Announcement

Collapse
No announcement yet.

James Dinsdale - Pre-Screening/Editing Advice

Collapse
X
 
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts

  • JamesDC152
    replied
    Originally posted by dlowwa View Post

    Click image for larger version

Name:	96018_1609778278.jpg
Views:	26
Size:	455.1 KB
ID:	1106755
    Thank you! I was looking at the sky more as that has caused past spot rejections

    Leave a comment:


  • dlowwa
    replied
    Originally posted by JamesDC152 View Post
    Morning chaps,

    I had this rejected due to dust spots, but I am struggling to find where, could someone assist me so I can edit it out and re-upload?

    https://www.jetphotos.com/viewqueued_b.php?id=8774570

    Cheers!
    Click image for larger version

Name:	96018_1609778278.jpg
Views:	26
Size:	455.1 KB
ID:	1106755

    Leave a comment:


  • JamesDC152
    replied
    Morning chaps,

    I had this rejected due to dust spots, but I am struggling to find where, could someone assist me so I can edit it out and re-upload?

    https://www.jetphotos.com/viewqueued_b.php?id=8774570

    Cheers!

    Leave a comment:


  • dlowwa
    replied
    Originally posted by JamesDC152 View Post
    Afternoon,

    Would this photo be accepted as a night photo? It is the Air France aircraft receiving a water cannon salute prior to its final departure from Tegel
    Night shot, yes, but be aware there are multiple quality issues present.

    Leave a comment:


  • JamesDC152
    replied
    Afternoon,

    Would this photo be accepted as a night photo? It is the Air France aircraft receiving a water cannon salute prior to its final departure from Tegel
    Attached Files

    Leave a comment:


  • dlowwa
    replied
    Originally posted by JamesDC152 View Post
    Evening, thoughts on these photos if possible.

    Cheers!
    Poor contrast on all; 3-4 similar.

    Leave a comment:


  • JamesDC152
    replied
    Evening, thoughts on these photos if possible.

    Cheers!
    Attached Files

    Leave a comment:


  • dlowwa
    replied
    Originally posted by JamesDC152 View Post

    I've asked for editing advice, rather than an appeal.
    I realize that, but as stated here:

    https://forums.jetphotos.com/forum/a...ning-from-crew

    we ask that you ask for advice before appealing. Otherwise we then need to spend twice as much time dealing with the image. If you had asked for help before, I could have told you the image is not fixable and not worth appealing, but now I need to take the time to do so, and the person who dealt with your appeal had to spend that time too. If you're so certain that you are correct that you want to appeal before asking for advice, great, do it. But don't then expect to come back to the forum to ask for the advice you decided you didn't need if/when your appeal is rejected.

    Leave a comment:


  • iad.spotter
    replied
    Originally posted by JamesDC152 View Post
    Evening all

    I had this photo rejected and subsequent appeal the screener said "weather may be the culprit for the lack of contrast but not a reason to accept the photo" - my question is whether this photo is editable to a suitable quality for acceptance and what would you amend ? https://www.jetphotos.com/viewqueued_b.php?id=8570076

    Surely the historic occasion of the photo and aircraft should trump the small reason to not accept it, especially if its not a million miles away to what a more acceptable photo would be in the perfect weather conditions. As I feel the histogram indicates a suitable level of contrast, what else can be done?
    The contrast doesn't seem suitable for the DB, not mentioning the fact that it is also soft. Probably one for the personal collection.

    Leave a comment:


  • JamesDC152
    replied
    Originally posted by dlowwa View Post

    Image has already been appealed, and comments left.
    I've asked for editing advice, rather than an appeal.

    Leave a comment:


  • dlowwa
    replied
    Originally posted by JamesDC152 View Post
    Evening all

    I had this photo rejected and subsequent appeal the screener said "weather may be the culprit for the lack of contrast but not a reason to accept the photo" - my question is whether this photo is editable to a suitable quality for acceptance and what would you amend ? https://www.jetphotos.com/viewqueued_b.php?id=8570076

    Surely the historic occasion of the photo and aircraft should trump the small reason to not accept it, especially if its not a million miles away to what a more acceptable photo would be in the perfect weather conditions. As I feel the histogram indicates a suitable level of contrast, what else can be done?
    Image has already been appealed, and comments left.

    Leave a comment:


  • JamesDC152
    replied
    Evening all

    I had this photo rejected and subsequent appeal the screener said "weather may be the culprit for the lack of contrast but not a reason to accept the photo" - my question is whether this photo is editable to a suitable quality for acceptance and what would you amend ? https://www.jetphotos.com/viewqueued_b.php?id=8570076

    Surely the historic occasion of the photo and aircraft should trump the small reason to not accept it, especially if its not a million miles away to what a more acceptable photo would be in the perfect weather conditions. As I feel the histogram indicates a suitable level of contrast, what else can be done?
    Attached Files

    Leave a comment:


  • dlowwa
    replied
    Originally posted by JamesDC152 View Post
    Evening,

    I had this photo rejected for horizon unlevel, as it was my first wing view shot (I think) I wasn't sure which datum to use for the horizon, especially when the aircraft was banking. What would the screener had judged this by? https://www.jetphotos.com/viewqueued_b.php?id=8538209

    Cheers
    Judged by the fact that all the buildings are leaning to the right.

    Leave a comment:


  • JamesDC152
    replied
    Evening,

    I had this photo rejected for horizon unlevel, as it was my first wing view shot (I think) I wasn't sure which datum to use for the horizon, especially when the aircraft was banking. What would the screener had judged this by? https://www.jetphotos.com/viewqueued_b.php?id=8538209

    Cheers

    Leave a comment:


  • LX-A343
    replied
    Originally posted by JamesDC152 View Post
    Would this be suitable for a Spotting Location photograph?
    Nope, does not meet the requirements for photos of Spotting Locations.

    Leave a comment:

Working...
X