Announcement

Collapse
No announcement yet.

LingFeng - Prescreening / Editing Advice

Collapse
X
 
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts

  • In response to yesterday's answer, I made a revision, the result is 1-3, are these better?
    1: Adjust the color temperature to make it more realistic
    2: I did my best
    3: I am not sure if there is a bit of dirt in the lower left corner, I have removed it. As for the play, I split it evenly
    Click image for larger version

Name:	5226-4469.jpg
Views:	53
Size:	423.0 KB
ID:	1117547Click image for larger version

Name:	30AL-5740.jpg
Views:	47
Size:	486.0 KB
ID:	1117548Click image for larger version

Name:	6365-4649.jpg
Views:	49
Size:	552.1 KB
ID:	1117549
    4-5 is new, could you please help me to have a look? These are not certain, I hope to be able to get important guidance. Click image for larger version

Name:	5949-5642.jpg
Views:	52
Size:	445.5 KB
ID:	1117550Click image for larger version

Name:	306N-5585.jpg
Views:	50
Size:	509.3 KB
ID:	1117551

    Comment


    • Originally posted by LingFeng View Post
      In response to yesterday's answer, I made a revision, the result is 1-3, are these better?
      1. borderline contrast (but ok for me)
      2. contrast
      3. ok for me
      4-5. contrast

      Comment


      • Originally posted by dlowwa View Post

        1. borderline contrast (but ok for me)
        2. contrast
        3. ok for me
        4-5. contrast
        What about these pictures?
        1: I have adjusted it. Is the contrast now higher or lower?
        2-4: the contrast is not easy to grasp. It's different from the dirty and horizon treatment Click image for larger version

Name:	5949-5642.jpg
Views:	53
Size:	448.0 KB
ID:	1117604Click image for larger version

Name:	1323-4908.jpg
Views:	51
Size:	539.7 KB
ID:	1117605Click image for larger version

Name:	308E-4443.jpg
Views:	50
Size:	461.0 KB
ID:	1117606Click image for larger version

Name:	5967-4801.jpg
Views:	51
Size:	484.1 KB
ID:	1117607

        Comment


        • Originally posted by LingFeng View Post

          What about these pictures?
          1: I have adjusted it. Is the contrast now higher or lower?
          2-4: the contrast is not easy to grasp. It's different from the dirty and horizon treatment
          1. contrast
          2. borderline dark
          3. color, centering
          4. borderline soft/contrast

          Comment


          • For the third one yesterday, isn't this a better one?
            These three are from a few years ago and look uncertain. The last one has been rejected several times and I have recalibrated it now Click image for larger version

Name:	308E-4443.jpg
Views:	50
Size:	468.7 KB
ID:	1117664Click image for larger version

Name:	5248-6978.jpg
Views:	49
Size:	687.2 KB
ID:	1117665Click image for larger version

Name:	2677-5916.jpg
Views:	48
Size:	830.8 KB
ID:	1117666Click image for larger version

Name:	301D-1156.jpg
Views:	46
Size:	613.1 KB
ID:	1117667

            Comment


            • Originally posted by LingFeng View Post
              For the third one yesterday, isn't this a better one?
              These three are from a few years ago and look uncertain. The last one has been rejected several times and I have recalibrated it now
              1. too far. better 4x3.
              2. soft, horizon
              3. borderline horizon (CCW)
              4. borderline contrast

              Comment


              • Could you help me to pre-screen these pictures? Thank you (Is the B-301D any better than the last one?)Click image for larger version

Name:	301D-9767.jpg
Views:	45
Size:	875.6 KB
ID:	1117760Click image for larger version

Name:	306N-0794.jpg
Views:	46
Size:	815.9 KB
ID:	1117761Click image for larger version

Name:	30C0-7397.jpg
Views:	42
Size:	895.2 KB
ID:	1117762

                Comment


                • Originally posted by LingFeng View Post
                  Could you help me to pre-screen these pictures? Thank you
                  1. borderline contrast. horizon is deceiving, but I think ok for me
                  2. borderline contrast/centering
                  3. contrast, centering

                  Comment


                  • Hello, thanks for your hard work. Regarding these:
                    1: The picture is modified by Horizon. I am not sure what "Horizon is deceiving" is.
                    2: The whole is closer to the center, is that OK?
                    3. I was rejected once a month ago, but I could not remember the specific reasons, so I made a readjustment and hoped to have a preliminary examination.
                    4: the reason: Too much noise or grain, https://www.jetphotos.com/viewqueued_b.php?id=9193033, better now? I hope I can learn it
                    5: I hope to do a preliminary examination, do I need to add the option of night photography Click image for larger version

Name:	301D-9767.jpg
Views:	42
Size:	873.5 KB
ID:	1117824Click image for larger version

Name:	306N-0794.jpg
Views:	41
Size:	811.3 KB
ID:	1117825Click image for larger version

Name:	20AW-3534.jpg
Views:	38
Size:	703.5 KB
ID:	1117826Click image for larger version

Name:	N332UP-6499.jpg
Views:	40
Size:	735.8 KB
ID:	1117827Click image for larger version

Name:	N2639U-6754.jpg
Views:	41
Size:	780.4 KB
ID:	1117828

                    Comment


                    • Originally posted by LingFeng View Post
                      Hello, thanks for your hard work. Regarding these:
                      1-2 borderline contrast. will not comment on these again.
                      3. soft
                      4. soft/blurry, too far, noisy
                      5. borderline dark/contrast. yes night shot.

                      Comment


                      • #236 is useless
                        Aimed at the wrong photo: https://www.jetphotos.com/viewqueued_b.php?id=9208800, there are a few questions
                        1. Bad Composition (Bad Framing/Aircraft Not Centered) : Is the body of the plane (not including the tail fin) locked in the center of the picture in general
                        2. Dark/Underexposed: Modified
                        3. Categories wrong or missing: Does the original image need to add the night shooting option, but the third image doesn't?
                        4. Vignetting is not allowed: I have checked this carefully but did not find it. I hope I can check the method, thank you
                        Pictures one and two are wrong pictures
                        Picture 3 is my modified picture. I hope it can be pre-examined again. Thank you Click image for larger version

Name:	17260_1622986669.jpg
Views:	42
Size:	611.5 KB
ID:	1118038Click image for larger version

Name:	截屏2021-06-20 下午5.19.41.png
Views:	29
Size:	171.8 KB
ID:	1118039Click image for larger version

Name:	8148-0507.jpg
Views:	29
Size:	585.3 KB
ID:	1118040

                        Comment


                        • Originally posted by LingFeng View Post
                          Picture 3 is my modified picture. I hope it can be pre-examined again. Thank you[ATTACH=JSON]
                          This would be rejected for soft, contrast, and centering. Category is Special Scheme.

                          Comment


                          • I hope it can be pre-checked. Since the queue is full, I would like to ask whether I should choose Airport Overview or Terminal for this one. Click image for larger version

Name:	IMG_9196.jpg
Views:	37
Size:	681.7 KB
ID:	1118110

                            Comment


                            • Originally posted by LingFeng View Post
                              I hope it can be pre-checked. Since the queue is full, I would like to ask whether I should choose Airport Overview or Terminal for this one. Click image for larger version

Name:	IMG_9196.jpg
Views:	37
Size:	681.7 KB
ID:	1118110
                              Would be rejected for soft/noise/motive.

                              Comment


                              • hello,Can this photo be adopted as a cabin theme ?(this interior decoration is specially provided today) Click image for larger version

Name:	1107.jpg
Views:	23
Size:	623.0 KB
ID:	1118609

                                Comment

                                Working...
                                X