Announcement

Collapse
No announcement yet.

Hayes Barton - Pre-screening request

Collapse
X
 
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts

  • #61
    Originally posted by Hayes Barton View Post

    Three questions.

    1. The contrast ratio of two pictures in the last post,is there a possibility of repair?
    1. possibly
    2. unlikely

    Originally posted by Hayes Barton View Post
    2. https://www.jetphotos.com/viewqueued_b.php?id=8178443
    Reason for rejection: JPG compression artefacts, I can't see where JPG compression is.
    Compression/banding visible in sky.

    Originally posted by Hayes Barton View Post
    3. Do the following two pictures fail to center the aircraft fuselage due to the tractor?Or any other editorial advice.

    Click image for larger version

Name:	DSC_7221.jpg
Views:	69
Size:	586.1 KB
ID:	1092211

    Click image for larger version

Name:	DSC_2849.jpg
Views:	48
Size:	661.7 KB
ID:	1092212
    Centering is acceptable. Second image is backlit.

    Comment


    • #62
      Originally posted by dlowwa View Post

      Sharpening would be acceptable for me in both, though the contrast wouldn't be, especially for the second.

      I increased the contrast of P1, how about it?
      Click image for larger version

Name:	DSC_7265.jpg
Views:	46
Size:	734.3 KB
ID:	1092251

      Comment


      • #63
        Originally posted by Hayes Barton View Post


        I increased the contrast of P1, how about it?
        Click image for larger version

Name:	DSC_7265.jpg
Views:	46
Size:	734.3 KB
ID:	1092251
        looks acceptable to me

        Comment


        • #64
          Originally posted by pdeboer View Post

          looks acceptable to me
          Thank you very much.

          Comment


          • #65
            The photos were taken during different periods of sunny days.
            Is the contrast of these photos suitable?
            Other editorial suggestions can also be made.


            Click image for larger version

Name:	DSC_7436.jpg
Views:	35
Size:	411.2 KB
ID:	1092416

            Click image for larger version

Name:	DSC_4618.jpg
Views:	30
Size:	527.1 KB
ID:	1092417

            Click image for larger version

Name:	DSC_7404.jpg
Views:	32
Size:	750.8 KB
ID:	1092418

            Click image for larger version

Name:	DSC_6390.jpg
Views:	32
Size:	847.9 KB
ID:	1092419

            Click image for larger version

Name:	DSC_7334.jpg
Views:	32
Size:	855.1 KB
ID:	1092420

            Comment


            • #66
              Originally posted by Hayes Barton View Post
              The photos were taken during different periods of sunny days.
              Is the contrast of these photos suitable?
              Other editorial suggestions can also be made.
              1. contrast, borderline soft
              2. borderline overprocessed (editing halos)
              3-5 ok for me

              Comment


              • #67
                I'm not sure whether the Horizon of these three pictures is a problem.
                More editorial suggestions are also welcome.
                thank.

                Click image for larger version

Name:	DSC_7250.jpg
Views:	32
Size:	598.7 KB
ID:	1092931

                Click image for larger version

Name:	DSC_7270.jpg
Views:	27
Size:	582.9 KB
ID:	1092932

                Click image for larger version

Name:	DSC_7313.jpg
Views:	27
Size:	682.2 KB
ID:	1092933

                Comment


                • #68
                  Originally posted by Hayes Barton View Post
                  I'm not sure whether the Horizon of these three pictures is a problem.
                  More editorial suggestions are also welcome.
                  thank.

                  Click image for larger version

Name:	DSC_7250.jpg
Views:	32
Size:	598.7 KB
ID:	1092931

                  Click image for larger version

Name:	DSC_7270.jpg
Views:	27
Size:	582.9 KB
ID:	1092932

                  Click image for larger version

Name:	DSC_7313.jpg
Views:	27
Size:	682.2 KB
ID:	1092933
                  #1 could maybe use a touch of CCW rotation, otherwise they would be ok for me.

                  Comment


                  • #69
                    Originally posted by dlowwa View Post

                    #1 could maybe use a touch of CCW rotation, otherwise they would be ok for me.
                    #1 made a little counter clockwise adjustment. Is that ok?

                    Click image for larger version

Name:	DSC_7250.jpg
Views:	27
Size:	602.8 KB
ID:	1093033

                    Comment


                    • #70
                      Originally posted by Hayes Barton View Post

                      #1 made a little counter clockwise adjustment. Is that ok?
                      Would be ok for me. I concede someone might find fault with the color (whites not really white), but again would be ok for me.

                      Comment


                      • #71
                        I'm not sure about the contrast of #1,And whether the reflection of #3 Body Sun belongs to overexposure?#4's tailoring and centering are unconventional.,I'm not sure if they are suitable. I also welcome more suggestions from the editors.

                        thank you.

                        Click image for larger version  Name:	DSC_6399.jpg Views:	0 Size:	497.8 KB ID:	1093194

                        Click image for larger version  Name:	DSC_5629.jpg Views:	0 Size:	535.0 KB ID:	1093195

                        Click image for larger version  Name:	DSC_7242.jpg Views:	0 Size:	603.6 KB ID:	1093196

                        Click image for larger version

Name:	DSC_5084.jpg
Views:	17
Size:	602.5 KB
ID:	1093200

                        Comment


                        • #72
                          Originally posted by Hayes Barton View Post
                          I'm not sure about the contrast of #1,And whether the reflection of #3 Body Sun belongs to overexposure?#4's tailoring and centering are unconventional.,I'm not sure if they are suitable. I also welcome more suggestions from the editors.

                          thank you.

                          Click image for larger version Name:	DSC_6399.jpg Views:	0 Size:	497.8 KB ID:	1093194

                          Click image for larger version Name:	DSC_5629.jpg Views:	0 Size:	535.0 KB ID:	1093195

                          Click image for larger version Name:	DSC_7242.jpg Views:	0 Size:	603.6 KB ID:	1093196

                          Click image for larger version

Name:	DSC_5084.jpg
Views:	17
Size:	602.5 KB
ID:	1093200
                          1. yes borderline contrast, and also editing halos present
                          2. ok for me
                          3. would be ok for me, but there are other screeners who are less forgiving of such glare

                          Comment


                          • #73
                            I was rejected again, frustrated.
                            https://www.jetphotos.com/viewqueued_b.php?id=8255406


                            It's a new plane and I'm looking forward to getting a first registration.
                            Today's weather is good, there are thin clouds, I feel like a good shot. I adopted my usual editorial style.
                            It has been passed many times before, such as these:
                            https://www.jetphotos.com/photo/9691198
                            https://www.jetphotos.com/photo/9733236
                            https://www.jetphotos.com/photo/9738760
                            I can't see the difference between them.
                            I'm not sure if I should make a appeal.


                            The reasons for rejection are:
                            Dark / Underexposed
                            Too much or too little contrast

                            My understanding is that maybe the contrast is too much.
                            I chose a new one for editing and carefully adjusted the contrast,hoping to get the editor's advice.
                            If the exposure or contrast is still on the borderline, what standard should I use to adjust it further?
                            Or are they still possible to be repaired?
                            Thank you.

                            Click image for larger version

Name:	DSC_7922.jpg
Views:	26
Size:	612.7 KB
ID:	1093364

                            Comment


                            • #74
                              Originally posted by Hayes Barton View Post
                              I was rejected again, frustrated.
                              https://www.jetphotos.com/viewqueued_b.php?id=8255406


                              It's a new plane and I'm looking forward to getting a first registration.
                              Today's weather is good, there are thin clouds, I feel like a good shot. I adopted my usual editorial style.
                              It has been passed many times before, such as these:
                              https://www.jetphotos.com/photo/9691198
                              https://www.jetphotos.com/photo/9733236
                              https://www.jetphotos.com/photo/9738760
                              I can't see the difference between them.
                              I'm not sure if I should make a appeal.


                              The reasons for rejection are:
                              Dark / Underexposed
                              Too much or too little contrast

                              My understanding is that maybe the contrast is too much.
                              I chose a new one for editing and carefully adjusted the contrast,hoping to get the editor's advice.
                              If the exposure or contrast is still on the borderline, what standard should I use to adjust it further?
                              Or are they still possible to be repaired?
                              Thank you.

                              Click image for larger version

Name:	DSC_7922.jpg
Views:	26
Size:	612.7 KB
ID:	1093364
                              Exposure is ok, but contrast is weak. Color is also an issue. The color/contrast issue you might not be able to see because you are using the wrong color profile. You should use sRGB for images uploaded to JP.

                              Comment


                              • #75
                                How about these, especially P1 tailoring.

                                Click image for larger version

Name:	DSC_5084.jpg
Views:	58
Size:	602.5 KB
ID:	1094186

                                Click image for larger version

Name:	DSC_7599.jpg
Views:	55
Size:	598.9 KB
ID:	1094187

                                Click image for larger version

Name:	DSC_7876.jpg
Views:	54
Size:	513.9 KB
ID:	1094188

                                Click image for larger version

Name:	DSC_7369.jpg
Views:	55
Size:	768.1 KB
ID:	1094189

                                Comment

                                Working...
                                X