueued_b.php?id=9858854
                    and
                    https://www.jetphotos.com/photo/9982722
                    same reg# and airport.

                    Comment


                    • #11
                      Originally posted by LuftSpotter View Post
                      Hello, please read here when you get the chance:

                      https://forums.jetphotos.com/forum/a...ning-from-crew

                      2. Prescreening is offered only for images not in the queue currently. Please ask for advice/prescreening before submitting the images to the queue

                      Comment


                      • #12
                        My bad. Noobies mistake
                        Allow me to try again. Are these similar?
                        https://www.jetphotos.com/photo/9982722
                        and the attached image
                        Attached Files

                        Comment


                        • #13
                          Originally posted by LuftSpotter View Post
                          My bad. Noobies mistake
                          Allow me to try again. Are these similar?
                          https://www.jetphotos.com/photo/9982722
                          and the attached image
                          Technically similar yes, but you may get some leeway due to the different seasons - couldn't promise though.

                          Comment


                          • #14
                            Technically similar yes, but you may get some leeway due to the different seasons - couldn't promise though.
                            Sounds good to me chief. Let's give up on this one. It's not a Junkers 52 anyways
                            Thank you for your time

                            Comment


                            • #15
                              Howdy,

                              Would you like to take a look at my oversharpen rejection :
                              https://www.jetphotos.com/viewqueued_b.php?id=9838079
                              All I did is +25 sharpening in Lightroom as in attached image.
                              May I also ask if it is the aircraft or the snow backdrops or both oversharpening? I'm afraid if i remove the +25 sharpening, i may get the rejection for undersharpen
                              Attached Files

                              Comment

                              Working...
                              X