Announcement

Collapse
No announcement yet.

Hayes Barton - Pre-screening request

Collapse
X
 
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts

  • #46
    Originally posted by dlowwa View Post

    1. borderline heat haze
    2. oversharpened, horizon (CW)
    3. borderline heat haze
    4. contrast. not fixable
    5. heat haze, overprocessed
    P2,I canceled all sharpening edits and made a little clockwise adjustment. Do you think it's suitable?

    Click image for larger version

Name:	DSC_5478.jpg
Views:	85
Size:	471.6 KB
ID:	1090999

    Comment


    • #47
      Originally posted by Hayes Barton View Post

      P2,I canceled all sharpening edits and made a little clockwise adjustment. Do you think it's suitable?

      Click image for larger version

Name:	DSC_5478.jpg
Views:	85
Size:	471.6 KB
ID:	1090999
      Should have a decent chance.

      Comment


      • #48
        Some new photos, hope to get editor's advice.Thanks a lot.

        Click image for larger version

Name:	DSC_2015.jpg
Views:	79
Size:	515.1 KB
ID:	1091036

        Click image for larger version

Name:	DSC_5602.jpg
Views:	76
Size:	706.8 KB
ID:	1091037

        Click image for larger version

Name:	DSC_5442.jpg
Views:	75
Size:	690.6 KB
ID:	1091038

        Click image for larger version

Name:	DSC_5468.jpg
Views:	75
Size:	734.8 KB
ID:	1091039

        Click image for larger version

Name:	DSC_5420.jpg
Views:	87
Size:	878.1 KB
ID:	1091040

        Comment


        • #49
          Originally posted by Hayes Barton View Post
          Some new photos, hope to get editor's advice.Thanks a lot.
          Some softness/heat haze on #2, but otherwise they would be ok for me.

          Comment


          • #50
            Originally posted by dlowwa View Post

            Some softness/heat haze on #2, but otherwise they would be ok for me.
            Thank you very much. I edited five more today.
            All from the same angle.

            Click image for larger version

Name:	DSC_5567.jpg
Views:	76
Size:	583.2 KB
ID:	1091128

            Click image for larger version

Name:	DSC_5641.jpg
Views:	66
Size:	482.7 KB
ID:	1091129

            Click image for larger version

Name:	DSC_5608.jpg
Views:	69
Size:	489.3 KB
ID:	1091130

            Click image for larger version

Name:	DSC_5648.jpg
Views:	67
Size:	648.0 KB
ID:	1091131

            Click image for larger version

Name:	DSC_5629.jpg
Views:	68
Size:	535.0 KB
ID:	1091132

            Comment


            • #51
              Originally posted by Hayes Barton View Post

              Thank you very much. I edited five more today.
              All from the same angle.
              Please read here when you get the chance, especially #3 in the original post, and then my follow up post:

              "It is not meant to be a process where you post the maximum number of requests you can, wait the minimum 24 hours, then post the maximum again, and repeat. I see more than a few guys doing this, and it shows me that they are not really making any effort to learn from the process but rather are simply taking advantage of free screening. If you've taken 10+ images in similar conditions, there is no need to post all of them for feedback. One or two will do, and you can then apply that feedback to the rest."

              https://forums.jetphotos.com/forum/a...ning-from-crew

              Comment


              • #52
                Originally posted by dlowwa View Post

                Please read here when you get the chance, especially #3 in the original post, and then my follow up post:

                "It is not meant to be a process where you post the maximum number of requests you can, wait the minimum 24 hours, then post the maximum again, and repeat. I see more than a few guys doing this, and it shows me that they are not really making any effort to learn from the process but rather are simply taking advantage of free screening. If you've taken 10+ images in similar conditions, there is no need to post all of them for feedback. One or two will do, and you can then apply that feedback to the rest."

                https://forums.jetphotos.com/forum/a...ning-from-crew



                I'm so sorry. I've read the suggestions in your post carefully. I won't upload every photo for prescreening in the future. I will only upload uncertain images for the purpose of learning.

                The following two photos were taken in the outdoor environment with a temperature of 30 ℃. I am only 150 meters away from the plane, but the heat haze seems inevitable. I am not sure whether they can be accepted, and how to avoid the heat haze? Besides, are there any other editorial suggestions?

                Thank you again for your help.




                Click image for larger version

Name:	DSC_6621.jpg
Views:	67
Size:	608.3 KB
ID:	1091242

                Click image for larger version

Name:	DSC_6544.jpg
Views:	59
Size:	504.5 KB
ID:	1091243

                Comment


                • #53
                  Originally posted by Hayes Barton View Post

                  The following two photos were taken in the outdoor environment with a temperature of 30 ℃. I am only 150 meters away from the plane, but the heat haze seems inevitable. I am not sure whether they can be accepted, and how to avoid the heat haze? Besides, are there any other editorial suggestions?

                  Thank you again for your help.

                  Click image for larger version

Name:	DSC_6621.jpg
Views:	67
Size:	608.3 KB
ID:	1091242

                  Click image for larger version

Name:	DSC_6544.jpg
Views:	59
Size:	504.5 KB
ID:	1091243
                  Don't think haze is too much of a problem for these images, though there are some halos on the second.

                  Heat haze, despite its name, is not so much a product of high temperatures as it is the difference between temperatures in different layers of the air, so you can see it on cold days too, if there is a large enough difference in temperature.

                  Comment


                  • #54
                    Originally posted by dlowwa View Post

                    Don't think haze is too much of a problem for these images, though there are some halos on the second.

                    Heat haze, despite its name, is not so much a product of high temperatures as it is the difference between temperatures in different layers of the air, so you can see it on cold days too, if there is a large enough difference in temperature.

                    I noticed that the sky in the upper left corner of this picture is darker than that in the upper right corner. I'm not sure if there is vignette. I need your opinion.Any editor's opinion is welcome.


                    Click image for larger version

Name:	DSC_6117.jpg
Views:	62
Size:	505.8 KB
ID:	1091407

                    Comment


                    • #55
                      Originally posted by Hayes Barton View Post


                      I noticed that the sky in the upper left corner of this picture is darker than that in the upper right corner. I'm not sure if there is vignette. I need your opinion.Any editor's opinion is welcome.


                      Click image for larger version

Name:	DSC_6117.jpg
Views:	62
Size:	505.8 KB
ID:	1091407
                      A touch soft, but would be ok for me.

                      Comment


                      • #56
                        Is the fuselage overexposed?

                        Click image for larger version

Name:	DSC_7189.jpg
Views:	52
Size:	614.8 KB
ID:	1091494

                        Comment


                        • #57
                          Originally posted by Hayes Barton View Post
                          Is the fuselage overexposed?

                          Click image for larger version

Name:	DSC_7189.jpg
Views:	52
Size:	614.8 KB
ID:	1091494
                          Slightly oversharpened, but exposure should be acceptable.

                          Comment


                          • #58
                            Originally posted by dlowwa View Post

                            Slightly oversharpened, but exposure should be acceptable.
                            Thank you,exposure scale mastered, but I still can't master sharpening. Is there an over sharpening problem in these two pictures? I want to know how the photo screener looks at the sharpness.

                            Click image for larger version

Name:	image_32498.jpg
Views:	54
Size:	687.3 KB
ID:	1091563

                            Click image for larger version

Name:	image_32499.jpg
Views:	48
Size:	740.2 KB
ID:	1091564

                            Comment


                            • #59
                              Originally posted by Hayes Barton View Post

                              Thank you,exposure scale mastered, but I still can't master sharpening. Is there an over sharpening problem in these two pictures? I want to know how the photo screener looks at the sharpness.

                              Click image for larger version

Name:	image_32498.jpg
Views:	54
Size:	687.3 KB
ID:	1091563

                              Click image for larger version

Name:	image_32499.jpg
Views:	48
Size:	740.2 KB
ID:	1091564
                              Sharpening would be acceptable for me in both, though the contrast wouldn't be, especially for the second.

                              Comment


                              • #60
                                Originally posted by dlowwa View Post

                                Sharpening would be acceptable for me in both, though the contrast wouldn't be, especially for the second.
                                Three questions.

                                1. The contrast ratio of two pictures in the last post,is there a possibility of repair?

                                2. https://www.jetphotos.com/viewqueued_b.php?id=8178443
                                Reason for rejection: JPG compression artefacts, I can't see where JPG compression is.

                                3. Do the following two pictures fail to center the aircraft fuselage due to the tractor?Or any other editorial advice.

                                Click image for larger version

Name:	DSC_7221.jpg
Views:	146
Size:	586.1 KB
ID:	1092211

                                Click image for larger version

Name:	DSC_2849.jpg
Views:	94
Size:	661.7 KB
ID:	1092212

                                Comment

                                Working...
                                X