Pre-Screen / Editing Advice

[LuftSpotter]

Howdy. here's one of my recent rejections. (i got alot )
Over Processed / Bad postprocessing
https://www.jetphotos.com/viewqueued_b.php?id=7864925
Screener told me it's halos.
Can someone tell me where please? Excuse my aging eyes

[MarkLawrence]

Equalize shows them pretty much all over the plane unfortunately.

[LuftSpotter]

Thank you Mark.
Original jpg also shows lots of halos around the plane. I did remove it.
Guess i can give up on this one.

[LuftSpotter]

Hi folks,

Need some help to adjust the horizon level:
https://www.jetphotos.com/viewqueued_b.php?id=8561524
The seaplane just landed on the waterway.

If I use the big pole in the back(red arrow) as the vertical guide line, the whole image doesn't seem right. Guess the big pole is not 90 degree vertical.
If I use the fence line on the right(green arrows) as the reference, the image looks more like it. But this fence part gotta be cropped out anyway.

Well..? Thanks in advance.

[ikeharel]

Hi,
Your best choice ever on such a photo is the water. No pole nor fence rods.
Water surface is always horizontally leveled, by nature.
This picture need a bit of clock-wise correction.
Have a nice new day,
Ike

[LuftSpotter]

"Using water surface as horizontal level" is a brilliant idea.
Will add a bit of clockwise correction as you suggested.
Thanks a bunch. You rock
-Jack

[LuftSpotter]

Hi folks,

Please have look at my recent rejection photo. It's a little embarrassing to get 3 rejected reasons
https://www.jetphotos.com/viewqueued_b.php?id=8679719

No problem with all 3 reasons. Just wanna know how to fix?

• Too much or too little contrast : Is it fixable if I throw in more contrast or a little more of something stronger?
• Horizon unlevel: Guess it needs a tiny bit of counterclockwise?
• Categories wrong or missing: Not a clue here. Should i check cargo or ...anything?

Thanks in advance

-Luft Spotter

[dlowwa]

Too much or too little contrast : Is it fixable if I throw in more contrast or a little more of something stronger?

Not really fixable due to the poor/overcast light.

Horizon unlevel: Guess it needs a tiny bit of counterclockwise?

Yes, buildings leaning right, so CCW needed.

Categories wrong or missing: Not a clue here. Should i check cargo or ...anything?

This is not a Night Shot, as you selected.

[LuftSpotter]

Not really fixable due to the poor/overcast light.



Yes, buildings leaning right, so CCW needed.



This is not a Night Shot, as you selected.

Thank you so much for letting me know Dana

Can't believe i clicked the "Night Shot"

[LuftSpotter]

Hi all,

Are these "similar"?
https://www.jetphotos.com/viewqueued_b.php?id=9858854
and
https://www.jetphotos.com/photo/9982722
same reg# and airport.

[dlowwa]

Hi all,

Are these "similar"?
https://www.jetphotos.com/viewqueued_b.php?id=9858854
and
https://www.jetphotos.com/photo/9982722
same reg# and airport.

Hello, please read here when you get the chance:

https://forums.jetphotos.com/forum/a...ning-from-crew

2. Prescreening is offered only for images not in the queue currently. Please ask for advice/prescreening before submitting the images to the queue

[LuftSpotter]

My bad. Noobies mistake
Allow me to try again. Are these similar?
https://www.jetphotos.com/photo/9982722
and the attached image

[dlowwa]

My bad. Noobies mistake
Allow me to try again. Are these similar?
https://www.jetphotos.com/photo/9982722
and the attached image

Technically similar yes, but you may get some leeway due to the different seasons - couldn't promise though.

[LuftSpotter]

Technically similar yes, but you may get some leeway due to the different seasons - couldn't promise though.

Sounds good to me chief. Let's give up on this one. It's not a Junkers 52 anyways
Thank you for your time

[LuftSpotter]

Howdy,

Would you like to take a look at my oversharpen rejection :
https://www.jetphotos.com/viewqueued_b.php?id=9838079
All I did is +25 sharpening in Lightroom as in attached image.
May I also ask if it is the aircraft or the snow backdrops or both oversharpening? I'm afraid if i remove the +25 sharpening, i may get the rejection for undersharpen