Announcement

Collapse
No announcement yet.

LingFeng - Prescreening / Editing Advice

Collapse
X
 
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts

  • Originally posted by LingFeng View Post
    I’m not sure whether this photo makes the horizon level,I hope I can get your help, thank you Click image for larger version

Name:	5916-1073.jpg
Views:	69
Size:	833.7 KB
ID:	1120830
    Close to acceptable, but I would probably give it a little CCW.

    Comment


    • Can you give some guidance for night photography? Thank you Click image for larger version

Name:	308M.jpg
Views:	55
Size:	540.1 KB
ID:	1121018Click image for larger version

Name:	6512-1341.jpg
Views:	50
Size:	543.2 KB
ID:	1121019Click image for larger version

Name:	oe-lpe-1356.jpg
Views:	51
Size:	562.6 KB
ID:	1121020

      Comment


      • Originally posted by LingFeng View Post
        Can you give some guidance for night photography? Thank you Click image for larger version

Name:	308M.jpg
Views:	55
Size:	540.1 KB
ID:	1121018Click image for larger version

Name:	6512-1341.jpg
Views:	50
Size:	543.2 KB
ID:	1121019Click image for larger version

Name:	oe-lpe-1356.jpg
Views:	51
Size:	562.6 KB
ID:	1121020
        Last two a bit oversharpened, but should be close enough to acceptable for all three.

        Comment


        • Hello, this is the photo optimized in LR recently. I hope to get your guidance
          Among them:
          2. Is the heat radiation reaching the permissible level
          3. The image before been rejected (https://www.jetphotos.com/viewqueued_b.php?id=9359611), the reason is that "Too much or Too little contrast" and "Bad Info" two; I chose the "control Tower" option. I lowered the contrast of the image. Is this adjustment reasonable now
          Click image for larger version

Name:	7326-5130.jpg
Views:	45
Size:	478.3 KB
ID:	1121529Click image for larger version

Name:	1808-5737.jpg
Views:	40
Size:	789.0 KB
ID:	1121530Click image for larger version

Name:	ZGCJ-9976.jpg
Views:	40
Size:	635.5 KB
ID:	1121531Click image for larger version

Name:	1356-8245.jpg
Views:	40
Size:	807.5 KB
ID:	1121532Click image for larger version

Name:	5929-9009.jpg
Views:	39
Size:	842.9 KB
ID:	1121533

          Comment


          • Originally posted by LingFeng View Post
            Hello, this is the photo optimized in LR recently. I hope to get your guidance
            Among them:
            2. Is the heat radiation reaching the permissible level
            3. The image before been rejected (https://www.jetphotos.com/viewqueued_b.php?id=9359611), the reason is that "Too much or Too little contrast" and "Bad Info" two; I chose the "control Tower" option. I lowered the contrast of the image. Is this adjustment reasonable now
            1. contrast, noise, overprocessed
            2. heat haze
            3-4. contrast. 3 is not a view of the tower, but of the whole terminal.
            5. horizon, borderline contrast

            Comment


            • Some questions about hot photos and general aviation:
              I'd really like you to do some pre-reviews for me. These images are all potential hot for Jetphotos. The first time I uploaded general aviation, the "Categories wrong or missing" was rejected. I am not sure whether I need to add additional options (related webpage links: https://www.jetphotos.com/viewqueued_b.php?id=9427956). Click image for larger version

Name:	0415-7336.jpg
Views:	36
Size:	547.0 KB
ID:	1122350Click image for larger version

Name:	9297-7205.jpg
Views:	31
Size:	789.2 KB
ID:	1122351Click image for larger version

Name:	9418-7240.jpg
Views:	34
Size:	738.7 KB
ID:	1122352

              Comment


              • Small prop is missing I'm sure.

                Comment


                • Originally posted by LingFeng View Post
                  Some questions about hot photos and general aviation:
                  I'd really like you to do some pre-reviews for me. These images are all potential hot for Jetphotos. The first time I uploaded general aviation, the "Categories wrong or missing" was rejected. I am not sure whether I need to add additional options (related webpage links: https://www.jetphotos.com/viewqueued_b.php?id=9427956).
                  1. blurry/soft. not fixable.
                  2. soft
                  3. soft

                  Indeed, Small Prop category was missing.

                  Comment


                  • Originally posted by MarkLawrence View Post
                    Small prop is missing I'm sure.
                    thanks

                    Comment


                    • hi,I would like to ask for suggestions for amendments again:
                      1: I have been rejected because of the center, but I think it is reasonable and want to get more effective guidance
                      2: Can it be accepted for screener?(not sure wether I need to choose night shot) Click image for larger version

Name:	8235-1346.jpg
Views:	21
Size:	502.2 KB
ID:	1124045Click image for larger version

Name:	8569-3863.jpg
Views:	15
Size:	525.8 KB
ID:	1124046

                      Comment


                      • Originally posted by LingFeng View Post
                        hi,I would like to ask for suggestions for amendments again:
                        1: I have been rejected because of the center, but I think it is reasonable and want to get more effective guidance
                        2: Can it be accepted for screener?(not sure wether I need to choose night shot)
                        1. centering (too high)
                        2. borderline contrast/centering (too low). yes night shot.

                        Comment

                        Working...
                        X