Hayes Barton - Pre-screening request

[dlowwa]

Three questions.

1. The contrast ratio of two pictures in the last post，is there a possibility of repair？

1. possibly
2. unlikely

2. https://www.jetphotos.com/viewqueued_b.php?id=8178443
Reason for rejection: JPG compression artefacts, I can't see where JPG compression is.

Compression/banding visible in sky.

3. Do the following two pictures fail to center the aircraft fuselage due to the tractor?Or any other editorial advice.

Centering is acceptable. Second image is backlit.

[Hayes Barton]

Sharpening would be acceptable for me in both, though the contrast wouldn't be, especially for the second.

I increased the contrast of P1, how about it?

[pdeboer]

I increased the contrast of P1, how about it?

looks acceptable to me

[Hayes Barton]

looks acceptable to me

Thank you very much.

[Hayes Barton]

The photos were taken during different periods of sunny days.
Is the contrast of these photos suitable?
Other editorial suggestions can also be made.

[dlowwa]

The photos were taken during different periods of sunny days.
Is the contrast of these photos suitable?
Other editorial suggestions can also be made.

1. contrast, borderline soft
2. borderline overprocessed (editing halos)
3-5 ok for me

[Hayes Barton]

I'm not sure whether the Horizon of these three pictures is a problem.
More editorial suggestions are also welcome.
thank.

[dlowwa]

I'm not sure whether the Horizon of these three pictures is a problem.
More editorial suggestions are also welcome.
thank.

#1 could maybe use a touch of CCW rotation, otherwise they would be ok for me.

[Hayes Barton]

#1 could maybe use a touch of CCW rotation, otherwise they would be ok for me.

#1 made a little counter clockwise adjustment. Is that ok?

[dlowwa]

#1 made a little counter clockwise adjustment. Is that ok?

Would be ok for me. I concede someone might find fault with the color (whites not really white), but again would be ok for me.

[Hayes Barton]

I'm not sure about the contrast of #1，And whether the reflection of #3 Body Sun belongs to overexposure？#4's tailoring and centering are unconventional.,I'm not sure if they are suitable. I also welcome more suggestions from the editors.

thank you.

[dlowwa]

I'm not sure about the contrast of #1，And whether the reflection of #3 Body Sun belongs to overexposure？#4's tailoring and centering are unconventional.,I'm not sure if they are suitable. I also welcome more suggestions from the editors.

thank you.

1. yes borderline contrast, and also editing halos present
2. ok for me
3. would be ok for me, but there are other screeners who are less forgiving of such glare

[Hayes Barton]

I was rejected again, frustrated.
https://www.jetphotos.com/viewqueued_b.php?id=8255406


It's a new plane and I'm looking forward to getting a first registration.
Today's weather is good, there are thin clouds, I feel like a good shot. I adopted my usual editorial style.
It has been passed many times before, such as these:
https://www.jetphotos.com/photo/9691198
https://www.jetphotos.com/photo/9733236
https://www.jetphotos.com/photo/9738760
I can't see the difference between them.
I'm not sure if I should make a appeal.


The reasons for rejection are:
Dark / Underexposed
Too much or too little contrast

My understanding is that maybe the contrast is too much.
I chose a new one for editing and carefully adjusted the contrast,hoping to get the editor's advice.
If the exposure or contrast is still on the borderline, what standard should I use to adjust it further?
Or are they still possible to be repaired?
Thank you.

[dlowwa]

I was rejected again, frustrated.
https://www.jetphotos.com/viewqueued_b.php?id=8255406


It's a new plane and I'm looking forward to getting a first registration.
Today's weather is good, there are thin clouds, I feel like a good shot. I adopted my usual editorial style.
It has been passed many times before, such as these:
https://www.jetphotos.com/photo/9691198
https://www.jetphotos.com/photo/9733236
https://www.jetphotos.com/photo/9738760
I can't see the difference between them.
I'm not sure if I should make a appeal.


The reasons for rejection are:
Dark / Underexposed
Too much or too little contrast

My understanding is that maybe the contrast is too much.
I chose a new one for editing and carefully adjusted the contrast,hoping to get the editor's advice.
If the exposure or contrast is still on the borderline, what standard should I use to adjust it further?
Or are they still possible to be repaired?
Thank you.

Exposure is ok, but contrast is weak. Color is also an issue. The color/contrast issue you might not be able to see because you are using the wrong color profile. You should use sRGB for images uploaded to JP.

[Hayes Barton]

How about these, especially P1 tailoring.