If this is your first visit, be sure to
check out the FAQ by clicking the
link above. You may have to register
before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages,
select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below.
Hello, long time no see.
I would like to consult this question: can these photos be accepted, if not, is there any possibility of repair, thank you
#1 has a contrast problem, side of fuselage is not well lit whilst the top seems overexposed
#2 seems acceptable
#3 front has a bit overexposure, but seems acceptable. you might consider to crop it slightly tighter (or wider) because the horizontal stab is now cut in half
#4 looks backlit/contrast problem, unfixable imo
#1 has a contrast problem, side of fuselage is not well lit whilst the top seems overexposed
#2 seems acceptable
#3 front has a bit overexposure, but seems acceptable. you might consider to crop it slightly tighter (or wider) because the horizontal stab is now cut in half
#4 looks backlit/contrast problem, unfixable imo
thank you for your reply:
For #3: I use the 16:9 cropping format, would it be more reasonable if I used 16:10?
Hello, these are photos taken in a new city (Chengdu). I would like to ask if these photos can be accepted. If not, is there any room for adjustment, thank you.
Will the color of the city sky affect the possibility of acceptance of the picture, such as the A350 from China Southern? What if the airplane is relatively small and hasn't taken pictures of the sky for ARJ?
Can this Disney be accepted?
And these two
If not, can you give some suggestions for modification? Thank you
Hello, these are photos taken in a new city (Chengdu). I would like to ask if these photos can be accepted. If not, is there any room for adjustment, thank you.
Will the color of the city sky affect the possibility of acceptance of the picture, such as the A350 from China Southern? What if the airplane is relatively small and hasn't taken pictures of the sky for ARJ?
Can this Disney be accepted?
And these two
If not, can you give some suggestions for modification? Thank you
1-2 borderline centering (too high)
3-4 contrast. not fixable.
Hello i'm here again
This is a photo taken at the new airport, can help me see if it can be accepted (these are some representative pictures), thank you, thank you for your reply.
Hello i'm here again
This is a photo taken at the new airport, can help me see if it can be accepted (these are some representative pictures), thank you, thank you for your reply.
A little bit of noise visible, but should be acceptable; heat haze also noticeable on #3.
Long time no see. First of all, thank you for your guidance.
Now I have two questions for the airport, what specific category does the first picture fall into? Can the second photo be submitted according to the shooting location?
Long time no see. First of all, thank you for your guidance.
Now I have two questions for the airport, what specific category does the first picture fall into? Can the second photo be submitted according to the shooting location?
Both would be motive rejections. A photo of an empty ramp/jetbridges is not acceptable. 'Spotting Location' can only be used for images accessible to the public at all times.
How to determine the level of the horizon (which direction should the graph rotate?) Also, I don't know the reason for the category error (I posted the information below).
We process personal data about users of our site, through the use of cookies and other technologies, to deliver our services, personalize advertising, and to analyze site activity. We may share certain information about our users with our advertising and analytics partners. For additional details, refer to our Privacy Policy.
By clicking "I AGREE" below, you agree to our Privacy Policy and our personal data processing and cookie practices as described therein. You also acknowledge that this forum may be hosted outside your country and you consent to the collection, storage, and processing of your data in the country where this forum is hosted.
Comment