Originally posted by dlowwa
View Post
Announcement
Collapse
No announcement yet.
MQ1131 - Prescreening / Editing Advice
Collapse
X
-
Originally posted by MQ1131 View PostHello guys, I recently have a high dynamic shot (mostly cloudy situation and only spot light on the a/c).
I would like to have some feedback on it.My major concern are overexposure and too much contrast.
Thank you for any advice in advance.
Leave a comment:
-
-
Originally posted by MQ1131 View Posthttps://www.jetphotos.com/viewqueued_b.php?id=8429060
I got this one rejected for Horizon unlevel andJPG compression artefacts.
I checked equalized photo, haven't spot siginificant compression artifiact. They usually have very obvioius mosaic blocks on the sky. I would like to know what could I improve because I always output it at maximum quality(12).
I also pulled a few references line as shown below, not too sure about why this is unlevel. They all looks good. If I have to say there is something could be done better is to cwc about 0.05 degree.
On the other hands, I do reco the heat distortion is borderline.
I would like to have any advice on editing. Thank you in advance.and the photo has a chance to be accepted on appeal.
Leave a comment:
-
JetPhotos.com is the biggest database of aviation photographs with over 5 million screened photos online!
I got this one rejected for Horizon unlevel andJPG compression artefacts.
I checked equalized photo, haven't spot siginificant compression artifiact. They usually have very obvioius mosaic blocks on the sky. I would like to know what could I improve because I always output it at maximum quality(12).
I also pulled a few references line as shown below, not too sure about why this is unlevel. They all looks good. If I have to say there is something could be done better is to cwc about 0.05 degree.
On the other hands, I do reco the heat distortion is borderline.
I would like to have any advice on editing. Thank you in advance.
Leave a comment:
-
-
Originally posted by dlowwa View Post
I think you missed the point..if you don't agree with a rejection, come here first for advice. Once an appeal has been processed, I will no longer get involved. That is clearly mentioned here, so you might want to give it another read:
https://forums.jetphotos.com/forum/a...ning-from-crew
Would you suggest me to add additional comments to a new upload of same photo to avoid screener getting misled by this unparallel building outlines or there is a chance to actually improve it by post processing?
Cheers!
Leave a comment:
-
Originally posted by MQ1131 View Post
Hi, dlowwa. Thanks for your reply. My appeal was rejected earlier for not presenting enough proofs to back my point. However, I wasn't able to appeal on the same pic twice. Can you have a look on that? Thanks!
- Likes 1
Leave a comment:
-
Originally posted by dlowwa View Post
Image has already been appealed, not sure what you are expecting by posting here.
Leave a comment:
-
Originally posted by MQ1131 View PostI had a possiblely wrong upload rejection and appeal rejection due to a misleading building.
I found out the white building(MLC Centre) next to sydney tower, has a misleading outline may caused the rejection. If you cross compared the left most line of the MLC Centre and right most line, you can see they are not parallel at all. One of them must be not vertical to the ground. When you check my reference line on the nearby building (eg. Sydney Tower), it's easy to tell that the rest of the buildings outline are aligned with my vertical reference lines.
This was really tricky one to spot as your offical tool has a vertical line right on the misleading sides of the building.
Cheers!
https://www.jetphotos.com/viewqueued_b.php?id=8405557
Leave a comment:
-
I had a possiblely wrong upload rejection and appeal rejection due to a misleading building.
I found out the white building(MLC Centre) next to sydney tower, has a misleading outline may caused the rejection. If you cross compared the left most line of the MLC Centre and right most line, you can see they are not parallel at all. One of them must be not vertical to the ground. When you check my reference line on the nearby building (eg. Sydney Tower), it's easy to tell that the rest of the buildings outline are aligned with my vertical reference lines.
This was really tricky one to spot as your offical tool has a vertical line right on the misleading sides of the building.
Cheers!
Leave a comment:
-
Originally posted by MQ1131 View PostI need some help on cropping and composition. In some cases, I cut the winglet then it got rejected for partial cut off, and sometimes I keep the whole wing, it got bad composition.
So as for this photo, am I on the right track of cutting part of the wing? Do I need to cut more wing/vertical stabilizer?
And any potential sharpness issues for this one?
Thank you in advance!
Leave a comment:
Leave a comment: