Announcement

Collapse
No announcement yet.

Rainsmains - Prescreening Request/Editing Advice

Collapse
X
 
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts

  • #46
    Originally posted by Rainsmains View Post

    Is this much better? Im too wary of overdoing it.
    Don't see much difference between this and the previous.

    Originally posted by Rainsmains View Post
    Could I get a prescreen for this image? Thank you!
    A bit soft and needing CW rotation.

    Comment


    • #47
      Originally posted by dlowwa View Post
      Don't see much difference between this and the previous.
      .
      Had abit more blues (+1) to compensate for the yellow cast, together with a tad of sharpening.

      Comment


      • #48
        Would this be an improvement? Just to clarify, for ground shots (like in this case), could i take reference to the plane as the top of the fuselage? Click image for larger version

Name:	PC306484-3.jpg
Views:	76
Size:	541.2 KB
ID:	1089372

        Comment


        • #49
          Originally posted by Rainsmains View Post
          Would this be an improvement?
          Still borderline for horizon.

          Originally posted by Rainsmains View Post
          Just to clarify, for ground shots (like in this case), could i take reference to the plane as the top of the fuselage?
          Not at all a good reference. The horizon first, and if not visible, then background verticals towards the center.

          Comment


          • #50
            Originally posted by dlowwa View Post
            Still borderline for horizon.
            Would this be better? Click image for larger version

Name:	PC306484-4.jpg
Views:	69
Size:	541.9 KB
ID:	1089376

            Comment


            • #51
              Originally posted by Rainsmains View Post

              Would this be better?
              No, worse.

              Comment


              • #52
                Is this better? Sorry about the previous problems, kinda bad when it comes to these kinda situations for cropClick image for larger version

Name:	PC306484-5.jpg
Views:	75
Size:	541.0 KB
ID:	1089390

                Comment


                • #53
                  Originally posted by Rainsmains View Post
                  Is this better? Sorry about the previous problems, kinda bad when it comes to these kinda situations for cropClick image for larger version

Name:	PC306484-5.jpg
Views:	75
Size:	541.0 KB
ID:	1089390
                  Probably good enough now.

                  Comment


                  • #54
                    Could I get a pre-screen for these 2 images? Thank You! Click image for larger version

Name:	PC192071.jpg
Views:	63
Size:	521.6 KB
ID:	1089462Click image for larger version

Name:	P1018728.jpg
Views:	59
Size:	399.2 KB
ID:	1089463

                    Comment


                    • #55
                      Originally posted by Rainsmains View Post
                      Could I get a pre-screen for these 2 images? Thank You!
                      1. soft, compression, borderline color
                      2. ok for me

                      Comment


                      • #56
                        Could I get a prescreen for this picture?

                        Click image for larger version

Name:	DSC_0463 (2).jpg
Views:	79
Size:	385.1 KB
ID:	1089498

                        Comment


                        • #57
                          Both images are soft.

                          Comment


                          • #58
                            Would this be better? I tried to further sharpened it and dehazed it a little to try to remove the 'softness'Click image for larger version

Name:	DSC_0463 (2)-3.jpg
Views:	74
Size:	409.3 KB
ID:	1089551

                            Comment


                            • #59
                              Could i get a pre-screen for this photo? Thank you!

                              Click image for larger version

Name:	DSC_0483.jpg
Views:	67
Size:	397.6 KB
ID:	1089560

                              Comment


                              • #60
                                Originally posted by Rainsmains View Post
                                Would this be better? I tried to further sharpened it and dehazed it a little to try to remove the 'softness'Click image for larger version

Name:	DSC_0463 (2)-3.jpg
Views:	74
Size:	409.3 KB
ID:	1089551
                                Improved from definite rejection to possible rejection (borderline) for soft. Also notice some vignetting on right side, but that was there in the first version as well.

                                Originally posted by Rainsmains View Post
                                Could i get a pre-screen for this photo? Thank you!
                                Would be rejected for soft, contrast, overexposed, vignetting, and horizon.

                                Comment

                                Working...
                                X