Originally posted by dlowwa
View Post
Announcement
Collapse
No announcement yet.
Hayes Barton - Pre-screening request
Collapse
X
-
Originally posted by Hayes Barton View Post
Thank you very much. I edited five more today.
All from the same angle.
"It is not meant to be a process where you post the maximum number of requests you can, wait the minimum 24 hours, then post the maximum again, and repeat. I see more than a few guys doing this, and it shows me that they are not really making any effort to learn from the process but rather are simply taking advantage of free screening. If you've taken 10+ images in similar conditions, there is no need to post all of them for feedback. One or two will do, and you can then apply that feedback to the rest."
https://forums.jetphotos.com/forum/a...ning-from-crew
Comment
-
Originally posted by dlowwa View Post
Please read here when you get the chance, especially #3 in the original post, and then my follow up post:
"It is not meant to be a process where you post the maximum number of requests you can, wait the minimum 24 hours, then post the maximum again, and repeat. I see more than a few guys doing this, and it shows me that they are not really making any effort to learn from the process but rather are simply taking advantage of free screening. If you've taken 10+ images in similar conditions, there is no need to post all of them for feedback. One or two will do, and you can then apply that feedback to the rest."
https://forums.jetphotos.com/forum/a...ning-from-crew
I'm so sorry. I've read the suggestions in your post carefully. I won't upload every photo for prescreening in the future. I will only upload uncertain images for the purpose of learning.
The following two photos were taken in the outdoor environment with a temperature of 30 ℃. I am only 150 meters away from the plane, but the heat haze seems inevitable. I am not sure whether they can be accepted, and how to avoid the heat haze? Besides, are there any other editorial suggestions?
Thank you again for your help.
Comment
-
Originally posted by Hayes Barton View Post
The following two photos were taken in the outdoor environment with a temperature of 30 ℃. I am only 150 meters away from the plane, but the heat haze seems inevitable. I am not sure whether they can be accepted, and how to avoid the heat haze? Besides, are there any other editorial suggestions?
Thank you again for your help.
Heat haze, despite its name, is not so much a product of high temperatures as it is the difference between temperatures in different layers of the air, so you can see it on cold days too, if there is a large enough difference in temperature.
Comment
-
Originally posted by dlowwa View Post
Don't think haze is too much of a problem for these images, though there are some halos on the second.
Heat haze, despite its name, is not so much a product of high temperatures as it is the difference between temperatures in different layers of the air, so you can see it on cold days too, if there is a large enough difference in temperature.
I noticed that the sky in the upper left corner of this picture is darker than that in the upper right corner. I'm not sure if there is vignette. I need your opinion.Any editor's opinion is welcome.
Comment
-
-
Originally posted by dlowwa View Post
Slightly oversharpened, but exposure should be acceptable.
Comment
-
Originally posted by Hayes Barton View Post
Thank you,exposure scale mastered, but I still can't master sharpening. Is there an over sharpening problem in these two pictures? I want to know how the photo screener looks at the sharpness.
Comment
-
Originally posted by dlowwa View Post
Sharpening would be acceptable for me in both, though the contrast wouldn't be, especially for the second.
1. The contrast ratio of two pictures in the last post,is there a possibility of repair?
2. https://www.jetphotos.com/viewqueued_b.php?id=8178443
Reason for rejection: JPG compression artefacts, I can't see where JPG compression is.
3. Do the following two pictures fail to center the aircraft fuselage due to the tractor?Or any other editorial advice.
Comment
Comment